Jump to content

Talk:A Study in Pink

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Episode articles?

[edit]

Do we really need an episode article? Is there sufficient information available to about this specific episode that doesn't belong in the main article? The JPStalk to me 15:46, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Episode image ?

[edit]

Hi, I apologize. I'm probably not following proper procedures for editing a wiki. I've never done this before, but I'd like to pose a question: do the article editors really want to keep a "spoiler"-ish image for the episode icon? I'm only a user visiting the page, but the image of the cabbie with the pills gives away the climax. 141.106.128.40 (talk) 07:10, 2 January 2012 (UTC) anonymous [I'm sorry I don't have a username. Please don't block my IP. I won't do this again.][reply]

Details

[edit]

So many little funny details emerge when comparing A Study in Scarlet with a Study in Pink. Their should be a section in the article comparing them. The word Rache(l) is particularly noteworthy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.51.38 (talk) 23:52, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Analysis needs to be supported by reference to reliable sources, otherwise it is a breach of our original research policy. The JPStalk to me 18:11, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

synopsis

[edit]

Seems far too long and detailed to me, are there guidelines on length? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.194.44.248 (talk) 15:14, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out. WP:TVPLOT suggests that plot sections in articles about a TV episode should be around 200 to 500 words. The synopsis as it currently stands is 4,019 words long, which is unacceptable for the copyright reasons listed at WP:TVPLOT. A single editor, presumably acting in good faith, recently increased the length of the plot summary drastically, more than doubling the size of the entire article. Before this, the plot summary was 890 words long: still overlong, but much more acceptable.
The plot summaries in the articles on the other 2 Sherlock episodes were also extended at around the same time. I am going to revert all three articles back to where they were before they were increased so drastically in size, and then see if I can do anything to cut them still further. (For the record, The Blind Banker is currently 3,068 words and had been 575 words; The Great Game is currently 2,324 words and had been 1,522 words, with an "all plot" tag that the user disregarded.) Princess Lirin (talk) 00:37, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on A Study in Pink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on A Study in Pink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:A_Study_in_Pink&oldid=1197190651"