Jump to content

Talk:One-upmanship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Relation to similar concept

[edit]
FYI
 – Section heading added by Undead Shambles (talk) 02:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This idea is a development of the Black Cat Bastard concept[1] which was described by David Winston and developed by David Caton Roberts 86.15.101.235 (talk) 13:38, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian reference removed

[edit]

I have looked up the reference to the use of "one-upmanship" in the Canadian Parliament in 1903 and I did not find the word used in the place cited. Therefore I have removed them. The removed sentence and footnote are as follows:

"Exactly when the term originated is unknown; several examples are known from the early 1900s.[1] 

See Debates: Official Report, 1903, 6: 6115, Canadian Parliament, House of Commons."

Page 6115 of the 1903 debates is readable online here http://parl.canadiana.ca/view/oop.debates_HOC0903_03/496?r=0&s=3 - as can be plainly seen, the term "one-upmanship" nor any related term appears on this page. - Metalello talk 19:35, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Un-cited stuff

[edit]

Have removed the following uncited stuff pending corresponding citations, inline or otherwise:

Have reinstated the material removed by above, as the editor in question obviously doesn't know his stuff, nor how to strut it either! AnchorBot (talk) 11:01, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional characters with one-upmanship

[edit]
  • The character Topper from the comic strip Dilbert is a one-upper.
  • The character Clem from the comic strip Rose is Rose is a one-upper.
  • Kristen Wiig's character, Penelope, on Saturday Night Live is an egomaniac who compulsively one-ups everyone around her.

--Technopat (talk) 10:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joneses?

[edit]

Should there be some mention of "keeping up with the Joneses" in this article? It seems a quintessential example of one-upsmanship. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.190.218.69 (talk) 10:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Up vs. Ups

[edit]

I did Google searches today, and there seem to be more hits for "one-upsmanship" -"one-upmanship" than vice versa. I thought it was a canonical example of the connective "s" in compound words. --24.130.210.201 (talk) 21:13, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Psychology????

[edit]

I suppose so, but you must remember that the book was intended as HUMOUR! Its inclusion as a psychology stub is questionable. Will Wodehouse or Saki or Bierce be defined as social history? 80.222.132.98 (talk) 21:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My prime example of Wikipedia one-upmanship was removed! I bet you feel one-up

[edit]

My addition read as follows: "The cat and mouse game between Wikipedia vandals and genuine users reverting changes can be considered a form of one-upmanship: a systematic and conscious practice of "creative intimidation", in which vandals can be one-up upon defacing a page, and moderators can be one-up when they use their elevated Wikipedia Laissez-Passer status to remove the vandalism." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.193.6.129 (talk) 21:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about the books, or the man who wrote them

[edit]

The term has been used since (at least) 1903. So why does this article read like a review of Stephen Potter's work? He's not the progenitor of the word, although he may have popularised it. The article gets quite out of hand, the following two lines have no relation to the concept whatsoever! Weasel words, fluff, you name it - it's there.

"Potter's unprincipled principles apply to almost any possession, experience or situation, deriving maximum undeserved rewards and discomforting the opposition. The 1960 film School for Scoundrels and the 2006 film School For Scoundrels were satiric portrayals of how to use Potter's ideas."

Tomásdearg92 (talk) 02:22, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One upping

[edit]

I think one upping, one upmanship comes from the medieval term that allowed certain factions once a year to mark swans with notches on the beak, those that weren't marked then became property of the king or queen who was reigning at the time. This was actually called Swan upping and I think it's feasible that it's be affected by dialect or pronunciation over time. MattBFC (talk) 20:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on One-upmanship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:One-upmanship&oldid=1254944352"