User:Prodego/archive/8

Thank you for your support of my RfA

Thank you for your support of my successful request for adminship. I am honoured that the nomination was supported unanimously and that the community expressed confidence that I would use the tools wisely. If you have any concerns please let me know on my talk page. Regards A Y Arktos 02:50, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

R-33

I'd like to clarify things discussed on Talk:Vympel_R-33 --jno 12:25, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

I was talking about this edit. ... OOOPSSS... It was in "older story" section. I've got a flew and this seem affected my ability to concentrate on text :-(. Sorry.
The production version of R-33 has inertial/SARH and that's correct (btw, I have no reliable source for K-37 homing, which is still "under construction" regardless of shows and designers' awards). --jno 12:48, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

I have quoted it in the text: The source: Technics and Munition yesterday, today, tomorrw magazine, №2.06, subscribtion index 71186, monography Home made guided AA missiles by R.Arkhangelski and V.Korovin. --jno 12:50, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Sure, SARH is s "safe bet". I'm just trying to keep things more consistent as the idea of enciclopedia require (im my understanding, of course).
JFYI: there are two russian local magazines "Aviation and Cosmonautics" (Авиация и космонавтика) and "Thechnics and Munition" (Техника и вооружение) which oftem publish excellent monographies dedicated to sertain kinds of russia/ussr-born weapon. I'd recommend them to anyone interested - nowadays, they are much much better (precise) than famous Jane's papers. --jno 13:03, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps, you are right on merge. AFAIK, R-37 itself is sorta journalizm (like, say, Su-47). Just because it was not entered service (the R- prefix is assigned to a missile when it officially enters the service, until then it usually has a K- series index or (now) a sort of PR name like RVV-AE).

Plus, I aint sure the K-37 is intended to fight AWACS. First of all, it's just "the main caliber" of modernized MiG-31M interceptor. The weapon system consisted of MiG-31 and R-33 is intended to cover huge territories (russian north, for instance) were the deployment of SAMs is too difficult (4 MiG-31 can cover 900km of front line). I.e. just to replace Tu-128 with R-4 (K-80) missiles and MiG-25/R-40. The main intention of MiG-31M seem to be improvement the operation characteristics - range, size, and speed of targets it can shot down. _I_ suppose, counter-AWACS-role is one of the possible utilizations of the new features. The other one can be, say, counter-ballistic-missile-role (sort of ABM). --jno 13:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

Thank you! Thank you for your support in my recent RFA. It passed 53/1/2 and I am now an administrator. I appreciate that some of you made exceptions to your usual requirements re length of service and so on because we've interracted positively in the past, or because of my credentials, so I will endeavour to use my new mop cautiously. I'm always open to feedback and gently constructive criticism. If you're not an admin and need some assistance do of course please let me know. Thanks again --kingboyk 00:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

P.S. If you are interested in The Beatles, User:Lar has asked me to tag on a little note advertising the creation of a new Beatles WikiProject that we are currently setting up. Please sign up and help.

RfA/Christopherlin

Thanks for your vote in my recent RfA. It closed (22/11/8). Next time I'm up, I'll be more familar with "the process", and hope to have your support then. --Christopherlin 17:33, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Re : Nomination for adminship for (aeropagitica)

Hello! Thank you for taking the time to vote for me in my recent request for adminship It ended successfully with a final score of (40/10/5). I value all of the contributions made during the process and I will take a special note of the constructive criticism regarding interacting with users in the user talk space. If you have questions or requests, please leave a message.  (aeropagitica)  17:14, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

My RFA

Thanks for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (66/2/3), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you need help, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an admin. Have a nice day! Stifle 17:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

This user thinks it is ironic that thanks for supporting Cyde's successful RFA came in the form of a userbox.

Here's a userbox for you. --Cyde Weys 04:28, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

I'm leaving this macrophage, a particularly hungry white blood cell on your talk page, I just finished a rewrite of its article and realized they're not so different from administrators, as they keep their surroundings clean, doing away with anything that's not supposed to be there...
Anyway, with that short lecture on cell biology done with, I'd like to thank you for your vote on my RfA, which passed with (49/2/0), I'll do my best to not let you down, and if you see me heading towards a common newbie mistake, please nudge me in the right direction :)

--Obli (Talk)^? 20:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

JDoorjam's RfA

Thank you! Hey Prodego/archive/8, thank you for your support in my RfA: it passed with a final tally of 55/1/2. If you want a hand with anything, please gimme a shout. Again, thanks! – JDoorjam Talk 22:00, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Hey Prodego/archive/8, how is it going? Thank you for supporting my Request for adminship! It passed with a final vote of 73/1/1, which means that I have been granted adminship! I look forward to using these tools to enhance and maintain this wonderful site. I will continue regular article/project contributions, but I will also allocate a sizable portion of my wikischedule toward administrative duties :) Thanks again, and if you have any questions/comments/tips, please let me know! — Deckiller 04:50, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

speedy tags

I noticed that another user had removed your speedy tags on The Schoeners. I replaced them and left the user a notice not to remove them again. That said, I really have no opinion on the matter, and I'm not really sure they deserve to be speedied, so I will leave it to you to argue the case. My work here is done. :) See you! Cantara 05:51, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Damn fine job on Oscar.

Fantastic work keeping that up! BD2412 T 04:26, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Hi Pró-de-gó. I wanted to thank you for taking the time to consider my RfA, which passed this morning. If there's ever anything I can help you with, just ask; you know where to find me. ×Meegs 06:31, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

This hippo looks contented.

Thanks for your support in my RfA. It passed, with a final tally of 62/0/1. I'm touched by all the kind comments it attracted, and hope I'll be of some use with my new tools. You know where I am if you need to shout at me. Flowerparty■ 15:42, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

WikiThanks

Thanks for supporting my RFA. I really appreciated the show of support and all the kind words from so many great Wikipedians. I hope I live up to them! -- Vary | Talk 17:53, 12 March 2006 (UTC)