This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
I still do not see how this is meeting WP:NF. The only coverage we have is from social media posts of those involved (not independent), reprint of a press release from Animation Magazine, a passing mention in an obit and a non-notable blog review (which I have removed today as these should not be used in prose anyways). Can anyone find any actual coverage of this film that would help meet the guideline? BOVINEBOY200823:12, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I added the review[1] it is not The New York Times but what makes you call it a "blog review"? (I didn't see a review for it on CommonSenseMedia.org yet, but it hasn't even been a week.)
It is brand new, only released September 14, 2021. I'd expect sources to be sparse for this kind of direct to video feature. I've no particular interest in keeping or deleting this article but it doesn't seem significantly worse than a whole lot of other DTV articles in general, or the various other Scooby direct-to-video movies in particular. -- 109.79.173.243 (talk) 02:45, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Screen-connections review is not a notable review because it is not done by a nationally known critic. The idea here is not to compare against other articles that exist - some may argue that those may also need to be discussed. We need to make sure this film meets WP:NF if it is going to continue to be a stand-alone article. BOVINEBOY200810:55, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm getting really tired of deleting falsely attributed information. I did not see that the Cartoon Network animation studio helped produce this crossover. Yes, it's the same property of WarnerMedia, but it was never credited in the movie proper (the logo would have appeared in the end). So, for the person that keeps changing it: list sources before adding something. Ромми (talk) 08:55, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Part of the first paragraph says "The film is a crossover between Scooby-Doo and the Cartoon Network show Courage the Cowardly Dog, since the series ended in 2002, followed by a CGI short (titled The Fog of Courage) in 2014." and I think that part should be clarified. Which series? Feels like some words missing. Perhaps change to "The film is a crossover between Scooby-Doo and the Cartoon Network show Courage the Cowardly Dog. The film is the 2nd Courage video released since the Courage series ended in 2002, with an earlier CGI short (titled The Fog of Courage) released in 2014." EarthFurst (talk) 06:03, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]