Talk:Borotba

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Source 9, article by Egor Putilov: The journalist has since been exposed as a desinformer. This has been noted in a warning at Aftonbladets web page for that article. Maybe it should effect this wikipedia article or should be noted... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.217.41.188 (talk) 11:51, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV dispute

Somebody in a "drive-by tagging"-style introduced a NPOV tag to this article without any explanation which is not nice. So, according to the WP rules could you please "clearly and exactly explain which part of the article does not seem to have a NPOV and why. Make some suggestions as to how one can improve the article." Thank you, --Nabak (talk) 13:09, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's kind of hard to make everybody happy especially when it comes to highly disputed events and organisations at the time of war. There will be by nature few "neutral" secondary sources. So the best you can do is to represent both views of the issue, in this case the pro-Russian and the pro-Ukrainian stance which completely shed a different light on what Borot'ba actually is. For one side they are antifascists and radical left, for the others they are reactionary pro-Russian nationalists. When I found the article, it still had a strong bias towards the Pro-Russian POV. --Mcleinn (talk) 20:52, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Borotba is an interesting and developing phenomenon with limited coverage in the press. You are cordially invited to participate in a discussion to determine which sources can be used in the article. Be bold! --Nabak (talk) 13:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and for starters I would recommend to translate the following serious and detailed article from the Ukrainian anarchist platform nihilist.li into English: From petty criminals to murderers. Essay on the political evolution of the stalinists on the example of the organization Borot'ba. Besides that you should follow German news. The Borotba leader Sergej Kiritchuk now lives in Berlin, where he tries to "open doors" for pro-Russian groups to the German left. Recently it was discovered that Kiritchuk tried to organise a lecture of two neo-nazis from Russian National Unity at a leftist cultural center. When German antifascists found out they were duped, the event was cancelled. See the following German article on Indymedia: Von Borot'ba vermittelte Nazi-Veranstaltung abgesagt And, even more recently, the regional liaison office of the federal German LEFT party distanced itself for these and other reasons from Borot'ba and cancelled joined events in Hamburg and Lübeck: [1] and [2] --Mcleinn (talk) 20:36, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Borotba is not interesting and not developing.... Following Ukrainian politics for years now and wp:or made it clear to me the organization is just like FEMEN: they make a lot of noise outside Ukraine (and thus get attention there) but inside Ukraine nobody cares what they do or want... Kharkiv and Odessa at one point could have been an exception; but I believe they lie a lot about there influence on (past) events in Ukraine on their website.... and some gullible extreme left winging Westerners echo their extrapolations on their websites. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 23:20, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Borotba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Borotba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]