Talk:Fort Carlton

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fort Carlton article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Canada: Saskatchewan Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.

Military history: Fortifications / Canadian / North America

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Infobox

There is a choice between using Infobox Military Structure and Template:Infobox Protected area Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 04:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 November 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 10:29, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Carlton → Fort Carlton Provincial Park – Fort Carlton Provincial Park is the correct name for the article. All of the provincial parks in Saskatchewan use the phrase Provincial Park, including the one other fort, Fort Pitt Provincial Park. See: List of protected areas of Saskatchewan#Provincial parks. I tried moving it myself but it wouldn't let me, so I need help. Thanks! Masterhatch (talk) 00:51, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Polyamorph (talk) 10:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments moved from WP:RM/T below.Polyamorph (talk) 10:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm not sure about doing this one, because the article isn't just about the national park - it's also about things that existed in that place under the name Fort Carlton before the national park. Dr. Vogel (talk) 01:27, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Masterhatch: I agree with DrVogel on this one; it appears that the article is mainly about the fort itself and its history, so the move is not uncontroversial. Lennart97 (talk) 09:18, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Fair enough. Masterhatch (talk) 10:28, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The article is mainly about the fort itself. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:35, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Canada has been notified of this discussion. VR _talk 03:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, as noted above, the article is about the fort and makes very little mention of the park around the site. PK T(alk) 13:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.