Jump to content

Steven L. West

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Steven L. West
CitizenshipAmerican
Alma materUniversity of Tennessee, Texas Tech University
Years activeLate 1990s to Present
EmployerUniversity of Memphis
Known forPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation research

Steven L. West is an American research scientist and rehabilitation counselor specializing in addictions issues among persons with disabilities.[1][2][3][4] He is a Professor in the Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology and Research at the University of Memphis in Memphis, TN.[5]

Education

[edit]

He trained as a rehabilitation counselor at the University of Tennessee where his mentor was James H. Miller, a noted rehabilitation counselor and rehabilitation educator. At UT West began his initial research into addictions issues and people with disabilities. He later completed his doctoral studies at the Texas Tech University under the mentorship of Dr. Alan Reifman.

Professional service

[edit]

As an advocate for persons with disabilities, he served as a member of the Virginia Department of Rehabilitative Services' Human Research Review Committee[6] In 2014, West began serving a five-year term as a member of the board of directors of the Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification, the national certifying organization for professional rehabilitation counselors; he is Past President of the Board.[7] He is currently a member of the Board of Directors of the National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants (NCCPA) Foundation, a 501c(3) charitable nonprofit organization that designs solutions for improving the capacity of certified PAs to impact quality and accessibility of health care delivery.[8]

Research

[edit]

Addiction Issues Among Persons with Disabilities

[edit]

West is a leading scholar on substance abuse treatment access for persons with disabilities (PWDs). Along with colleagues at Virginia Commonwealth University, West pioneered the self-report assessment of the impact of access barriers to substance abuse treatment in two studies considering persons spinal cord injury, or SCI, and a number of other disabilities. In the first of these efforts, service denials based on physical inaccessibility to individuals with SCI and traumatic brain injury (TBI), were explored in a sample of 144 substance abuse treatment providers in the Mid-Atlantic region.[9] Self-report surveys to these counselors asked about the number of individuals with these two types of disabilities who sought but who were denied services due to the presence of physical barriers in the respondent's treatment location. Although the number of individuals with these types of disabilities who presented for treatment was relatively small, the percentage of denials was notable. In sum, 55% of individuals with SCI and 42% of individuals with TBI who presented for treatment were declined services due to physical barriers in the respondents’ treatment locations. The denial of services based on physical barriers was not related to practice affiliation (private or public) or practice type (outpatient, non-medical residential, or hospital-based).

He extended these findings by assessing treatment denials experienced by individuals with a variety of disabilities including persons with multiple sclerosis (MS), muscular dystrophy (MD), non-paralytic mobility impairment, SCI, and TBI.[10] As in their first treatment denial study, West and colleagues mailed surveys to licensed treatment professionals (n = 200), this time in a single state, asking about the number of individuals with one of the target disabilities who sought but were denied services due to barriers in the respondent’s treatment location. A total of 800 individuals with one of the target disabilities sought treatment from these providers, of whom 527 (66%) were denied care due to the presence of barriers. Denial rates across all disability groups were: 87% for MS, 75% for MD, 65% for non-paralytic mobility impairments, 67% for SCI, and 68% for TBI. Alternately, when viewed from the perspective of treatment providers, generally high rates of service denials were also evidenced. A total of 51 respondents were approached by someone with TBI seeking services; 37 of these respondents (73%) declined services to at least one such individual. Overall denial rates from this perspective ranged from a low of 67% for individuals with MD to a high of 91% for those with MS, with an overall denial rate of 72%. West and his colleagues conducted the first such evaluation of treatment denials in the United Kingdom and found denial rates based on disability status to be equal to or greater than those found in U.S. substance abuse treatment facilities.

West has also been instrumental in developing a body of research to indicate that the number of barriers to access in substance abuse treatment facilities is numerous. In a national self-report survey of treatment centers in the United States, he and his colleagues found rates of access barriers to be commonplace.[11] 33 Using a self-report survey, respondents were queried not only about the physical accessibility of their facilities, but also about the programmatic accessibility of their services. Substantial numbers of barriers to physical access were found. Some 20% of respondents reported that they did not have accessible restrooms, about 25% did not have accessible entrances, and 26% of residential centers did not have accessible bathing facilities. The vast majority (84%) of all facilities did not have anyone on staff that could use American Sign Language (ASL) or signed English. Similarly, most (95%) could not produce materials in Braille, nor did the majority maintain Braille or other accessible format materials (88%). The respondents also overwhelmingly acknowledged that they were uncertain as to how to obtain interpreter services or alternate format materials. He and his colleagues replicated such findings with samples of treatment providers in Great Britain and Canada as well.[12][13]

He was awarded the Young Investigator Award by the American Society of Addiction Medicine in 2005.[14][15]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ "Barriers to addiction treatment and related service denials to persons with disabilities: A multinational perspective". www.exchangesupplies.org. Archived from the original on 24 April 2008. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  2. ^ "Csam.org" (PDF). Csam.org. Retrieved 22 June 2019.
  3. ^ "APHA: June 2004 AJPH Press Release". Archived from the original on 2011-01-03. Retrieved 2010-07-01.
  4. ^ PhD, Dr Elizabeth Da Silva Cardoso; PhD, Dr Julie A. Chronister (16 June 2009). Understanding Psychosocial Adjustment to Chronic Illness and Disability: A Handbook for Evidence-Based Practitioners in Rehabilitation. Springer Publishing Company. ISBN 9780826123879. Retrieved 22 June 2019 – via Google Books.
  5. ^ "Contact Counseling, Educational Psychology and Research". Memphis.edu. Retrieved 22 June 2019.
  6. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). www.vadrs.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 November 2007. Retrieved 17 January 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  7. ^ "CRCC Leadership: CRCC Board of Directors". Crccertification.com. Retrieved 15 October 2018.
  8. ^ "nccPA Health Foundation". nccpa.net/nccPAHealthFoundation. Retrieved 14 April 2020.
  9. ^ West, S. L., Luck, R. S., & Capps, C. F. (2007). Physical inaccessibility negatively impacts the treatment participation of persons with disabilities. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 1494-1497.
  10. ^ West, S. L., Graham, C. W., & Cifu, D. X. (2009). Rates of substance abuse treatment denials to persons with physical disabilities due to accessibility concerns. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 27, 305–316.
  11. ^ West, S. L. (2007). Limited access for persons with disabilities in addictions treatment in the U.S. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33, 1-5.
  12. ^ West, S. L., Graham, C. W., & Cifu, D. X. (2009). Physical and programmatic accessibility of British substance abuse treatment centers. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 27, 294–304.
  13. ^ West, S. L., Graham, C. W., & Cifu, D. X. (2009). Rates of persons with disabilities in addictions treatment in Canada. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 27, 253–264.
  14. ^ "Not Found". Archived from the original on 2019-06-22. Retrieved 2019-06-22.
  15. ^ "ASAM - American Society of Addiction Medicine" (PDF). www.asam.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 February 2012. Retrieved 17 January 2022.