The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93talk 23:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Overall: Nice work on a neglected topic. I don't speak Finnish but verified the source with DeepL Translator. Well done!BorgQueen (talk) 09:55, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Actually, I got carried away. I was copyediting the article myself and then realized that I was getting too involved to be objective. I'd like another reviewer. BorgQueen (talk) 18:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Looks mainly good. I also verified the source and added an explicit mention of black magic into the article body per that source. I don't like that the coven mention is confined only to the lead, where it is unreferenced, and I don't see that word used in the source. I might recommend removing it, or I'm open to hearing a counterargument. Ed[talk][OMT] 02:54, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
@Ed and BorgQueen: I changed that word "coven" to "small group". Of course, let me know if it doesn't sound better to you either. Juustila (talk) 10:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
@Juustila and BorgQueen: Apologies for the confusion my signature caused. I trimmed the coven part of the hook and think this is good to go. Ed[talk][OMT] 15:32, 13 August 2024 (UTC)