This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey
This article is within the scope of the Referees WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Referees. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.RefereesWikipedia:WikiProject RefereesTemplate:WikiProject RefereesReferees
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Wow! I hadn't even heard of Auger before reading this article, but the Controversy section is so bad it makes me want to take Auger's side. For all I know, Auger might be terrible, but this reads like a hatchet job. Here's my takeaway from the current three paragraphs:
Paragraph 1. In 2005, Auger was accused of misconduct. The NHL concluded the charge was baseless.
Paragraph 2: In 2010, Auger was accused of misconduct. The league concluded the claim could not be substatiated, and "Referee Auger’s intentions were beyond reproach." Per an earlier cite, the accuser was fined $2,500 for making the accusation.
Paragraph 3: In 2011, Auger was accused of conspiracy. The aritcle says the NHL was looking into the matter, but no disposition is mentioned. At the end of the paragraph, another incident is mentioned, but Auger was found to be not at fault (and there is no citation for this sentence).
This section does a lousy job. It doesn't even offer citations saying the number of accusations is abnormal.
My feeling: remove the section header, cut the wording by 75%, and note that accusations were made against Auger several times in his career, but that all resulted in his being cleared (UNLESS the one in the 2011 incident turned out otherwise, in which case a citation is needed).
