User contributions for K

16 February 2021

• 23:4923:49, 16 February 2021 diff hist +169 Microplastics Providing two citations for the general range of half-life degradation of common plastics

12 February 2021

• 15:5015:50, 12 February 2021 diff hist +30 Nathaniel Gordon →Trial: Just making clearer that February 7 was the originally scheduled execution date, not the date of sentencing nor of the actual execution

7 February 2021

• 18:1418:14, 7 February 2021 diff hist +174 m Nathaniel Gordon →Trial: Adding a ref that includes more of the quote of Judge Shipman
• 17:4117:41, 7 February 2021 diff hist +268 Nathaniel Gordon →Trial: Adding a short paragraph to Judge Shipman's statement
• 17:3917:39, 7 February 2021 diff hist −11 m Nathaniel Gordon Removing excess dashes not in the original

19 October 2016

• 15:5115:51, 19 October 2016 diff hist −286 Marshall, Liberia Removed irrelevant ref about Marshall Islands not Marshall, Liberia Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

11 January 2015

• 01:0001:00, 11 January 2015 diff hist +4 Adansonia wikify Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

20 December 2014

• 17:0517:05, 20 December 2014 diff hist −280 Truth Removing an only remotely relevant brief paragraph from the lead per WP:LEAD. Not discussed in the article.

9 May 2014

• 01:2901:29, 9 May 2014 diff hist +390 User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Sfan00 IMG/Archive 19 →File:Village Scene 1906- pg 174 - India under royal eyes- Henry Francis Prevost Battersby.jpg

14 February 2013

• 03:0703:07, 14 February 2013 diff hist +4 m Pseudoscience →History: wikilink alchemy, first use in section
• 02:5002:50, 14 February 2013 diff hist +1 m Intelligent design →Film: comma for clarity of phrasing

18 April 2012

• 02:4502:45, 18 April 2012 diff hist +8 Intelligent design In the lead third paragraph, the point is that they advocated inclusion in SCIENCE curricula, not religion or philosophy-- specifically biology curricula

10 December 2011

• 16:3416:34, 10 December 2011 diff hist 0 Erta Ale four, not five, according to Guy de Saint Cyr in the cited source

8 June 2011

• 12:2712:27, 8 June 2011 diff hist −54 Intelligent design →Creating and teaching the controversy: No need for this phrase in this place in the article. Seems it was added since the last FA review. The challenge to it on Talk is reasonable as it's not in the source and is said elsewhere in article

6 June 2011

• 16:2516:25, 6 June 2011 diff hist +8 N User:K/EditCounterOptIn.js Optin.js current

18 May 2011

• 18:3718:37, 18 May 2011 diff hist +55 Intelligent design →Origin of the concept: providing link to .pdf of cited article, currently fn22
• 02:2202:22, 18 May 2011 diff hist +14 m Talk:Intelligent design →Proposals to improve article: pardon my syntax

17 May 2011

• 21:2321:23, 17 May 2011 diff hist −2 m Talk:Intelligent design →Proposals to improve article: fmt
• 21:2121:21, 17 May 2011 diff hist +911 Talk:Intelligent design →Proposals to improve article: suggest looking at some prior versions of the second paragraph

16 May 2011

• 02:4902:49, 16 May 2011 diff hist +14 m Talk:Intelligent design →In progress: fmt italics
• 02:4602:46, 16 May 2011 diff hist +101 Talk:Intelligent design →In progress: clarifying a bit and noting which of Augustine's and Cicero's works were the basis for the earlier "origins of the concept" section in context of the recent, more concise section

15 May 2011

• 23:0223:02, 15 May 2011 diff hist +6 m Talk:Intelligent design →In progress: fmt italics
• 23:0123:01, 15 May 2011 diff hist +1,809 Talk:Intelligent design →In progress: rsp to Dave Souza
• 22:1722:17, 15 May 2011 diff hist +33 m Talk:Intelligent design →In progress: signing, thanks for covering the signature Dave Souza
• 19:4919:49, 15 May 2011 diff hist +97 Talk:Intelligent design →Origin of the concept trimmed: copyedit
• 19:4719:47, 15 May 2011 diff hist +14 m Talk:Intelligent design →Origin of the concept trimmed: fixed links
• 19:4319:43, 15 May 2011 diff hist +2,375 Talk:Intelligent design →Origin of the concept trimmed

14 May 2011

• 15:1715:17, 14 May 2011 diff hist −7 Intelligent design →Origin of the concept: removing a redundant adjective, and, changing two instances to lower case on "intelligent design". Where did the citations go? This streamlined version will need some [[V's

11 May 2011

• 04:4704:47, 11 May 2011 diff hist −2 m Talk:Intelligent design →Seamless integration of Enlightenment and Christianity: minor tweak
• 04:4604:46, 11 May 2011 diff hist +67 m Talk:Intelligent design →Seamless integration of Enlightenment and Christianity: and also... the bit about seamless integration of "Enlightenment" and "Christianity"
• 04:4204:42, 11 May 2011 diff hist +191 Talk:Intelligent design →Seamless integration of Enlightenment and Christianity: Copyediting comments. Pardon me--rendering Howe's statement a bit more accurately. Even I was misled by the proposed sentence which said "most Americans"
• 04:3404:34, 11 May 2011 diff hist −1 m Talk:Intelligent design →Seamless integration of Enlightenment and Christianity: gmmr, tweak
• 04:2804:28, 11 May 2011 diff hist +1 m Talk:Intelligent design →Seamless integration of Enlightenment and Christianity: fmt/indent
• 04:2704:27, 11 May 2011 diff hist +1,346 Talk:Intelligent design →Seamless integration of Enlightenment and Christianity: more on my reasoning for the last edit

10 May 2011

• 08:5808:58, 10 May 2011 diff hist −338 Intelligent design →Origin of the concept: Rmvg newly placed sentence about how folks in 19th Century " ... integrated their Enlightenment with their Christianity ... ". Not suitable for WP:Summary style,

14 April 2011

• 03:1503:15, 14 April 2011 diff hist −2 Teleological argument →The British empiricists: following up last edit with minor revision of syntax. Berkeley's empiricism was radical, but not at all the same as William James's radical empiricism
• 03:0303:03, 14 April 2011 diff hist −12 Teleological argument →The British empiricists: removing "mentioned below" (which it hasn't been in this article for quite some time) and adding wikilink directly to radical empiricism

12 April 2011

• 03:4703:47, 12 April 2011 diff hist +10 m Talk:Intelligent design →Misinformation: minor cleanup
• 03:4003:40, 12 April 2011 diff hist 0 m Talk:Intelligent design →Misinformation: fmt/indent
• 03:3903:39, 12 April 2011 diff hist +855 Talk:Intelligent design →Misinformation: please read the references in the notes--Kitzmiller decision is definitely RS

9 April 2011

• 17:2817:28, 9 April 2011 diff hist +1,286 Talk:Intelligent design →Proposed deletions from the introduction: my $0.02

19 February 2011

• 01:1701:17, 19 February 2011 diff hist 0 m Talk:Intelligent design →To boldly went...: typo

18 February 2011

• 21:1121:11, 18 February 2011 diff hist −1 m Talk:Intelligent design →To boldly went...: tweaks
• 21:0921:09, 18 February 2011 diff hist +824 Talk:Intelligent design →To boldly went...

27 January 2011

• 21:1421:14, 27 January 2011 diff hist −229 Intelligent design →Creating and teaching the controversy: Removing one sentence of WP:SYN, which was stated as a conclusory thesis in WP's voice, from fourth paragraph of section.

12 January 2011

• 20:3120:31, 12 January 2011 diff hist +9 m Southern Poverty Law Center →Finances: making a bit clearer that this is Silverstein's assertion--it's not at all clear how he arrived at this calculation, seemingly different from Charity Navigator's numbers
• 15:4415:44, 12 January 2011 diff hist +1,081 Talk:Southern Poverty Law Center →Improper use of sources: agreed, and ...
• 02:2602:26, 12 January 2011 diff hist +6 m Talk:Southern Poverty Law Center →Improper use of sources: break
• 01:3701:37, 12 January 2011 diff hist +1,790 Talk:Southern Poverty Law Center →Improper use of sources: inflation and some thoughts
• 01:0701:07, 12 January 2011 diff hist −5 m Southern Poverty Law Center self-rvv. The syntax of the lead, arrived at by committee of contentious talk-page activity, was perhaps best left as it was for the past couple weeks.