This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Two persons are quoted who endorse the nomination of Neomi Rao to become the administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA): Jonathan H. Adler and Susan Dudley. Why are these persons mentioned at all? This is a political nomination. Quoting people who endorse her nomination is not a neutral point of view and therefore in my opinion against Wikipedia rules. Wereldburger758 (talk) 05:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I added that commentary from The Hill and Washington Post. I thought it noteworthy because of the sourcing and the fact that Dudley previously held the position Rao was nominated for. You're welcome to add commentary of people opposing the nomination--there wasn't any in the sourcing I found, which is why I didn't add it myself. Marquardtika (talk) 16:27, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Rao was the dissent in a 2-1 ruling" on Trump's taxes...
The quotes from the ruling probably don't belong as-is because they aren't cited from a reliable secondary source. First, they aren't directly sourced to anything. The ruling is embedded in the previous citation but that's not obvious when looking at the quotes. Second, the ruling itself is a primary source, which is inappropriate for this purpose (WP:USINGPRIMARY). Including the quotes without context isn't appropriate and, since there is no context in the ruling, adding more context directly would be original research. I propose that any further information about the ruling and Rao's dissent, including quotations from the ruling, be sourced to reliable analyses.
