User talk:Billtkd
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Nomination of Taekwondoscotland for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taekwondoscotland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taekwondoscotland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:29, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Taekwondo Scotland logo.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Taekwondo Scotland logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:38, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of band name etymologies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bound for Glory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Billtkd. Do you have a WP:Reliable source for these number changes at the Y chromosome article? If not, I will eventually change the numbers back to what they were before. Flyer22 (talk) 18:59, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Done. I have added the best ones I could get from here. I have more reliable sources via on-line subscriptions to scientific journals at work (I teach genetics at a university.) but I can't access them from home. Billtkd (talk) 21:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Billtkd, while I appreciate you providing a source for this material, I'm not sure that source counts as a WP:Reliable source; read the WP:Reliable source guideline for what I mean about what Wikipedia considers a reliable source. And for biomedical content in particular, such as chromosomes, the type of sourcing we should use is addressed at Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) (WP:MEDRS). Flyer22 (talk) 21:11, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- The source for the number of genes on the Y chromosome is the US National Centre for Biotechnology Information. The other source (on the number of base pairs) was already cited on the page, in the section headed 'Human Y Chromosome'. I will try to get better sources (primary scientific articles) tomorrow at work. However, the Ensembl Project (the source of the reference) is a legitimate scientific source, set up by organisations such as the European Molecular Biology Organisation. See http://www.ensembl.org/info/about/index.html. In any case, I would classify this as molecular biology, not biomedical, but I may be prejudiced because I am a molecular biologist. I think Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (natural sciences) is therefore probably more appropriate. Billtkd (talk) 21:40, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dominance (genetics) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:32, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
[edit]Your upload of File:British Taekwondo landscape.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:08, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
April 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stepps may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- School was established in 1902 but opened in new premises, shared with [Stepps Public Library]] on a different site in 2007. Most of its pupils go on to [[Chryston High School]]. St Joseph's
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:45, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 26
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pseudodominance, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dominant, Imprinting and Deletion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Billtkd. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to [email protected].
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit]Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF). About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stargate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Continuum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Billtkd. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Billtkd. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 18
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alan Price, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don't Look Back (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
January 2019
[edit]Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Monopoly (game), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please also see WP:IPCV. DonIago (talk) 20:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Still Game characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amy MacDonald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anglo-Indian cuisine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Street (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for September 29
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Airdrie, North Lanarkshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Chalmers.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Sorted. Billtkd (talk) 14:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Banjo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bluegrass.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Varieties of English
[edit]Hello. In a recent edit to the page Caravan (band), you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:05, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
The style in which collective nouns are treated as plural (e.g., "the committee are in favour") is not a general UK phenomenon. It is mainly used in England and there mainly in business jargon. It is not common throughout the UK, e.g., in Scotland or the North of England. Billtkd (talk) 12:23, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
July 2021
[edit]Hi Billtkd! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Acne that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. --Renat 16:33, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, RenatUK. I marked it 'minor edit' because I felt that I wasn't changing the intended meaning (namely, that there is a genetic component to acne), merely improving the syntax.
October 2021
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of common misconceptions, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 01:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
I felt no need for a source since the danger of pencil shavings in a closed, weightless habitat (such as the ISS) is self-evident. Billtkd (talk) 11:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for responding. As with most claims that "it doesn't need a source", if it's that self-evident, it doesn't need to be in the article because the reader would already know it. It's an irrelevant comment, and it's based on your personal misunderstanding of a pencil in space flight, which can be found in reliable sources; mechanical pencils were used. I'm not criticizing you. I just try to keep irrelevant cruft bloat off of Wikipeida, especially in an article like this one which is already bloated. So I point it out when I see it. Sundayclose (talk) 15:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for November 13
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Latin place names in Britain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bute.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 9
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chili sauce and paste, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paste.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Sucrase
[edit]Your edit to sucrase is valuable. Wikipedia lacks editors with this kind of knowledge. Please scrutinize related articles! --Smokefoot (talk) 14:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)