Talk:GMTV

Television: British / Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as High-importance).

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

YouTube Videos

Do YouTube videos count as citations? If so, there's a number of news reports from the 16th October 1991 which lead with the ITV franchises - either from ITN painting a national picture, or regional news bulletins from stations which lost their franchise that day. There's also a video of the first GMTV show which clearly identifies the anchors.82.35.190.189 (talk) 02:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement

This suspected copyright infringement refers to the Schedule section within the article, not the article itself. Under the Broadcasting Act 1990, to use BBC, ITV and Channel 4 schedules requires a royality to be paid to the broadcaster (collected by Broadcasting Dataservices). Failure to do so is a criminal offence. I have started a discussion here: Potential legal issue with UK Radio station schedules within articles. If it is a copyvio, the section will be removed immediately. --tgheretford (talk) 23:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The suspected copyvio is in all edits made after 01:16 March 14, 2006 (UTC) [1]

I whipped the offending section out. As Tghe says, this is potentially a copyvio. However, even without the copyvio worries, it is clearly original research and unencyclopedic in tone. So we can lose it without the article losing anything of note. ➨ ЯEDVERS 16:16, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I had to remove another schedule (diff). --tgheretford (talk) 19:09, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And again (diff). See the updated discussion link on UK TV and radio schedules here. --tgheretford (talk) 20:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The logo shown is copied directly off the website and isn't generally considered to be the proper thing. Bilky asko 14:13, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GMTV is not widely considered to be a "National Institution" MRSC 09:53, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)

How come-err there is-err no mention-err of John-err Stapleton ? 160.84.253.241

How do you site a reference?

Lucy Steele 09:54, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You cite a reference like this <ref>Mr Mcgoo said this</ref>. Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 11:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

Several references in this article come from tabloid newspapers. For example, the one about the GMTV Kids presenters leaving was from the Daily Mirror. Last time I checked, such sources were considered unreliable. The fact is correct, they did leave, but "made redundant"? For all we know, their contracts were simply about to end. Digifiend (talk) 18:06, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITV Breakfast Limited

GMTV Limited has now been renamed as ITV Breakfast Limted. Should we rename this article as ITV Breakfast or create a new one?
GMc^talk 00:03, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would opt for the latter, and make it clear in the article about the rename. -- [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 12:43, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well it's just a name change really, so shouldn't the page just be renamed, the same information on the GMTV page as a company away from the show, would be the same information for ITV Breakfast as a company. Tom Southwell (talk) 00:22, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, GMTV is totally different to ITV breakfast.

GMTV Ltd. was a separate breakfast station complete to ITV breakfast, and was not a simple name change. Therefore the page should remain separate.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.81.115 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 8 January 2015

Please note that the above discussions, are before the Merge tag was added in December 2014. -- [[ axg // ✉ ]] 15:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Live stream

Live stream for the last show ? --93.82.10.27 (talk) 08:35, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GMTV

In 6 January 2013, GMTV Might come back — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.196.84.166 (talk) 16:09, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GMTV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717191426/http://www.iii.co.uk/news/?type=afxnews&articleid=7645134&action=article to http://www.iii.co.uk/news/?type=afxnews&articleid=7645134&action=article

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on GMTV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:54, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Film awards

Watching this morning I must say Sidney Poitier. Was a fantastic actor that’s why he won awards ,the same as many other black actors Eddie Murphy dentil Washington the guy who played shaft Oprah Winfrey in the colour purple these people won because they deserved to Surely awards should be won on merit not colour ,I would want to win because of a fantastic performance not my race ,it’s the same with jobs now shouldn’t the job go to the person most able and would fit in because of their ability not to make up the numbers and that works both ways black white asian amongst others Carol beasley [email protected] 2A02:C7F:F68D:4700:DC0A:B520:D47E:2EDB (talk) 07:29, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]