User contributions for Tikitorch2

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

02:0202:02, 2 October 2024 diff hist +458 Sunetra Gupta Edited in text source characterization to indicate the comparison was to other results published in 2020, and added two more recent sources to justify this change Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

10:3610:36, 27 June 2024 diff hist +24 Sunetra Gupta The source only notes that the one and ten thousand lower bound was inconsistent with deaths/uk population up to that point. Because the IFR decreased after 2020 due to immunity, it is important to specify the spring to 2020 to make it a verifiable fact and consistent with the next sentence. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
02:5402:54, 27 June 2024 diff hist +1,062 User talk:Tikitorch2 →June 2024: Reply current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
02:2902:29, 27 June 2024 diff hist +27 Sunetra Gupta Weakened the false claim reinserted by Bon Courage in order to make it true while still retaining it to minimize impact to the narrative. Previous claim had inaccurately summarized the cited source. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

02:2702:27, 25 June 2024 diff hist −81 Martin Kulldorff Undid harmful and likely false allegation. Again other editors have noted the source is an opinion article and its claims should not be stated as encyclopedic fact. This has certainly been an interesting foray into Wikipedia, interestingly Geogsage ended up putting bias against Kulldorff over their own initial, more professional proposed text. Also ironically, this "consensus" text still includes the obvious straw man fact, so readers can still tell Wikipedia editors have an agenda. Tags: Undo Reverted

10:5710:57, 21 June 2024 diff hist −81 Martin Kulldorff Undid revision 1230163852 by Newimpartial (talk) It is only 1AM if you ignore the other editor with the same conclusion on the BLPN discussion...so a 2AM (vs M<=3) edit to prevent casting aspersion on Kulldorff in Wikivoice based on a false premise Tags: Undo Reverted
01:3801:38, 21 June 2024 diff hist −81 Martin Kulldorff There is a talk page and BLPN discussion if you have a scientific study on which to base this damaging assertion. Otherwise there is unlikely to be consensus on this false allegation, originally posited in an opinion article. 2/5 (or 3/5 maybe) editors who have discussed this on BLPN disagreed with the change. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

00:0200:02, 18 June 2024 diff hist −79 Martin Kulldorff Undid revision 1229270936 by Newimpartial (talk) Only one out of five editors concurred and one (myself) disagreed. Despite lacking consensus, they made the change. The remaining two of five have not weighed in to the most-recent proposed text, but at least one likely would disagree. No consensus has emerged to include this damaging and false accusation in Wikivoice without attribution. Tags: Undo Reverted

19:5719:57, 15 June 2024 diff hist −79 Martin Kulldorff Undid revision 1229217322 by Writ Keeper (talk) due to lack of consensus. Only 2/5 editors involved in the discussion thread on the BLPN noticeboard have agreed. A third likely would also concur but has previously stonewalled so difficult to tell. Either way, consensus has not been achieved because this allegation has no scientific basis and should be attributed to Howard to be included. Tags: Undo Reverted