Talk:Messenia

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Greece Mid‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

"mingling of races"?!?

"But the fertility of the soil, the warm and genial climate, the MINGLING OF RACES and the absence of opposition, combined to render the Messenians no match for their hardy and warlike neighbours of Sparta." Who is reponsible for this travesty??? Anyway I took it out. thestor 07:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you can blame the 1911 Britannica for that one. Or an extreme Spartophile. --Akhilleus (talk) 07:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose so. Well really, their standards and knowledge are quite different from ours. That was 100 years ago now. I always try to rewrite Britannica whenever I can. It is an expedient here and sometimes it works but usually it can only be considered a temporary measure. After all if people wanted to see Britannica, why would they not go directly to Britannica?Dave (talk) 12:06, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The 2005 population

I don't know where that figure comes from and the editor is not saying. I try to look it up on the Internet and all I get are dozens of repetitions of WP. This is no way to run life on the Internet. There ought to be a law. The census is taken every 10 years in the first year of the decade. There is one being taken this year. Meanwhile the government itself is using the 2001 census and most of the other numbers in this article are 2001. Without a source I am putting the number back to 2001. This is only a temporary measure as by early next year everyone will be changing everything to the 2011 numbers. If you really insist on the 2005 number, source, please. And, please don't use the WP copycats.Dave (talk) 10:08, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

History Section

The history section is clearly NOT up to wikipedian standards, it's an unreadable mass of text quite clearly directly copied from somewhere which is not clearly accredited. Any thoughts on this? 87.210.14.58 (talk) 09:58, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Messenia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150916205622/http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive to https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=ajJ0yYcU43FQ

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]