Talk:Michael Moon (EastEnders)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

EastEnders

This article is within the scope of WikiProject EastEnders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the popular BBC soap opera EastEnders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EastEndersWikipedia:WikiProject EastEndersTemplate:WikiProject EastEndersEastEnders

Tasks for WikiProject EastEnders:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Expand : All articles listed in Category:Stub-Class EastEnders articles and Category:EastEnders articles in need of real-world perspective
Other :
- Improve to FA standard: EastEnders: E20
- Improve to GA standard: EastEnders
- Maintain: List of EastEnders characters (2023), List of EastEnders characters, List of former EastEnders characters, List of awards and nominations received by EastEnders
- Get involved in the Wikipedia EastEnders Project.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

Sources

If Michael ever takes revenge on Phil, we could include these sources: Shepherd: 'Michael likes to wind Phil up'; 'Enders star: 'Michael will bide his time'. –anemone projectors– 18:05, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SJS interview on BBC Breakfast –anemone projectors– 14:35, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Michael's Age

Why is Michael's date of birth not recorded as 1972? Michael has stated that he was six years old when his mother died and we know that his mother died in 1978 as it was mentioned onscreen, the exact date being 13 September 1978. Surely this is enough proof that Michael was born in 1972, if you know your maths so why is it that whenever I record the date, it keeps being reverted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.41.198 (talk) 16:16, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He was six years old but he could have been six years and one day, or six years and 360 days, giving different years of birth. We can't say either way. –anemone projectors– 13:35, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Storyline section

The storyline section is massive - relatively new character should not have this much plot detail - maybe someone should try to chop it down.Rain the 1 16:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I nominate you :P –anemone projectors– 16:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I can do it? GSorby – Ping 18:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It would be for the best. I'm busy with other articles atm.Rain the 1 18:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone can do it :D –anemone projectors– 13:23, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There we go, it took a long bloody time but I've condensed it by about 75%. GSorby – Ping 20:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I hope it's all in order cos I'm not checking. I'm sure it is though. What about all the lovely sections that you added to the development section? Why did you get rid of them? –anemone projectors– 13:27, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The looked too lacking of text to have their own section, it looked rather shabby... GSorby – Ping 19:11, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough :) –anemone projectors– 15:39, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]