Jump to content

User talk:Arthistorian1977/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

Welcome!

Hello, Arthistorian1977, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Vardi kahana, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bazj (talk) 10:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vardi kahana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vardi kahana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bazj (talk) 10:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

You need to add some references to the article to make your claims "credible". This is doubly important for biographies of living people. If you go to preferences (link at the top of the page), then gadgets, and turn on ProveIt you'll find it a lot easier to add references. Bazj (talk) 11:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vardi Kahana

Hello, Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Vardi Kahana, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)


Hi. There are three issues with this article: Firstly you can't unfortunately simply translate an article from another Wiki without including the attribution on the talk page, after all, the article was someone else's work. Secondly the article is totally unsourced and that is almost a reason for an immediate deletion for a BLP on en.Wiki. We are very strict here about sources for BLPs - far stricter than other Wikipedias. Finally, it appears that she is notable for only one thing: winning an award, and that award on its own is not enough. On Wikipedia being famous does not necessarily equate to being notable. What we need here are multiple, independent, reliable sources such as articles about her in the established press. For more information please see WP:CREATIVE. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:49, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Tamír Triad has been reverted.
Your edit here to Tamír Triad was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://coolingpearls.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/the-tamir-triad-by-lynn-flewelling/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Christie (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffalo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Herzliya Museum of Contemporary Art

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Herzliya Museum of Contemporary Art, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Society_&_Culture/Herzliyamuse.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:06, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Aldrich. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Re: Speedy deletion nomination of 1999 in Sudan

It is really a working page. More information will be added to the page, related and unrelated to the Second Congo War. Jackninja5 (talk) 09:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC) Thank you for clarification. I've removed the nomination Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Re: Speedy deletion nomination of Tang De-jhang

Tang De-jhang is a Taiwanese hero, User:王文明 just wants to translate it to English to let every in the world knom him. User:王文明 can't understand why Arthistorian1977 consider to delect it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 王文明 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Sajan Prakash.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Sajan Prakash.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:06, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Fylbecatulous. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 18+ (band), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Fylbecatulous talk 18:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Herzliya Museum of Contemporary Art

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Herzliya Museum of Contemporary Art requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Society_&_Culture/Herzliyamuse.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tek022 | Comments? 21:15, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mattias Härenstam, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Installation and Swedish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Glimpses: A Collection of Nightrunner Short Stories

The article Glimpses: A Collection of Nightrunner Short Stories has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources, just a library database entry and a LiveJournal. Fails WP:NBOOK.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Johann Paul Keller

Thanks for your message. I see your point, I thought that there we enough references on Wikipedia to his work that makes the stub relevant enough. I can understand that the texts seem promotional, that was not my intention. I'll leave the decision up to you. I am of course willing to write more on the person if you think that the relevance is high enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martsniez (talk • contribs) 13:03, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

speedy A1; vandalism

A1, no context , is only for use when it is impossible to identify the subject of the article. I therefore removed your nomination of Cold War Tensions and the Polio Vaccine, because it's clearly about polio vaccine. However, it probably does duplicate content in other articles, and hat needs to be checked. DGG ( talk ) 15:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Tayub naveed is not vandalism. Adding an article on a non-notableperson, even for the second time, is not an attempt to damage the encyclopedia. Vandalism is a very strong word, and should not be used except for more serious cases.

Please re-read carefully WP:CSD--the various criteria are interpreted narrowly. DGG ( talk ) 15:18, 25 March 2015 (UTC) DGG ( talk ) 15:18, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 

 It was a hoax, not vandalism and it's the same category Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Herzliya Museum of Contemporary Art, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestinian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Caroline, Lady Dalmeny

Hello Arthistorian1977. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Caroline, Lady Dalmeny, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. SD0001 (talk) 12:22, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

David Hansen (countertenor)
added links pointing to Agrippina, Rodelinda, American and Alan Gilbert

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lisa Oppenheim
added a link pointing to Guggenheim Museum
Sage Sohier
added a link pointing to Portland

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yuriy Abramochkin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


Speedy deletion nomination of Danish Sheikh

Hi, I edited the article further to keep it purely informative. Please review and let me know if it looks okay now. Thanks! Below is my talkPage response:- This page should not be speedily deleted because... (Danish Sheikh is actually a Charisma Coach based out of Mumbai. I have personally attended one of his guest lectures in IISB, Indore, which is a management institute based in Indore, India. I also read an article on him in Outlook Business Magazine, April 2015 edition. Please check the URL present in references section to read the Outlook Business article before you choose to delete this page. Here is the link to WIKI page of Outlook Magazine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outlook_(magazine). You can check his official website, www.charisma-coach.com and www.charisma-coach.com/testimonials for more info) --Sharafat143 (talk) 10:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ivan Buyan

I would like to discuss remove a page dedicated to Ivan Buyan. He is one of the most famous Ukrainian rappers, his concerts were held in every major city in Ukraine and Belarus and Russia. His latest video gained more than 100,000 views on YouTube. There are articles about him in Ukrainian and Belarusian Wikipedia and it's very important. In addition to all this he appeared several times on television. I think that's enough of it to an article in the Wiki. I have created this article a few hours ago and have not had time to fill it completely. --Ukrainebestintheworld (talk) 14:09, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Edit page Ivan Buyan

Fully edited page, added the city where he performed and proof of the veracity these performances. I think that this information is sufficient. In addition, we must remember that the development of hip-hop in different countries is not the same. For Ukraine 100,000 views and statements in the CIS countries is already significant level. I hope for understanding and the fact that you will not remove my article. --Ukrainebestintheworld (talk) 16:13, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Delete

Wasn't aware you couldn't use Wikipedia to make pages about yourself. I tried to do it for jobs. Just go ahead and delete it. I couldn't figure it out myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hmkeal (talk • contribs) 15:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your tags ,contributions and advice regarding the article I have created (ROMARM) . I will keep working at the page until it meets Wikipedia standards. Until then feel free to point out any mistakes .Nonetheless thank you again for your contribution. Romdwolf (talk) 11:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sharon Yaari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BFA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Yuriy Abramochkin

Hi, I've reverted the removal of tags. Please wait until the AfD is closed by an uninvolved editor. See WP:NOTEARLY. Regards - NQ (talk) 12:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I wasn't aware of this process. Didn't want to make a harm Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
No worries, just letting you know. - NQ (talk) 12:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Please return infinitics

It is not done yet give me about a week to finish it please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdullah2323ify (talk • contribs) 18:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Orbit Aviation

Hello Arthistorian1977. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Orbit Aviation, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 22:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

do not delete omniocracy

I was invited years ago by one of the major editors at Wikipedia to create a page for the term omniocracy. I did not do it then because I did not think there were enough references to include with the article. Now it has been discussed at length in 4 books. Two of the books came out in 2015. The term omniocracy is used at animal rights conferences, in speeches and in books. It makes a significant contribution to world knowledge. It should not be deleted. I can make the article longer if you want, but I was hoping someone else would want to add some paragraphs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lauracaluncle (talk • contribs) 21:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

CSD A1

Hi! I've removed your speedy deletion tag from Omniocracy. I agree that its a neologism and likely not an article that will be kept in the long run but it does not qualify for speedy deletion. Each of the speedy deletion criteria are narrowly defined and only pages meeting those criteria qualify to be speedily deleted. CSD A1 is for articles that are very short and provide so little context that you can't figure out what its supposed to be about. While not great, the Omniocracy article does provide significant context, including who coined the phrase and where it was used.

Check out WP:PROD and WP:AFD for other ways to request article deletion when they don't qualify for speedy deletion. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. --Nick—Contact/Contribs 21:20, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

lists of exhibitions

On this addition of a list of exhibitions: please see Talk:Rinko Kawauchi and also the edit summaries on both the left and right sides of this page. Thank you. -- Hoary (talk) 22:24, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Regard Rakhee Kapoor Tandon Speedy deletion tag.

This page should not be speedily deleted because it is a readily trending topic currently in India. If you google about her, you will see plenty of news links, both from authorized news channels as well as, private networks of internet media encompassing her eligibility. She was one of the top 25 most influential women of India.

I have duly provided the links and references and even cited the proper links. Kindly remove the speedy deletion tag after authenticating all the links. Regards, Tanishq (talk) 21:57, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

New pages patrol

Hello Arthistorian1977

Thanks for patrolling new pages. Wikipedia appreciates your help. However, am aware that you often wrongly tag articles for speedy deletion such as this one you tagged as Vandalism or hoax. The article is actually not vandalism or hoax, its about one of our new editor, Nequi (talk · contribs) who is probably not notable. While we encourage editors to patrol new pages, we usually frown on wrong tagging and nomination of articles for speedy deletion. I suggest that you should slow down a bit in tagging pages for speedy deletion until you are more familiar with WP:CSD. Thanks! Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 06:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Wikicology, thank you for your suggestion. I would not say "often", while you mention only one article. Also, this one specific was clearly candidate for speedy deletion and it was clearly looking as a usual hoax teenagers post on Wikipedia. Regards Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
The article, Rakhee Kapoor Tandon that you tagged for speedy deletion per A7 is clearly notable. Asadulla pasha that you tagged for speedy deletion per G11 is not eligible for that criterion as well because G11 does not applies to minor promotional wording. I noticed this ones because I'm aware of them. There are others I may not be aware of. The fact that an article is a candidate for speedy deletion does not mean it should be deleted under any criteria for speedy deletion. Deleting pages with the appropriate criterion does not only help the article creator to know the exact reasons why their page got deleted but also enhance the justification of such deletion. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 06:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
I would allow myself not to agree with you. The fact that the person is a daughter if an prominent businessman and a blogger does not support a notability claim. As well as with Asadulla pasha, the original article was heavy promotional and Speedy Deletion criteria defines this as "Pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic" Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G11. As we both know, speedy deletion can be contested and in case author misspell the name, which does not allow to find reliable source or wants to rewrite am article to comply with Wikipedia criteria, nothing stops her/him from doing it. At the end, our aim as new pages patrollers is to bring admin attention to the articles we suspect as wrong and the final decision lies with admin. So, I am still not being cleat what is your problem with me. Regards. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
You probably do not know how things work here. Do you? Am also puzzled by your last comments that "So, I am still not being cleat what is your problem with me". Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:31, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
I think we should stop the discussion, since I am not happy with the tone you talk to me. So, assuming good faith, which is a custom on Wikipedia, let our ways part Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

Here is the required link which I'll be adding to the respective page as well. This is the list made by India Group, mentioning India's 25 most influential woman. I hope you remove the removal tag.

Link: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/gallery/indias-25-most-influential-women/16/8871.html Tanishq (talk) 09:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello Tanishq. Let see what other editors has to say. Still, one mention does not have a strong claim for proper notability. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:52, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Agreed. Thank-you for the suggestion. Should I try finding more references if possible? Because there are tons which were published last week following her getting viral post Indian Premier League Final, when she aired on Television. Tanishq (talk) 09:55, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Definetely yes. As far as you can improve the article, showing the notability, it worth it. Regards Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Radium Exports

Dear Sir,

My page has been deleted as it comes across as promotion; however the deleted page is still visible in google search. Can you pls untag it from google search. Appreciate your help. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neha Shah Radium (talk • contribs) 11:16, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Information icon Thank you for your suggestion regarding William Royse Lysaght. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). You tagged an article that was four minutes old with uncategorised and refimprove. If you'd give editors a chance to actually edit, rather than edit-conflicting them with such garbage, they might actually add categories and further references. On the other hand, you could try actually finding some references or adding categories yourself instead. RexxS (talk) 14:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Asadulla Pasha

Hi Arthistorian1977 You have tagged Asadulla Pasha for speedy deletion a week ago. The page has been improved by different users, and raised concerned were hopefully addressed, including substantial justification that it's not "unambiguously promotional". Could you please check it once and remove the tag now. Thanks User:Fasiullah 04:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Your speedy deletion tagging

Surav Pantha was not vandalism. It gave no indication of importance and was probably invented by the page's author, but it was not vandalism. Please re-read Wikipedia:Vandalism before tagging any further articles. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:53, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

when the child writes article about himself, I agree it's not vandalism, but it's definitely a hoax. Up until now, I marked articles of teenagers with this tag and no Admin complained about it. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:00, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

tubal.org

Will work on it...going to use the model for WebMD.com that should make it work I appreciate your help...it will take me some time to get all the rules and regs down. Please let me know ...telling the history of the reason for the web site is history ...suggestions so I am appealing this deletion to change it to get it right ...Dr.V.Georges Hufnagel (talk) 00:32, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

will add media and press reviews also... thanks drvikki

Herman Mashaba speedy deletion

Hi Arthistorian1977 . I wrote on the "contest" page of the speedy deletion note but I haven't removed the tag. This article about Mashaba is important especially for South Africans. Many who look up to him for his story of rags to riches in a very harsh climate of Apartheid. He deserves a wikipedia page.


Please look at the page and tell me what needs to be changed in order to meet your expectations and remove the speedy deletion notice? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsg24 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ISF Waterloo

Hi Arthistorian1977 This is the first time I create a Wikipedia page. The original information was on World International School, but it is not correct since that school no longer exists. ISF Waterloo is the school that occupies the same grounds. It was important to distinguish the two. I would need more time to re-edit the page, but I wanted to save my progress. Any advice on how to proceed is appreciated! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zad-dig (talk • contribs) 10:59, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

@Zad-dig: I suggest you move the article to your user sandbox and submit it to review prior creating a new article in article space. You can use this is as the reference - Wikipedia:Your first article Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:14, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Second Sight Medical Products

What do you think is promotional in the article?Rathfelder (talk) 21:21, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of my page Kevin D Carter

I don't understand the reason, please explain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cart3r27 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

References for Somalatha Subasinghe

Hi thanks for your review. I had mistakenly saved this page before adding the references - can you please check now and remove the "no reference" tag? I will be adding more sections to this page in the coming week Kisholi (talk) 07:06, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Deidre Behar

Hi, I invite you to withdraw your nomination for deletion from Deidre Behar. I think the article is quite good, on a notable person per her role with Clevver and ET alone. Moreover, I have provided over a dozen sources on her life and career. Thanks for your work patrolling. --JumpLike23 (talk) 18:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello. Let see what other editors have to say. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 18:59, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Australian artists

The information in a plain list without intellectual content is not copyright in the US, but making an article by copypaste is a very poor idea. When you do copy lists, it is very wise to alter the material in some way,such as by changing the sequence or selecting significant items, not reprinting the entirety. You should concentrate on the essentials: Works in major museums (each individual work needs to be cited with a separate reference, preferable to the museum's web site or publication) and significant publications about the artist (mere notices about an exhibition are not significant publications, and each reference needs to be used to document the relevant specific point in the article.) Statements about what the artist is trying to do , if derived from the artist, need to be so indicated, and given a specific published reference. Comments by others about the artist's work need specific documentation from a RS. Gallery publications accompanying an exhibit at a commercial gallery are press releases, not reliable sources. I would normally limit the list of group exhibits to ones of special prestiges, and consider limiting the list of individual ones similarly. Articles constructed the way you have been doing are very vulnerable to deletion. It's up to you to do it better, though it takes considerably longer.

To avoid doubt, it is indeed possible for the gallery to donate the text. But they must not merely permit WP to use it, they must formally donate it according to the detailed requirements of WP:DCM, observing all of the formal steps specified there, which give everyone in the world an irrevocable license to reuse and modify it, even for commercial purposes. A general statement is insufficient. The permission must also be given by someone who is in fact the owner of the copyright. (If they copied it from a statement provided by the artist, the artist probably is the one who owns the copyright) If you are the owner, see the following paragraph about conflict of interest.

Additionally, some of your recent articles seem to be based on material published by the same gallery. If it should be the case that you have some conflict of interest with the gallery, especially a paid conflict of interest as an employee or contractor or paid writer, you must declare it, according to our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure. This is not optional. The best place to do it is on each article's talk page. DGG ( talk ) 01:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

DGG - Well, thank you indeed for a thorough explanation. Those articles are not mine and have no relation to the gallery. I stumbled upon one article of them as new created article. noticed they have more and tried to make them better, mostly by adding independent source for the list of exhibition, since art is my primary interest and most articles I work on are art related. This is the reason I've tried to make author, who is related to the gallery, judging by the name :) to note they are going to be deleted unless they properly release copyrighted materials. So, the explanation goes to Sulliva_strumpf. I've actually tried to reach them about another issue of their article, but the look like ignoring the talk page :( Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:48, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
I've copied my advice to the other editor . Since Notability is based on those two factors I've mentioned&, the other parts can be eliminated ,which should solve the problem. if demonstrated can stand on their own. I may go there and simply remove those sections now myself. It's up to you if you think they are important enough to clean up further DGG ( talk ) 06:54, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
I think this will be a good idea. Actually you gave some information to think on, since in the articles about Israeli photographers, I've created I've used lists of all their exhibitions. So, I think it would be wise for me to remove those, which does not have any references, but Artist own page. Which actually bring me to the question - if I see the exhibition mentioned on Artist's page and some galleries, which definteley not related one to each other, may I consider it credible. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Re: Speedy deletion nomination of Gay European Tourism Association

Hey i don't think it is to promotional. Its FAR less promotional than the (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Gay_and_Lesbian_Travel_Association) IGLTA, which is the equivalent. I think it's purely a description of a trade association. --Rajsolanki7119 (talk) 12:28, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Deny delete from Nikola Vecenaj-Leportinov

Dear user,

contect that I copied from web page http://www.leportinov.com is my web page. I have a proof in my google web master tool. I write everything what is on that page, and there is no reason to delete the article. Hope to hear you soon! Thanx a lot! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klauscro (talk • contribs) 07:51, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello Klauscro. In order to use your text in Wikipedia, you need explicitly donate it. Please, look at Wikipedia:Copyright problems in order to how to handle copyright issues. Just saying that it's your website is not enough. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Sialkot (1761), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dal Khalsa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Bezalel Smotrich

Please stop adding him to Category:Homophobia – it's made clear in the category that it is not for people. Thanks, Number 57 12:08, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
Thank you for finding and adding sources to the Russian actresses' articles, You were quite honestly a big big help so thank you! :),

Keep up the great work, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Dick Semerdjian deletion discussion

Hi Art Historian,

I see you proposed Dick Semerdjian for deletion. Because the PROD tag was removed by a sockpuppet of Orangemoody, I have now sent it to AFD. If you have a moment, could you leave your comments? --Slashme (talk) 23:20, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Wow, it was some time ago. The article is definitely promotional. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 23:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Contesting deletion of Remi Eriksen

Hi Arthistorian1977, I'm contesting deletion of Remi Eriksen because he is the CEO of an organization with some 15.000 employees and 300 offices in 100 different countries. I assume this is notable. Bjornte (talk) 10:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Hi again, I see that the article is now deleted. Can you explain the rationale? Can you point me to a specific entry in the notability guidelines? Also, I just did the following search in Google News: "Remi Eriksen" "dnv gl" -site:dnvgl.com. So there are currently "About 3,750 results" about him in sources that Google understands as news. Wouldn't this make him notable, even if he wasn't CEO of a multinational organization? In advance thanks for your response. I don't know the guy, so I'm not going to take this personally ;-) Bjornte (talk) 11:17, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
    • I am posting here to avoid breaking the thread. I am the admin who deleted Remi Eriksen; Arthistorian1977 nominated it but did not himself/herself delete it. I accept that this gentleman may indeed be notable; this notability was not implied, averred or claimed in the article. If you wish to expand the article so as to include a significant claim of wikipaedic notability I can post the text to your talk-page. Let me know; on my page, not this one. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:50, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (Dear Sir,

We are working on this Wikipedia page for an historic Olympic organization founded by the late great Al Oerter, Olympic icon, with several dozen notable high profile Olympic athletes, including world record holders, Olympic champions and numerous Olympic medalists, most of which can be verified on Wikipedia. This organization has been in existence for 9 years, including a physical museum/gallery located in Fort Myers Fl for almost four years. Most of the activities and files have been hidden, tucked away or lost. We are in the process of tracking down all or at least most of the past activities and creating our virtual presence, under the leadership of Cathy Oerter, Chairwoman of AOTO and widow of the late Al Oerter. We will / are linking to videos, articles, press coverage and other documentation to validate the organization and all of its accomplishments as you - Wikipedia - require. We've started with an Instagram account and last week we created the "Art of The Olympian" YouTube channel that now has a dozen videos including a 30 minute documentary video narrated by 1968 figure skating champion and AOTO artist Peggy Fleming. As well we will be improving our existing website.

The "Art of the Olympians" were given permission to use the USOC Olympic Rings and the word "Olympian", an act protected by congress. We are in the process of becoming an official IOC (International Olympic Committee) recognized organization.

I am one of the founding members. My name is Roald Bradstock, 2 time GB Olympic javelin thrower, former world record holder and current masters world record holder for over 50. I am also nicknamed "The Olympic Picasso" by the media and am now in charge of the Art of the Olympians (AOTO) organization. It is essential that we have a Wikipedia page for this organization.

If you need any more questions please feel free to contact me. Thank you.

Kind regards

Roald Bradstock 770 882 7799) Yogurtboy (talk) 15:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello Roald. Please, not that Wikipedia is not a promotional and advertising site. In order to be published, article has to be encyclopedic and be supported by verifiable sources. Please, refer to Wikipedia:Notability. I suggest you to prepare your article as Draft and than submit it to review in order to avoid it being deleted again. You may check the full flow here Wikipedia:Article wizard. Cheers and Good Luck Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:16, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Contested deletion: TECOM Group

Hi Arthistorian1977, Thanks for your vigilance and appreciate the work. However in this case the article is regarding a company of significance. It employs over 700 people and provides the means for 4,650 businesses to operate and 74,000 people to work. It also owns the company that operates the Arab Radio Network which includes Virgin Radio. It is a major brand and operator in the country. If you look at the businesses it owns & runs then you will see its significance. Tobias mills (talk) 13:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
Thank you for appropriately updating the Xura article - I really appreciate everyone who makes Wikipedia better! stephan.com (talk) 10:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Update Acision? (or merge with Xura?)

Hi there Arthistorian1977!

I noticed that you recently moved Comverse to Xura and made other related edits. Thank you!

I was wondering if you might be interested in making the appropriate changes to Acision, whose merger with Comverse was part of the reason for renaming? One could merge the two pages, though I think it would be more appropriate to continue to have an Acision page in the past tense that notes the merger, similar to the Comverse Technology page. I defer to your judgment.

I would consider doing it, but I work for Xura (not in marketing or anything, a programmer from the Acision side) which may be a conflict of interest, and in any case you seem to a more experienced Wikipedian than I and would do a better job of it. I did update the Comverse name to Xura on the Comverse Technology page, that seems harmless enough :)

I do think it would be better if it were done by someone who has had no exposure to internal company communications... but if you have any questions - perhaps you're looking for citations or something - I'll be glad to help as much as is appropriate. I don't check Wikipedia very often, so feel free to reach out at my personal email, which is found on my user page.

Thank you!

stephan.com (talk) 10:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

I've updated Acision with some information regarding acquisition. I don't think that is has to be merged. The company existed, so encyclopedical knowledge of it has to stay Arthistorian1977 (talk) 16:31, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! stephan.com (talk) 22:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

x10hosting

Hi,

I have removed the promotional content on this article, because of your request. It's just now the article is incredibly bare, just one sentence. Do you have any suggestions of how I might write it so it is not promotional and encyclopaedic? I do not know an awful lot about x10hosting, except what I have gathered from using it. I felt x10hosting deserved an article as it's been around over 10 years and the Comparison of free web hosting services article required an x10hosting article in order for me to add it to the table there. Btw, I hope this doesn't come across as personal, I thought someone would see that article as promotional, just didn't think it would be enough to warrant a deletion.

Thanks for your time, Brenton (contribs · email · talk · uploads) 06:18, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Deleted page Samten Bhutia

Hi, Dear Sir, I have created a page Samten Bhutia, He is a Nepaliese Film Director but unfortunately you have deleted that page, I have created a draft of the same I would be happy if you review it and published it once again, I am leaving a link for the same below. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Samten_Bhutia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sujit.jha3 (talk • contribs) 07:15, 12 October 2015 (UTC) Hi, I glanced at the draft and it looks like a fan site and definitely not an encyclopedic article. Please, look at the articles about other filmmakers and check how are those articles are written. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

65. Lorenz Baumer

Hi,

thank you for noticing me about changes to do on this page, i'm currently working on it and will be pleased to be guided to have a better wiki page.

Xavier — Preceding unsigned comment added by LB Vendome (talk • contribs) 06:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC) Hi Xavier, I suggest you to move the article to the draft space and rework it completely. It looks like heavy promotional fan site and not an encyclopedic article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:01, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Mizrahibait.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mizrahibait.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

The article was moved to AFD for discussion since you're disputed the article. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 06:38, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Xiao Xiangrong article

Hello Arthistorian, this is Zee money. I put links to the Google books website for the two books I think explains his notability. Given his interactions with prominent people in Chinese history such as Lin Biao and Luo Ruiqing, as well as being a high-ranking military officer, please give thought to whether or not to retain the article. Zee money (talk) 14:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Citizens Advice Edinburgh Speedy Deletion contest

Hi Arthistorian1977,

Thanks for inviting me to have a chat about the speedy deletion notice you added to my page. Apologies if I have gone about adding this page in the wrong way, I'm quite new to wikipedia in general.

Since you added the notice I have tried to add more content to the page focussing on the community impact and long standing nature of the charities work in Edinburgh. I feel it is a notable charity that should be included on wikipedia, but of course I may be mistaken!

Thanks a lot,

Callum — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccogden (talk • contribs) 14:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

coordinator

what is unconstructive please explain what is unconstructive coordinator--Owxbyktav (talk) 09:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

@Owxbyktav: You created 2 articles that do not appear to be real, and have no sources to back it up. If the content of the articles are true, please cite credible sources.--Cahk (talk) 09:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
this event is happening now right now there is no source we are waiting for response from Sarajevo--Owxbyktav (talk) 09:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
@Owxbyktav: It is extremely unlikely that the creation of a new independent country is not reported by ANY news organization around the world. --Cahk (talk) 09:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


it is kind of secrete right now we are waiting for response from Sarajevo to declare it publicly --Owxbyktav (talk) 09:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

@Owxbyktav: Those articles you've created a clearly a hoax and vandalism. in addition you've vandalising my talk page as well as articles, I've working on. Please, stop this behaviour or you will be blocked. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

deprod

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Ark TV, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! 2602:30A:2EFE:F050:884:A54E:F6D5:C2AF (talk) 21:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Re: Speedy deletion nomination of The BINGBING

Hi, thanks for your message. I've filled in a reason for contesting the deletion +under https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_BINGBING#Contested_deletion +best regards, Macavalon (talk) 23:21, 5 November 2015 (UTC) +UPDATE... seems the page has been deleted... without any feedback on my contested deletion Macavalon (talk) 10:11, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Petr Pavlensky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FSB. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm MarkYabloko. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Rob Larson, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. MarkYabloko 07:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Winjit Technologies page

I am just starting with this article. We as a community will be editing this page. My purpose to create this Winjit page is just to make sure, people are aware of this company and what it does. As many interesting content I do have about it and I want to make people aware of it. More ediotors are going to join in to make this page more with neutral point of view. I request you to take deletion back, I will try to make it in neutral context — Preceding unsigned comment added by SantoshiWiki (talk • contribs) 07:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Danila Tkachenko, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Russian and Santa Fe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Arthistorian1977/Archive_1&oldid=1252062198"