User contributions for KumiokoCleanStart
Appearance
Results for KumiokoCleanStart talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 35,532 edits. Account created on 26 March 2013.
27 January 2014
- 22:4522:45, 27 January 2014 diff hist +892 User talk:Razr Nation →RFA Comments: Reply
- 22:3522:35, 27 January 2014 diff hist +291 User talk:Razr Nation →RFA Comments: I removed the oppose vote since it meant so much
- 22:2422:24, 27 January 2014 diff hist +180 User talk:Newyorkbrad →My RFA comments: I removed my oppose and that whole useless part of the discussion
- 22:2322:23, 27 January 2014 diff hist −2,299 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Yaris678 →Oppose: Fuck it, I'll just remove it
- 22:2122:21, 27 January 2014 diff hist +502 User talk:Razr Nation →RFA Comments: Reply
- 22:1722:17, 27 January 2014 diff hist +84 User talk:Newyorkbrad →My RFA comments: ++
- 22:1522:15, 27 January 2014 diff hist +1,997 User talk:Newyorkbrad →My RFA comments: Reply
- 21:3221:32, 27 January 2014 diff hist +1,375 User talk:Razr Nation →RFA Comments: Reply
- 21:2021:20, 27 January 2014 diff hist +1,518 User talk:Newyorkbrad →My RFA comments: new section
- 21:1321:13, 27 January 2014 diff hist +203 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Yaris678 →Oppose: Reply to NYB
- 20:0220:02, 27 January 2014 diff hist +1,605 User talk:Razr Nation →RFA Comments: Reply
- 19:5219:52, 27 January 2014 diff hist +689 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Yaris678 →Oppose: Reply to Hahc and Calmer waters
- 19:4819:48, 27 January 2014 diff hist +1,086 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Administrators lack the subject matter expertise to interpret 'broadly construed': I agree and my 2 cents
- 19:3819:38, 27 January 2014 diff hist +821 User talk:Razr Nation →RFA Comments: new section
- 18:5218:52, 27 January 2014 diff hist +580 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Yaris678 →Oppose: Oppose for not having the technical proficiency needed for adminship
26 January 2014
- 13:2913:29, 26 January 2014 diff hist +140 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3/Bureaucrat discussion →"Fair to Sarek": And it is a bad idea
- 13:2713:27, 26 January 2014 diff hist +499 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3/Bureaucrat discussion →"Fair to Sarek": They really just want to remove my Oppose vote
- 05:2705:27, 26 January 2014 diff hist +803 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3/Bureaucrat discussion →"Fair to Sarek": We shouldn't even be having these discussions. Its only because he was an admin for crying out loud. The RFA failed, he can try again later.
- 03:5803:58, 26 January 2014 diff hist +137 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Promotion of clerk Rschen7754: Sure anything for you John
- 03:5403:54, 26 January 2014 diff hist +297 User talk:KumiokoCleanStart →Personal attacks: Reply
- 02:3102:31, 26 January 2014 diff hist +185 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Promotion of clerk Rschen7754: Yeah I could have said worse and I know he/she doesn't think any better of me.
- 01:2101:21, 26 January 2014 diff hist +883 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Still nothing about dealing with admin abuse: Reply to Roger
- 01:1501:15, 26 January 2014 diff hist +67 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Relevant comment unworthy of collapsing: fix wording
- 01:1301:13, 26 January 2014 diff hist +959 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Relevant comment unworthy of collapsing: I'm not angry at your comments, I just think your making yourself look stupid
- 00:5100:51, 26 January 2014 diff hist +1,265 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Still nothing about dealing with admin abuse: Reply to NE Ent
25 January 2014
- 23:5623:56, 25 January 2014 diff hist +206 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Promotion of clerk Rschen7754: Not surprising but it wouldn't have been my choice
- 20:3520:35, 25 January 2014 diff hist +625 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3/Bureaucrat discussion →What the 'book' says: Its still not right to treat admins to a lower standard than editors.
- 19:3519:35, 25 January 2014 diff hist +1 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3/Bureaucrat discussion →What the 'book' says: Fix indent
- 19:3519:35, 25 January 2014 diff hist +403 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3/Bureaucrat discussion →What the 'book' says: My 2 cents
- 19:2619:26, 25 January 2014 diff hist +787 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3/Bureaucrat discussion →This is wrong: Comment to Kurtis
- 19:1219:12, 25 January 2014 diff hist +749 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3/Bureaucrat discussion →Misses the mark: new section
- 19:0819:08, 25 January 2014 diff hist +1,045 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3 →Voting patterns are highly suspicious: Comment to Bishonen
- 18:5818:58, 25 January 2014 diff hist +1,962 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Still nothing about dealing with admin abuse: Reply to Salvio
- 18:2418:24, 25 January 2014 diff hist +2,639 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Admins not caring to prove or legitimate their "rulings": Reply
- 13:5113:51, 25 January 2014 diff hist +325 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3 →Voting patterns are highly suspicious: I find it suspicious as well
- 13:3513:35, 25 January 2014 diff hist +979 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Admins not caring to prove or legitimate their "rulings": Reply to Resolute who really isn't helping the discussion and should move on
- 13:2913:29, 25 January 2014 diff hist +759 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Relevant comment unworthy of collapsing: Reply to Resolutes nonsense one more time
- 01:5001:50, 25 January 2014 diff hist +712 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Admins not caring to prove or legitimate their "rulings": Sorry Wikid, I just don't have sympathy for a self inflicted problem
- 01:4001:40, 25 January 2014 diff hist +374 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Admins not caring to prove or legitimate their "rulings": Their supposed to but it frequently doesn't happen
- 01:0101:01, 25 January 2014 diff hist +958 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Relevant comment unworthy of collapsing: Reply to Resolute
24 January 2014
- 22:1522:15, 24 January 2014 diff hist +419 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Privacy and Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians: My 2 cents
- 22:1022:10, 24 January 2014 diff hist +2,512 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Still nothing about dealing with admin abuse: Reply
- 21:2821:28, 24 January 2014 diff hist +889 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Still nothing about dealing with admin abuse: Reply to AGK
- 21:2121:21, 24 January 2014 diff hist +1,743 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Relevant comment unworthy of collapsing: Reply to Resolute
- 18:3718:37, 24 January 2014 diff hist +143 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Relevant comment unworthy of collapsing: Also
- 18:3418:34, 24 January 2014 diff hist +1,176 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Relevant comment unworthy of collapsing: Reply
- 17:4417:44, 24 January 2014 diff hist +247 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Still nothing about dealing with admin abuse: Well at least we can agree on that much
- 15:5415:54, 24 January 2014 diff hist +576 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Still nothing about dealing with admin abuse: Reply to Salvio
- 15:5015:50, 24 January 2014 diff hist +979 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Relevant comment unworthy of collapsing: Reply to Resolute
- 14:2914:29, 24 January 2014 diff hist +864 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Relevant comment unworthy of collapsing: Reply