User contributions for 172.56.6.142

22 December 2016

• 20:3920:39, 22 December 2016 diff hist 0 Cleaner (2007 film) Fixed typo Tags: canned edit summary Mobile edit Mobile app edit

3 October 2016

• 07:5907:59, 3 October 2016 diff hist +13 808 Mafia No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 07:5807:58, 3 October 2016 diff hist +14 808 Mafia No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

28 August 2016

• 22:1522:15, 28 August 2016 diff hist +15 Windows Media Player →Disc burning, ripping, and playback Tag: extraneous markup

23 February 2015

• 15:5215:52, 23 February 2015 diff hist +986 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →I got blocked for starting a SPI: Jobrot clearly is not legite based on their clear deception and jumping in a very heated discussion on their first edit while claiming to be a noob and then using all kinds of wiki tech terms on their first day edit
• 15:3215:32, 23 February 2015 diff hist +1,694 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →I got blocked for starting a SPI: I edit analyzed every editor involved in the AFD review because of comments made about new accounts, etc. Only one showed a remarkable similarity to Jobrot and that is User:RGloucester.
• 14:3714:37, 23 February 2015 diff hist +324 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →I got blocked for starting a SPI: No confusion. The action I am seeking is 1. Look at the reason I was blocked, it is clearly for initiating a SPI. 2. look at the SPI I initiated which was well laid out and then quickly closed and salted
• 14:1714:17, 23 February 2015 diff hist +1,094 User talk:Liz Something is rotten in Denmark and I am going to point it out. Meat and sock puppets involved in a heated article deletion discussion are very troubling especially when they appear to be done by the editor who nominated the article for deletion.
• 14:0314:03, 23 February 2015 diff hist +12 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →I got blocked for starting a SPI: A fine example of wiki lawyering. I self reported and stated my reason for block evading because I was falsely accused and blocked for properly initiating an SPI
• 14:0214:02, 23 February 2015 diff hist +446 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →I got blocked for starting a SPI
• 11:3111:31, 23 February 2015 diff hist +20 User talk:Jimbo Wales →I got blocked for starting a SPI: Thanks for your time
• 11:0511:05, 23 February 2015 diff hist +2 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →I got blocked for starting a SPI: punctuation
• 11:0511:05, 23 February 2015 diff hist +2 User talk:Samwalton9 →Block evader who got blocked for starting an SPI: punctuation
• 11:0311:03, 23 February 2015 diff hist +894 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →I got blocked for starting a SPI: I noticed my notice of an SPI to other editors involved in a lengthy and heated deletion discussion (names I got from the deletion record) were deleted by [[User:Chillum]
• 11:0211:02, 23 February 2015 diff hist +946 User talk:Samwalton9 →Block evader who got blocked for starting an SPI: new section
• 10:5010:50, 23 February 2015 diff hist +2,521 User talk:Jimbo Wales →I am evading a block but not a sock for which I was blocked Self Reported to ANI: new section
• 10:4310:43, 23 February 2015 diff hist +2,513 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →I am evading a block but not a sock for which I was blocked Self Reported: new section
• 10:2510:25, 23 February 2015 diff hist −1 Free Presbyterian Church Synod of the United States Minor edit spacing
• 10:2210:22, 23 February 2015 diff hist +40 User talk:Ched →I got blocked for starting a SPI: Minor correction
• 10:1710:17, 23 February 2015 diff hist +2,462 User talk:Ched →Thanks for using your brain: look into the salted SPI about RGloucester and check out the case I made. It demonstrates meat puppetry at the best and a sock puppetry in the worst.
• 09:4909:49, 23 February 2015 diff hist +357 User talk:Ched →Thanks for using your brain: new section
• 09:4609:46, 23 February 2015 diff hist +2 User talk:HighInBC →Blocked for sock puppetry: minor
• 09:4209:42, 23 February 2015 diff hist +641 User talk:HighInBC :There is no way User:Jobrot is not a sock or meat puppet and likely User:RGloucester's sock. The evidence is overwhelming and it is what you can expect from an avowed marxist as marxists are nothing more than sophisticated thieves
• 09:2909:29, 23 February 2015 diff hist +707 User talk:HighInBC And I am hiding nothing just standing up to foolish behavior and of course demonstrating the freedom of editing which is quite constrained when one registers. Well Bye Bye, Sir I said Bye Bye!!!
• 09:0909:09, 23 February 2015 diff hist +238 User talk:HighInBC Keep deleting and I will keep reposting. It only takes 5 minutes to get a new IP so maybe you should reconsider that range block or just leave it up so the community knows. I am betting you will range block and yes that is a taunt
• 09:0609:06, 23 February 2015 diff hist +3,783 User talk:Mike V →Revert: Sorry I have to call out unsophisticated foolish behavior but you did it to yourself Chillum. And again no one impersonated you, they just reposted you elsewhere to highlight your paranoid behavior
• 09:0209:02, 23 February 2015 diff hist +107 User talk:172.56.15.36 →Blocked for sock puppetry: Sorry I have to call out unsophisticated foolish behavior but you did it to yourself Chillum. And again no one impersonated you, they just reposted you elsewhere to highlight your paranoid behavior
• 09:0109:01, 23 February 2015 diff hist +932 User talk:HighInBC →Blocked for sock puppetry: Sorry I have to call out unsophisticated foolish behavior but you did it to yourself Chillum. And again no one impersonated you, they just reposted you elsewhere to highlight your paranoid behavior
• 08:5408:54, 23 February 2015 diff hist +3,016 User talk:Andrew Davidson/Pending →An Sock puppet investigation concerning Cultural Marxism Deletion
• 08:5308:53, 23 February 2015 diff hist +3,016 User talk:John Carter →Revert
• 08:5108:51, 23 February 2015 diff hist +1,945 User talk:WeldNeck →An Sock puppet investigation concerning Cultural Marxism Deletion
• 08:4908:49, 23 February 2015 diff hist +5 User talk:172.56.15.36 →Blocked for sock puppetry: Sorry I have to call out unsophisticated foolish behavior but you did it to yourself Chillum. And again no one impersonated you, they just reposted you elsewhere to highlight your paranoid behavior
• 08:4808:48, 23 February 2015 diff hist +617 User talk:172.56.15.36 →Blocked for sock puppetry: Outsmarting a paranoid schizophrenic is quite easy and if you link my edits to other edits with a similar IP you will see I have been editing for years so your paranoid behavior is just that
• 08:2908:29, 23 February 2015 diff hist +1 Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard →Request to other Editors to join this discussion about posting an External link to relevant sites: Rearranged my post to be more clear
• 08:2608:26, 23 February 2015 diff hist +354 Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard →Request to other Editors to join this discussion about posting an External link to relevant sites: Icemanwcs was involved at the Spam blacklist here for the hundreds of times he has linked spamme
• 07:5307:53, 23 February 2015 diff hist 0 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam →Lisa Craig Gautier full of Spam Links to organizations created by a SPA User Talk:Energizerbetty: corrected minor mistake
• 07:5107:51, 23 February 2015 diff hist +1,616 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam →Lisa Craig Gautier full of Spam Links to organizations created by a SPA User Talk:Energizerbetty: new section
• 06:0406:04, 23 February 2015 diff hist +4,175 User talk:Energizerbetty →Lisa Craig Gautier article is full of Link Spam WP:SPAM that is owned by Lisa Gautier Blatant advertising: new section