User talk:Broad Wall

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Broad Wall, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Hezekiah. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Gosox5555 (talk) 17:06, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amos Frumkin

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Amos Frumkin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Please take a look at WP:PROF; if Dr. Frumkin meets these criteria, would you please add more references/etc? thanks! ErikHaugen (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

10th-century city wall, Jerusalem

As this article's title does not meet our neutral point of view policy at WP:NPOV I have started a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#10th-century_city_wall.2C_Jerusalem. Dougweller (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:41, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

Image:TempleStepsMay2009.JPG|Southern steps of the Temple Mount, Jerusalem. Image:NinthAvStonesWesternWall.JPG|Stones from the Western Wall of the Temple Mount (Jerusalem) thrown onto the street by Roman soldiers on the Ninth of Av, 70 C.E.

Gaza Flotilla Crash

User:Kasaalan is making multiple reverts to remove material about the political (Islamist) affiliations of the owner/sponsoring urkish organization of the ship involved in the fighting.Broad Wall (talk) 14:57, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you point to some diffs? It's very difficult to wade through the article's history. -- tariqabjotu 15:01, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The offending editor is User:Kslotte my error.

14:36, 1 June 2010 Kslotte (talk | contribs) (56,740 bytes) (→Ships in the flotilla: re-structure) ( [[1]] about half-way down the page, where the left hand column is entitled "Islamist links".

14:50, 1 June 2010 Kslotte (talk | contribs) (56,325 bytes) (revert; re-structuring to have proper layout) (undo) [[2]] removing same material. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Broad Wall (talk • contribs) 15:11, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay; well, I blocked Kslotte ten minutes ago. -- tariqabjotu 15:13, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The material Kslotte removed is still gone. How does it get back into the article?Broad Wall (talk) 15:15, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- How does it get back into the article? Consensus. -- tariqabjotu 15:20, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

prior accounts

Have you ever had a prior account on Wikipedia? nableezy - 16:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thanks broad Wall for the compliment and good advice. A B Chrysler (talk) 16:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Latma TV

An article that you have been involved in editing, Latma TV, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latma TV. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. rʨanaɢ (talk) 15:42, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jezreel (city)

On July 9, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jezreel (city), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rock-cut tombs

Hi Broad Wall! Re your recently-created page on rock-cut tombs, there's a similar article on sepulchres, which is very heavily biased to just one locality and it occurred to me that, rather than have two articles on quite similar themes, you might consider improving that article by including your material there. Just a suggestion! Regards Jimmy Pitt talk 12:29, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean, and your proposed re-titling of Sepulchre seems a good idea. You can do this yourself with a simple move -- go to sepulchre and click on the "move" tab at the top of the page; this will bring up a new page, where you can enter a new name for the article and give a reason for the change. I could do it for you, but you might find it useful to learn how to do it yourself -- if you have any questions feel free to ask. Jimmy Pitt talk 12:48, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's odd! I know that only autoconfirmed users can do page moves, but I'd have thought the number of edits you've done would have pushed you up to autoconfirmed. In the circumstances, I'll do the move using Rock-cut tombs in ancient Israel as the new title and leave you to take it from there. Jimmy Pitt talk 13:00, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Broadwall, I saw some wording in the article about the "Tomb of the Pharaoh's Daughter" which sounded almost 'weasel word-ish' in attributing the lack of care of the tomb to the involvement of Israeli settlers. The photo accompanying the text appears to back up the statement. However, another photo appearing here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:City_of_david2.jpg shows the tomb within a larger context. In that photo, the building next to the tomb appears to be a Palestinian home, and while there are buildings that suggest Israeli habitation in the shot, there also are buildings that appear to be in Palestinian possession. Given Silwan's unfortunate political situation, I feel it's very important to really be careful about maintaining a NPOV. Thanks! 174.70.120.166 (talk) 02:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Broad Wall. You have new messages at Jimmy Pitt's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hezekiah's Tunnel

If not in Silwan, where? Chesdovi (talk) 13:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It runs form Kidron to siloam pool under the City of David. Silwan was uninhabited until the early Christin monks moved into the tombs. And lay entirely on the eastern slope of the valley, farming villagers not wanting to build on the arable valley floor.Broad Wall (talk) 13:40, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As today it lies under expanded Silwan, this info should be placed in the appropriate place. Chesdovi (talk) 13:51, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi - could I ask you please to always use edit summaries unless you are reverting obvious vandalism? It's part of the collaborative basis of Wikipedia. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 16:30, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rock-cut tombs in ancient Israel

On July 24, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rock-cut tombs in ancient Israel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

I am glad that this was approved and made the lead spot. Well done and congratulations. Dincher (talk) 00:52, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dwarfie Stane

Please help me. I added footnote number 15, but with "edit" I have a problem with: {{cite.....}. When I just copy what everyone did, something goes wrong in the article itself (title, etc.). Please change it for the better. Thank you, Lex Ritman P.S. The book is in the Royal Library in The Hague (The Netherlands). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Romeinsekeizer (talk • contribs) 16:55, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dwarfie Stane (extra)

I just added a small correction. Now it is okay. Romeinsekeizer (talk) 10:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Romeinsekeizer (talk) 10:30, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Historicist for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. nableezy - 19:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts and evading a topic ban. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.