Talk:Culm Measures is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles
See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:
Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Not as far as I'm aware. My sources give alternative derivations as from Old English col, meaning coal, or Welsh cwlwm, meaning knot (because of the contorted folding of these deposits). --Portnadler09:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have added something to this effect. The two do get confused. Ironically, the origin of their names may be linked as both may be derived from cwlwm meaning knot. If this is true in river's case it is the meanders that lead to this name.--NHSavage (talk) 20:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've moved the section on the National Character Area from the article on the River Culm to this article. It's clear that the NCA was named for, and covers broadly the same area as, the Culm Measures, not the river which is in a different part of Devon (close, but no cream tea). Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:38, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted the undiscussed change of article title to the uncapitalised form. In my experience the term usually has capitals for both C and M - see for example here, here, here, here, and here. But, we should discuss it further here. Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:36, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oldest and newest books prefer lowercase measures, while most 20th century books cap. See [1] and [2]. It's not at all clear why Measures is capped, but Culm is (perhaps) a name in addition to a local term for the soft coal there. Dicklyon (talk) 01:21, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect - but have no sources to back up the thought - that some authorities thought that the name originated from the River Culm rather than the substance "culm", and capitalised it accordingly. Then, having capitalised the first word, they or others capitalised the second word for consistency. So, a lower case form may be historically accurate, but I don't think it's what most recent or current sources apply, and if we here try to use lower case, without a clear justification from reliable sources, we appear to be prioritising WP style over real-world practice - which is something I would oppose. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think the BGS Lexicon always capitalises, and I also think we should defer to them on this sort of thing, as being a real world reliable source. I also think that some of these discussions on capitalisation tend to wander off into angels on pinheads territory. DuncanHill (talk) 22:03, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
