Talk:Billingen
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reasons not to delete
[edit]I've added some more stuff (from the German and Swedish wiki) to make this article somewhat more comprehensive. The Billingen is one of Southern Swedens largest mountains and I think it deserves an article. Bronks 09:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Mountain?
[edit]Billingen can't by definition be a mountain as it's not high enough —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.243.199.166 (talk) 17:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
And yet everyone calls it a mountain and have done so for recorded history. What's the defined minimum height of a mountain, anyway?
Not that it is relevant for the article or anything – the article is relevant because Billingen (and the other mountains in a 50 km radius around it) is distinctive as a landscape feature, and in the geology, biology and climatology of the area. JöG (talk) 13:28, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Billingen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071103203134/http://skovde.se:80/templates/S_PictureList.aspx?id=15915 to http://www.skovde.se/templates/S_PictureList.aspx?id=15915
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)