User contributions for 2.102.187.12

16 September 2013

• 02:3102:31, 16 September 2013 diff hist +2 Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language →Need some help from a wordsmith
• 02:3102:31, 16 September 2013 diff hist +538 Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language →Need some help from a wordsmith: offline for a bit now
• 02:1202:12, 16 September 2013 diff hist +551 Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language →Need some help from a wordsmith
• 01:4601:46, 16 September 2013 diff hist +307 Talk:Femininity →Discussion
• 01:4301:43, 16 September 2013 diff hist +618 Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language →Need some help from a wordsmith: new section
• 01:1701:17, 16 September 2013 diff hist −67 FWD.us →Keystone XL oil pipeline support
• 01:0801:08, 16 September 2013 diff hist −40 Daily Worker →1930s Tag: section blanking
• 00:5600:56, 16 September 2013 diff hist +357 Talk:Femininity →Discussion
• 00:4700:47, 16 September 2013 diff hist +1 Adrian Lamo No edit summary
• 00:4200:42, 16 September 2013 diff hist −35 Template:WikiLeaks can't have both names here indefinitely

15 September 2013

• 23:1423:14, 15 September 2013 diff hist +575 Talk:Femininity →Discussion
• 22:1222:12, 15 September 2013 diff hist +413 Talk:Femininity →Discussion
• 21:5221:52, 15 September 2013 diff hist +801 Talk:Femininity →Discussion
• 20:4720:47, 15 September 2013 diff hist +524 Talk:Femininity →Discussion
• 19:5419:54, 15 September 2013 diff hist −505 User talk:2.102.187.12 Undid revision 573054359 by Ronz (talk) you keep adding the wrong templates
• 19:5319:53, 15 September 2013 diff hist +478 Talk:Femininity →Discussion
• 19:2419:24, 15 September 2013 diff hist +270 Talk:Femininity →Discussion
• 17:5417:54, 15 September 2013 diff hist −67 Cross-dressing unsourced and misleading/ambiguous
• 17:4117:41, 15 September 2013 diff hist +869 Talk:Femininity →Discussion
• 17:2417:24, 15 September 2013 diff hist −695 User talk:2.102.187.12 Undid revision 573039297 by Ronz (talk)
• 17:2317:23, 15 September 2013 diff hist −432 Femininity Undid revision 573039097 by Ronz (talk) actually, it's because it contradicts our other sources and article on stereotypes, as I explained in my edit summary
• 14:2814:28, 15 September 2013 diff hist −16 Effeminacy →Social acceptance and intolerance
• 14:2614:26, 15 September 2013 diff hist −704 Percentages agreement →The document: unsourced
• 11:0811:08, 15 September 2013 diff hist +485 Talk:Femininity →Discussion

14 September 2013

• 22:4022:40, 14 September 2013 diff hist −6 Holding hands No edit summary
• 22:3622:36, 14 September 2013 diff hist −432 Femininity I don't like this blanket statement, as according to our article on stereotypes, stereotypes simply may or may not be accurate and when specifically mentioning gender stereotypes, it says that these are usually much more accurate than other types
• 22:3322:33, 14 September 2013 diff hist +580 Talk:Femininity →Discussion
• 21:3921:39, 14 September 2013 diff hist +1 Talk:Femininity →RfC: Is the word "stereotype" compliant with NPOV in the context of femininity? Is it well-supported by reliable sources?
• 21:3621:36, 14 September 2013 diff hist +10 Talk:Femininity →Discussion
• 21:3521:35, 14 September 2013 diff hist +1,119 Talk:Femininity →Discussion
• 21:0821:08, 14 September 2013 diff hist −115 Talk:Femininity →Discussion
• 21:0621:06, 14 September 2013 diff hist +552 Talk:Femininity →Discussion
• 20:1920:19, 14 September 2013 diff hist −6,199 User talk:2.102.187.12 ←Blanked the page
• 20:1720:17, 14 September 2013 diff hist +298 Talk:Femininity →Discussion
• 20:1320:13, 14 September 2013 diff hist +58 Talk:Femininity →RfC: Is the word "stereotype" compliant with NPOV in the context of femininity? Is it well-supported by reliable sources?
• 20:1220:12, 14 September 2013 diff hist +661 Talk:Femininity →RfC: Is the word "stereotype" compliant with NPOV in the context of femininity? Is it well-supported by reliable sources?

12 September 2013

• 17:1417:14, 12 September 2013 diff hist −119 Femininity you've failed to respond on the talk page so yeah... I won't accept your revert; somebody else has to for me to leave it. btw, shouting the "BRD" essay won't prevent you being blocked for edit warring
• 17:1117:11, 12 September 2013 diff hist +132 Talk:United States Armed Forces →Male – Female vs. Female – Male sequencing (BRD)
• 17:0817:08, 12 September 2013 diff hist +7 Operation Downfall →Planning

11 September 2013

• 17:0117:01, 11 September 2013 diff hist +585 User talk:2.102.187.12 No edit summary
• 16:5316:53, 11 September 2013 diff hist +203 User talk:RobertEves92 →Replied on my talk: new section
• 16:5016:50, 11 September 2013 diff hist +207 User talk:2.102.187.12 →September 2013
• 16:4416:44, 11 September 2013 diff hist −16 Effeminacy Undid revision 572503883 by Kirachinmoku (talk) ?????????
• 14:5514:55, 11 September 2013 diff hist −16 Effeminacy Undid revision 572490896 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) "stereotype" is a negative word and isn't even required in the first place, thus failing NPOV
• 14:5414:54, 11 September 2013 diff hist +236 User talk:Mark Arsten →Femininity
• 14:1514:15, 11 September 2013 diff hist −290 Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis looked on eBay, not even close to $100
• 14:0714:07, 11 September 2013 diff hist +348 Talk:Femininity →Article protected
• 14:0514:05, 11 September 2013 diff hist +193 User talk:Mark Arsten →Femininity
• 14:0514:05, 11 September 2013 diff hist −119 Femininity Undid revision 572484253 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) then it should be no problem getting one of them to revert me if they still disagree after my response on the talk page
• 13:2313:23, 11 September 2013 diff hist −119 Femininity we'll see if I have or not depending on whether somebody else will revert, as you seem to be just out to edit war and revert me