Talk:Shaximiao Formation

A fact from Shaximiao Formation appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 November 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that numerous specimens of dinosaurs have been excavated from the Dashanpu Formation, first discovered by a natural gas company that found the formation's first dinosaur, Gasosaurus?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/November.

Wikipedia

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Shaximiao Formation is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ziliujung

I guess the Ziliujung Formation is 自流井地层 in Chinese, but there are no Google hits for "自流井地层" and "大山铺" on the same page. Wikipeditor 03:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

组 is better. (""大山铺" "自流井组") --Reiner Stoppok (talk) 21:36, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Dashanpo Formation" in Chinese

地层 seems to mean “layer” – is the Chinese name of the Dashanpo paleontological site 大山铺采石场? There's only a single Google hit for that term. There must be a more widely used term, but what is it? Wikipeditor 03:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good thing this is an English encyclopedia huh? I'm just following info I've gathered from various sources. Spawn Man 02:11, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ergh?

Doesn't having Dashanpu redirect here & then having a link to Dashanpu on this page bend the space-time contiuum in some way? Argh! A black hole! Spawn Man 00:19, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a word "Dashanpu Formation" in Chinese?

I don't think so. The word would be 大山铺组, but it is not (really) in use. --Reiner Stoppok (talk) 21:26, 5 September 2008 (UTC) PS: Cf. 大山铺恐龙动物群, 大山铺恐龙化石群遗址 or 大山铺恐龙化石遗址. The article should be called "Dashanpu Dinosaur fossils" or something like that.[reply]

Sanpasaurus

I've read that Upchurch (1995) considers Sanpasaurus a basal sauropod (see also thesis by Philip Mannion). Would it make sense to admit that Sanpasaurus is a valid basal sauropod and not a chimera rather than wait for better material from the Sanpasaurus type horizon?

Upchurch, P. 1995. The evolutionary history of sauropod dinosaurs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, B, 349:365-390.68.4.61.168 (talk) 15:21, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Formations can't contain formations

Is it officially "Dashanpu Group" now? Someone please check. Also, the literature calls the Shaximiao Fms Upper Jurassic, not Middle. David Marjanović (talk) 21:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: the literature calles the Lower Shaximiao Fm Middle Jurassic ( ~ Callovian) and the Upper one Upper Jurassic ( ~ Oxfordian). I still haven't come across "Dashanpu Fm" in the literature. David Marjanović (talk) 19:32, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right, the term Danshanpu seems to be used as a locative nerm, never as a stratigraphic term. In that case, what should the article be renamed to? I think probably reformatting the article to refer soley to the Shaximiao Formation is best Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:53, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Two specimens of Bashanosaurus.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]