User talk:Отрок 12

Welcome!

Hello, Отрок 12, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Отрок 12, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! E Wing (talk) 18:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Отрок 12

A tag has been placed on User:Отрок 12 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. E Wing (talk) 18:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Russia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Religion in Russia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Iryna Harpy (talk) 19:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Religion in Russia, you may be blocked from editing. Jamietw (talk) 11:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hey american. if you made world wide web and you posting fake information aout russia on it dont you think that nobody would come and fix it. cheers. --Отрок 12 (talk) 11:40, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Отрок_12 reported by User:Jamietw (Result: ). Thank you. Jamietw (talk) 12:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Religion in Russia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind if you remove unsourced information provided a) you can accommodate anyone who disagrees with it and b) you play nice. You did neither of these. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Religion in Russia that didn't seem very civil, so it should be removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Religion in Russia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:10, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Religion in Russia. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:03, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

I really would be careful. If it is clear you are here to edit war then you can be sanctioned for it before 3 reverts are up. Please take things to the article talk page and discuss rather than reverting all the time. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 13:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I tired to discuss but few other users cant make consensus, they reverting any edits they they dont like, they dont allow to make edits that perfectly fits all wikipedia rules, and they dont allow any discussion on topics. Their politics which seems to me absolute wrong, is that they know better than russians how do russians currently live, thats nonsence. You cant see from abroad better than from here directly. Cheers --Отрок 12 (talk) 00:14, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Religion in Russia. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I have removed your latest comments on the 'Religion in Russia' talk page as broadly construed WP:HARASS. The fact of the matter is that your editing behaviour demonstrates WP:NOTHERE. Should you continue this behaviour, I will take the matter to the WP:ANI. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:07, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Religion in Russia for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:12, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

you made taht page obsolete chat room, i brought important information to discussion which you dont like to hear, so please stop that blaming. i can go on you personal page and write warnings also, cause if go deep to wiki rules you violated few of them. dont judge and you woudnt be judged --Отрок 12 (talk) 21:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Religion in Russia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This WP:BATTLEGROUND behaviour and personal attack is not acceptable. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:37, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

you gonna block me because im trying to fix article which you spoiled? go on. good luck. --Отрок 12 (talk) 21:47, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Russia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Ermenrich (talk) 12:20, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You made false statements 1) there are not any consensus on Russia/Religion in Russia pages. There is few biased authors, one is Ukranian and another is pagan spoiling the page by adding false information and deleting truthfull. 2) you ensured in fact that i anyhow care about this account. if it would be banned i will create new in under 1 minute and you will never prove it's mine.

cheers --Отрок 12 (talk) 23:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 08:04, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For commenting on the users, not on content here and in the edit summary.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Ymblanter (talk) 07:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at the noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Отрок 12 returns. The discussion is about the topic Eastern Orthodox Church. Thank you. - TheLionHasSeen (talk) 16:16, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Giant Snowman 21:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]