Talk:Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed bad section

I removed a bad section as it completely misrepresented the story. the news article here does discuss the group however if someone else wants to use it. Benjiboi 21:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Views on ban of homosexual seminarians

The article should maybe explain what was the initial reaction of SNAP when the Vatican announced a ban on gay seminarians (see Instruction Concerning the Criteria for the Discernment of Vocations with regard to Persons with Homosexual Tendencies in view of their Admission to the Seminary and to Holy Orders). As I seem to recall, SNAP was not entirely satisfied, and some in Rome were apparently criticizing SNAP for hypocrisy, for wanting on one hand an end to clerical pedophilia, and on the other for being slightly opposed to a ban on gay seminarians. ADM (talk) 21:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a way to conflate being gay with pedophilia, which SNAP doesn't readily perpetuate. Instead their work seems to focus on justice issues regardless of a predator's sexuality and exposing the concealment of abuse. -- Banjeboi 03:45, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Documentation of SNAP acceptance of plaintiff attorney donations

In a quotation within a 12/19/2004 AP article in the Beaufort Gazette, David Clohessey of SNAP at the time acknowledged that SNAP had accepted donations from plaintiff's attorneys who worked on abuse cases. I have added a reference for this statement. Ajschorschiii (talk) 03:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Priests? Or is clergy better?

The blue link on the first line of the intro sends one to Priest (Catholic Church), but the article goes on to explain that they have chapters for baptists and other denominations. While the word needs to remain "priests" because that is part of the name of the organization, should it link to clergy instead since the scope of this organization is not just Catholicism?Farsight001 (talk) 21:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No one talking, so I'm going ahead with the change I guess.Farsight001 (talk) 02:24, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 8 2010

I did some work aimed to improve this article:

- eliminated places repeatedly referencing the SNAP homepage and put this homepage under Sources section

- enhanced and improved little the existing text

--Remind me never (talk) 00:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV issues

I have tagged this article for POV issues. The "Controversies" section is too long and not specifically named enough (see WP:CSECTION). Marquardtika (talk) 17:43, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Marquardtika: I cleaned this up a bit. It does still seem like WP:UNDUE to me, but is not as egergious. - Scarpy (talk) 18:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Scarpy: Thanks, your edits definitely look like an improvement! Marquardtika (talk) 18:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]