Talk:Devolution (Brooks novel)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptozoology, an attempt to improve coverage of the pseudoscience and subculture of cryptozoology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CryptozoologyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptozoologyTemplate:WikiProject CryptozoologyCryptids articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels: Sci-fi Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: 50,000 Challenge

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

Disputed

Book was announced in August of 2019 and published June of 2020. I find it hard to believe it was a COVID metaphor as the book was almost surely written before March 2020. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎ 2Skupz (talk • contribs) 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Seems plausible to me, the author may well have been writing through early 2020. He says he was advised of the China outbreak in January by a Navy officer [1] (Brooks is affiliated with West Point). ☆ Bri (talk) 16:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interpretation of the book’s theme

@Bri states that Brooks knew about the coronavirus in January from a Navy Officer he allegedly knows. The hyperlink citation leads to an article from USA Today. The article never mentions this.

That aside, I felt there were also themes of environmentalism, classism, over reliance on technology, humankind vs nature, effects of denial vs paranoia, and many others. It’s up to the reader to decide.

Ultimately, there is no way to know if the book is an allegory for COVID unless Brooks says so himself and it can be cited. To state this book is an allegory for COVID is untruthful.

Recommended revision: use what Brooks’s publisher used for their marketing synopsis found on the back of the book. 2601:1C0:C803:C950:0:0:0:CF6E (talk) 08:07, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]