Edit filter log

'{{archive box| [[User talk:Bus stop/Archive1|1 (June '07-July '07)]] [[User talk:Bus stop/Archive2|2 (July '07-Nov '08)]] [[User_talk:Bus_stop/Archive3| 3 (Nov '08-July '11)]] [[User_talk:Bus_stop/Archive4| 4 (July '11-May '17)]] [[User talk:Bus stop/Archive5| 5 (May '17-Sept '18)]]}} Please don't mess up my recently archived Talk page by posting anything that fails to meet my standards, which will be explained at a later time. == Your contributions == Bus stop, you and I have never really interacted but we've contributed to some of the same articles and talk page discussions. I just wanted to let you know that I hope you will not allow certain editors to bring you down, especially those who launch rude and unprovoked personal insults at you. I may not always agree with your positions, but you have shown yourself to be a very well-intentioned and friendly editor who cares a lot about improving articles. When someone disagrees with you, you show a great interest in understanding their arguments, effectively communicating with good, relevant questions in a very patient manner. Also, you have an excellent ability to remain civil in the face of incivility. I think you're a valuable contributor to this project, and I therefore hope you will always keep that in mind whenever you're dealing with strong opposition. You obviously care a lot about improving articles and the integrity of this project. We need more editors like you. So stay strong. [[Special:Contributions/2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43|2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43]] ([[User talk:2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43|talk]]) 16:00, 10 November 2018 (UTC) :Thank you. I appreciate the encouragement. I was thinking of posting on your Talk page. I wanted to encourage you to create an [[WP:ACCOUNT]]. I can understand not wanting to lose edit history. But maybe you could incorporate a few of the present characters into a user name and announce (repeatedly?) your previous identity? The string of characters is an eyesore. But the choice is yours. Thanks again for the compliments. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 16:18, 10 November 2018 (UTC) ::You're very welcome. I appreciate your input about creating an account. For now, you can just call me Eyesore and I'll know who you're talking to. :) [[Special:Contributions/2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43|2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43]] ([[User talk:2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43|talk]]) 16:31, 10 November 2018 (UTC) :It's not hard to figure out that I'm one of the "certain editors", and I think I'll respond to the criticism.<br />I'll cop to being very direct and pointed on the rare occasion when I feel the need to offer criticism, and I understand that's annoying to some. I work on it constantly and I'm proud of{{emdash}}and surprised at{{emdash}}the progress I've made on it during my Wikipedia tenure. One of the reasons I stick around, when there are good reasons to quit, is that Wikipedia is a great place to work on improving things like patience. To the extent I'm not yet the person I'd like to be, I apologize. But I do not {{tq|launch rude and unprovoked personal insults}} at anybody, by Wikipedia standards. Anybody who feels that I do is entitled to their opinion (and it's telling that they choose not to test their viewpoint at [[WP:ANI]]{{emdash}}rude and unprovoked personal insults would be a clear and sanctionable violation of [[WP:NPA]]).<br />One thing I'm still learning is how to stop responding to endless debate that won't affect the outcome. I just keep getting sucked back in. I'm trying again.<br />Bus stop, I know your heart is in the right place and your only interest is in improving the encyclopedia according to your views about what would be improvement. I have never doubted that for a second. I hope you know that about me. Cheers,&#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 19:36, 11 November 2018 (UTC) ::Thanks, Mandruss. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 20:50, 11 November 2018 (UTC) ==Fred== I think I was being fair enough. He is putting "himself" up for election, on a ticket of ridding the project of those he sees as bothersome. Note also that he is living in the distant past, and I think he means Giano, Eric (both effectively long gone) and now me :) [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 23:59, 10 November 2018 (UTC) :My motivation for weighing in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Candidates/Fred_Bauder/Questions&diff=prev&oldid=868245003 here] is to restore normalcy. I don't [[wiktionary:have a dog in this fight|have a dog in this fight]]. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 00:08, 11 November 2018 (UTC) ::Dont understand that thinking but ok. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 00:12, 11 November 2018 (UTC) :::I don't know much about the origins of the animosity that erupted at the bottom of [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates/Fred Bauder/Questions|this]] page. Nor am I that inclined to get up to speed on the matter. I know what WP:CIVIL is and I know that its exact meaning can be debated. It occurred to me to ask the candidate if they perceived any areas that are technically violations of WP:CIVIL but which can be considered acceptable. The three questions I formulated are designed to accomplish that purpose. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 00:30, 11 November 2018 (UTC) :It seems to me that you are innocently walking into this and taking everybody at face value, and to hell with the past, I'm judging on the here and now only. It didnt start "at the bottom of the page", read the rest of the page, but if you dont get it then that's your luxury. I dont really give a shit what you think, but you voiced against me at AN/I, and here is my perspective. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 00:43, 11 November 2018 (UTC) ::Ceoil—one either uses [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Candidates/Fred_Bauder/Questions#Question_from_Ceoil a forum] in a valid way or not. You called someone ''"a caste conscious warrior",'' you told them that they ''"come across as a surly, dismissive and cranky, monosyllabic CIV warrior"'' and you asked them ''"[w]hy the hell should we elect you again"?'' Is that a legitimate use of a candidate screening process? Finally, [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Fred Bauder|the thread]] at AN/I was initiated [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=868201591 by you.] [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 01:55, 11 November 2018 (UTC) ::<small>(Sorry for jumping in, Bus, but I just wanted to say something.)</small> Ceoil, if you "dont really give a shit" what Bus thinks, then why did you come here and start this thread? And then respond to Bus twice? It sounds like what you're really saying is that you only give a shit about someone's opinion ''if'' they take your side. Just saying. [[Special:Contributions/2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43|2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43]] ([[User talk:2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43|talk]]) 12:17, 11 November 2018 (UTC) :::No, it was an obtuse way of expressing that i only give a shit if the person giving the opinion is somebody I respect, as in this case. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 00:18, 17 November 2018 (UTC) :::{{tq|"[W]hy did you come here and start this thread?"}} I think their purpose is to lodge a complaint. Do I feel bad? Yes. It is an unfortunate encounter. I have enjoyed seeing {{u|Ceoil}} around, occasionally interacting, and they always have amazingly good images on their Talk and User pages. But I would have felt creepy about myself if I turned a blind eye to the ongoing skirmish at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates/Fred Bauder/Questions]] and then [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]]. I regret the whole thing but I think it was unavoidable. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 13:20, 11 November 2018 (UTC) :::::Point taken Bus stop. I would'nt have posted here but I have respected you for years. Given your reply above, then now I understand. There is a lot of history behind what happened, but none of it to do with you. Would be pleased if you were to let this be a bygone and accept my apology for posting here after the fact. I was upset, but misdirected. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 00:14, 17 November 2018 (UTC) ::::::Definitely not a problem, {{u|Ceoil}}, and thank you for that expressed sentiment. Wikipedia can be a particle [[collider]] in which human beings are the particles. Collaborative editing is just a euphemism. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 00:34, 17 November 2018 (UTC) :::::::Well, art history seems to be an area that is one of the few exceptions, well except for modern periods were image use becomes a problem, sigh. I get a kick (and learn a lot) from the fact that we have some very knowledgeable and rational subject experts knocking about, incl yourself. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 00:44, 17 November 2018 (UTC) ::::::::I don't know nothing. But that doesn't stop me from pontificating. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 00:51, 17 November 2018 (UTC) :::::::::My impression is that you know quite a bit, but will respect your modesty and not tell anybody. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 03:39, 17 November 2018 (UTC) ::::Your efforts are very admirable. Just a random thought: editing Wikipedia has to be one of the worst hobbies anyone can have if their health is negatively affected by stress. [[Special:Contributions/2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43|2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43]] ([[User talk:2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43|talk]]) 14:57, 11 November 2018 (UTC) :::::I [[wikt:sleep like a baby|sleep like a baby]]. Nothing upsets me. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 15:22, 11 November 2018 (UTC) ::::::Maybe that's why you're a very good editor. [[Special:Contributions/2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43|2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43]] ([[User talk:2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43|talk]]) 16:49, 11 November 2018 (UTC) :::::::You "have" to be to keep sane in this place. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 00:15, 17 November 2018 (UTC) == More input needed == Yesterday (Saturday), I [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:WWGB#Thousand_Oaks_shooting asked the editor] who started the consensus discussion on the Thousand Oaks shooting talk page if they would please publicize it since the "vote" is about 50/50. They did not reply to me. Today (Sunday), the editor posted [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thousand_Oaks_shooting&diff=868321592&oldid=868318612 this "Progress" comment] in the discussion, but I don't see any mention of the discussion being publicized anywhere. I'll be gone until late tonight or tomorrow, but I wanted to let you know about it. It's a very important discussion, so I think inviting comments would be a good idea so we can try to get consensus one way or the other. [[Special:Contributions/2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43|2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43]] ([[User talk:2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43|talk]]) 19:20, 11 November 2018 (UTC) == Thousand Oaks == Re: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thousand_Oaks_shooting&diff=868376911&oldid=868364490] Ok, I'm not going to participate in adding more clutter on that page, but I can't ignore comments like this. So let's do it here instead. {{tq|Are there any reasons that we should omit the victims' names and ages?}} Facepalm! Yes there are, and that's what we have been putting on that page for a couple of days now. You don't accept our reasons. You are not convinced. We get it. We are not convinced by your reasons, either. That's not at all unusual in Wikipedia discussions, in fact it's routine. You still don't get [[WP:SATISFY]]. ''There is rarely one "correct" answer on a Wikipedia content issue. Almost always, there are only differing viewpoints. Editors state their viewpoints, and their viewpoints prevail or they don't. The world is not black-and-white but rather continuous shades of gray. So is Wikipedia editing.'' I know you're not trolling us, but your comments there are becoming indistinguishable from trolling. I am honestly flabbergasted that a editor with your intelligence and experience is unable to grasp this simple concept. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 20:58, 11 November 2018 (UTC) :You are linking to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thousand_Oaks_shooting&diff=868376911&oldid=868364490 this] but you are not linking to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thousand_Oaks_shooting&diff=prev&oldid=868378917 this]. I removed the edit. I reverted myself. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 21:14, 11 November 2018 (UTC) ::Thank you. Now perhaps we can agree to disagree. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 21:17, 11 November 2018 (UTC) == Talk:USS Fitzgerald and MV ACX Crystal collision == Look, that whole page has gone way of the rails. Dennis and I, and some others, have agreed to stop posting, to allow the page to calm down and consensus to form. I read your last post to me, but there is nothing new there. You are sticking to you opinion, and asking me to clarify and/verify mine. Read through ''all'' my comments, along with all the other opposer's comments, the answers you seek should be there. You can support this in the end as that is your right. But where does it end? Do we list every single person killed in 9/11? Or at Pearl Harbor? What about all ≈58,000+ US military killed in Vietnam? How many is ok and how many is to many? I'll leave you with those thoughts. But for now at least, I'm done posting there. - [[User:Thewolfchild|<span style="color: black">wolf</span>]] 07:37, 17 November 2018 (UTC) == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == {{Ivmbox|Hello, Bus stop. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=866997930 --> == You've got mail == {{You've got mail|dashlesssig=[[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:37, 24 November 2018 (UTC)}} :Hi {{u|Yoninah}}—I see you've taken care of it. Thanks. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 13:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC) ::But I still have a question about canvassing. Does it apply to that page? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 13:51, 25 November 2018 (UTC) :::Honestly I do not know but I think editors commonly communicate with other editors. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 14:25, 25 November 2018 (UTC) == Note == {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' You have recently shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[WP:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect: any administrator may impose [[WP:AC/DS#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or any [[WP:AC/DS#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the [[WP:AC/DS#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[WP:ArbCom|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> <span style="background-color:#cee">[[User:Wumbolo|<span style="color:#066;font-family:Symbol">w</span><span style="color:#066;font-family:Segoe Script">umbolo</span>]]</span> [[User talk:Wumbolo|<span style="color:#37C;font-family:webdings">^^^</span>]] 15:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC) == A trout, for that fishing expedition == {{Trout}} This is for the [[WP:NOTGETTINGIT|I'm-not-listening]] act at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&oldid=873411416#Oppose this] thread (in response to Eli355's !vote), in which you [[WP:BADGER|badgered]] a respondent while accusing them of badgering, refused to [[WP:DROPTHESTICK|drop the stick]] after multiple editors asked you to, and were offering an interpretation for which you had no evidence and which turned out to be completely wrong. Mandruss was being entirely reasonable in asking Eli355 if that editor's meaning was "All modern-day mass killing articles should list the names of all of the dead". You denied this interpretation was plausible, but this is exactly what Eli355 says they meant. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — [[User:SMcCandlish|'''SMcCandlish''']] [[User talk:SMcCandlish|☏]] [[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|¢]] 😼 </span> 01:36, 13 December 2018 (UTC) Re [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&diff=873504343&oldid=873501590 this], I'm not going to add to the problem you create with repetitive over-commenting in discussions, cluttering them to the point that new arrivals don't take the time to read any existing discussion. This is another example. ''Stop repeatedly demanding that others make a case that convinces you.'' That is not how it works, and it's exceedingly annoying that you still don't get it. You are not required to be convinced. If you continue with that in that discussion or others, at some point it will be worth somebody's time to take you to ANI on a disruptive editing complaint. That of course would be an early step on the path to a community ban. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 23:45, 13 December 2018 (UTC) :I apologize, {{u|Mandruss}}. In my opinion I personalized the discussion. I will strike through my comments to you as they were a little strident and a bit over the top. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 03:05, 15 December 2018 (UTC) ::We have a shortcut about this, as I recall: [[WP:SATISFY]]. :-) <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — [[User:SMcCandlish|'''SMcCandlish''']] [[User talk:SMcCandlish|☏]] [[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|¢]] 😼 </span> 10:46, 20 December 2018 (UTC) :::Yes, we know. I've linked that for Bus stop at least three times in the past several months, in various venues. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 16:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC) == Greetings == {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#000000}}};" |rowspan="2" valign="top" | [[File:The Virgin Mary and Five Standing Saints above Predella Panels Full.jpg|400px]] |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''Seasons Greetings''' |rowspan="2" valign="top" | [[File:MS M.493, fol. 28v edit.jpg|200px]] |- |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wishing you all the best and continued success for 2019 and keep on going. Yes I don't know how to do basic white on black, sorry! [[User talk:Ceoil|<font color="#006633">Ceoil</font>]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) |} :Season's Greetings, {{u|Ceoil}}—Thank you! [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 02:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC) == Strikethrough == Just FYI, the HTML element for that is {{tag|s}}. The {{tag|strike}} one hasn't been valid HTML since the 1990s. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — [[User:SMcCandlish|'''SMcCandlish''']] [[User talk:SMcCandlish|☏]] [[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|¢]] 😼 </span> 10:42, 20 December 2018 (UTC) ==Happy Holidays== {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Pierre-Auguste_Renoir_-_Suzanne_Valadon_-_Dance_at_Bougival.jpg|thumb|160px|]] |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Season's greetings!''' |- |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I hope this holiday season is festive and fulfilling and filled with love and kindness, and that 2019 will be safe, successful and rewarding...keep hope alive....[[User:Modernist|Modernist]] ([[User talk:Modernist|talk]]) 12:48, 24 December 2018 (UTC) |} == Your thread has been archived == {| style="margin: 1em 4em;" |- valign="top" | [[File:WP teahouse logo 2.png|alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0]] | <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;"> Hi '''Bus stop'''! You created a thread called {{tq|Editing dispute, possible next steps}} at [[Wikipedia:Teahouse]], but it has been [[WP:ARCHIVE|archived]] because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion [[Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 887#Editing_dispute,_possible_next_steps|here]]. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Teahouse&action=edit&section=new&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Follow-up to [[Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 887#Editing_dispute,_possible_next_steps|Editing dispute, possible next steps]]}} create a new thread]. <small>Archival by {{noping|Lowercase sigmabot III}}, notification delivery by {{noping|Muninnbot}}, both [[WP:BOT|automated accounts]]. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{tlx|nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. [[User:Muninnbot|Muninnbot]] ([[User talk:Muninnbot|talk]]) 19:01, 11 January 2019 (UTC)</small> <small></small></div> </div> |}<!-- User:Tigraan-testbot/Teahouse_archival_notification --> == Charlie Patton == Thank you for the wonderful song that I had never heard before. Something in return [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCleu__8hkk]. [[User talk:Ceoil|<font color="#006633">Ceoil</font>]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 01:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC) :Thank you {{u|Ceoil}}! [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 02:20, 13 January 2019 (UTC) ::Palace - [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kcn-5I34y0A Come In]. (ps yes love Janice, the Palace song always reminds me of the stones "cant always get what you want") [[User talk:Ceoil|<font color="#006633">Ceoil</font>]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 13:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC) == Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion == [[File:Peacedove.svg|60px|left]] This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard]] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> [[User:Puzzledvegetable|Puzzledvegetable]] ([[User talk:Puzzledvegetable|talk]]) 13:22, 23 January 2019 (UTC) ::::::I just want to clarify one point. I completely agree with you when it comes to your opinions about the IDF. I've been to Israel, I have relatives that either live there or have been studying there for a considerable time, and I wholeheartedly support Israel. It is the only democratic country in a region characterized by dictatorial governments, and that is not lost on me. However, this article is biased towards the IDF. It contains a lot of subjective terms that make the IDF seem perfect. I fear that if the article is like this, people will be inclined not to treat the information as seriously as they otherwise might. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and as such, it needs to be impartial in order to present its information in a meaningful way. [[User:Puzzledvegetable|Puzzledvegetable]] ([[User talk:Puzzledvegetable|talk]]) 16:36, 23 January 2019 (UTC) + edit :::::::Do you think it is the most productive thing to add a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Israel_Defense_Forces&diff=879686715&oldid=879667243 Peacock notice]? If you feel the article "contains a lot of subjective terms that make the IDF seem perfect"—why not just work on those specific problems? No one knows which specific areas you have in mind because the Peacock notice is nonspecific. I think you should consider removing that notice after a limited period of time. I haven't worked on this article to any real extent so I may be unaware of its problems. But I just thought I'd mention that the notice on the top of the article seems to me to be counterproductive. (Just my opinion.) But maybe short-term it announces intention to address a certain sort of problem. There is always room for improvement. (My motto.) [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 16:56, 23 January 2019 (UTC) {{outdent}}I personally don't think any of these notices are productive, because I've never seen any of them do anything, but I also see no harm in having it there. I will try to replace subjective words, but if it gets me the attention that my last attempt did, I just might not have the patience. [[User:Puzzledvegetable|Puzzledvegetable]] ([[User talk:Puzzledvegetable|talk]]) 17:06, 23 January 2019 (UTC) :That is why it's called collaborative editing. Didn't you notice the collaboration? [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 18:07, 23 January 2019 (UTC) == My response to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Stefan_Molyneux=source your last question on Stefan Molynuex's BLP discussion] == Hello [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]], I wrote this out and it took me forever. The point seems moot, but I'd figure I post anyway since you apologized. You asked why I didn't add the sources to the Stefan Molyneux article page, here is my response and an analysis with the hopes of preventing confusion in the future: :[[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] I didn't added those sources to the main article because: :1. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stefan_Molyneux&diff=prev&oldid=881900303=source I didn't provide the sources], that was [[User:MPants at work|MPants at work]] :2. because I hadn't read those sources yet :3. because I was trying to read everything in the [[Talk:Stefan Molyneux/Archive 6#White genocide conspiracy theory|White genocide conspiracy theory section of Stefan Molyneux's talk page]] and this BLP page before commenting ([[Due diligence]]). :Generally speaking it seemed like you had your mind made up before discussing with other editors. You immediately repeated what Jwray said as if it was an obvious fact--both of you stating that "RNZ is the TMZ of New Zealand" which isn't just saying it's politically biased (like if you compared it to [[Air America]]), it's [[WP:Battleground]] behavior. Any knowledge of RNZ or even a passing glance at it's Wikipedia shows it's more like [[National Public Radio]] for NZ. Characterizing a public radio station as at all like TMZ, even if it's not in bad faith, is negligent and breaking [[Wikipedia:Civility#Cooperation and civility|WP:CIVIL]]. :So things got off to a bad start, but then it seemed like you were either not seeing people replying to you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stefan_Molyneux&diff=prev&oldid=881838683=source like here] or were saying things like: :''"The article is presently using the direct quote. (In the past it had been using a paraphrase.) But that only makes the matter worse. We are inserting an internal link into a quote. I think this is sometimes acceptable and sometimes not acceptable. I don't think the nature of the [[White genocide conspiracy theory]] article lends it to insertion within a quote. Such an internal link would be better placed in the See also section."'' :Like you just restated the same opinion you've already said before and still without a source. This is frustrating, especially for a newbie like me. This response took me forever, mostly because I was [[H:LINK|learning how to do things]] and making sure I understood everything around the discussion. So when you said: :"''we would not be at liberty to tar and feather the subject of a biography even if it were not a BLP. I am ignorant of the policy, but I'm sure there is one, that compels us to paraphrase instead of quote a source...''" :Better decisions could be to just go find the policy, ask another editor, or better yet try creating a new or more specific policy. [[WP:NOTFORUM|Wikipedia is not a forum]] so pontificating on policy that may or may not exist is not why we are here. Researching policies and taking initiative to find other sources (instead of complaining about just one). It saves us all time, keeps Wikipedia consistent, you'll learn things (and be able to teach them), and then it won't be he said, she said or "I think..." :TL;DR Spend more time crafting your own response that is well sourced and is up to date with the current discussion. I did not feel that I could give a good response until it was clear that you had missed something that I didn't. Let me know what you think! Or not, totally up to you. :Cheers, :[[User:Pokerplayer513|Pokerplayer513]] ([[User talk:Pokerplayer513|talk]]) 06:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC) == BLP Noticeboard tussle == Just wanted to thank you for sticking up for me the other day. I was reminded when I did something similar and I was hoping the other editor would defend himself against the erroneous charges. But I've found it's a lot easier to stand up for someone else than it is to stand up for yourself in here. And I'm sure you've noticed, it's not very productive when it involves MPants. I think his assertions and my edits speak for themselves so I don't feel the need to entertain his attacks, but I didn't want you to feel like I left you out to dry. I'd like to echo what Eye Sore said. We need more editors like you. --[[Special:Contributions/74.195.159.155|74.195.159.155]] ([[User talk:74.195.159.155|talk]]) 21:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC) :Everybody's got a saving grace. Eyesores are a beautiful thing. It just depends on how you see them. Thank you for your kind words. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 22:27, 25 February 2019 (UTC) == Please comment on [[Talk:Aurora, Illinois shooting#rfc_36DE909|Talk:Aurora, Illinois shooting]] == The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Aurora, Illinois shooting#rfc_36DE909|this request for comment on '''Talk:Aurora, Illinois shooting''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 99054 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC) == Edit warring == Regarding your latest edits at [[Jewish religious clothing]]. Don't you think an experienced editor like you should refrain from edit warring. In general, I mean. It becomes bothersome, no? Especially in this case, where there are two editors who disagree with you. And the discussion s ongoing. Please also take [[WP:BRD]] to heart. [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] ([[User talk:Debresser|talk]]) 20:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC) == Flore (artist) == Please leave out little back and forth at [[Flore (artist)]] collapsed. there's no need to conceptualize wiki space as a battleground. I'm planning on avoiding any interaction with you in future, and suggest you do the same. We obviously disagree often enough on trivial things for it it to be a hindrance to the editing process.[[User:ThatMontrealIP|ThatMontrealIP]] ([[User talk:ThatMontrealIP|talk]]) 22:33, 6 April 2019 (UTC) == Please comment on [[Talk:Jewish religious clothing#rfc_D92A9AF|Talk:Jewish religious clothing]] == The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Jewish religious clothing#rfc_D92A9AF|this request for comment on '''Talk:Jewish religious clothing''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 101033 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:41, 14 April 2019 (UTC) == Talk page comments == Should not be altered after they have been replied to (as you did here [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Notability&diff=894384575&oldid=894384417]]).[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 15:21, 27 April 2019 (UTC) :{{u|Slatersteven}}—that was more along the lines of an edit conflict. I apologize. Why not just remove or alter your edit so that the sequence of comments make sense? [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 15:32, 27 April 2019 (UTC) ::You did not even bother to read the post you were replying to, why therefore should I see any value in continuation of that discussion?[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 15:42, 27 April 2019 (UTC) :::{{tq|"You did not even bother to read the post you were replying to"}}. I ''thought'' I read it. I made a mistake. I ''misread'' it. I apologize. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 16:11, 27 April 2019 (UTC) == Policy violation == As stated in my edit summary, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019_UNCC_shooting&diff=895358546&oldid=895358062 your revert] is in violation of the Wikipedia policy [[WP:ONUS]]: "The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content." This is regardless of how many editors immediately present are unaware of the policy or choose to ignore it. Please self-revert and, if you like, seek consensus for inclusion on the talk page. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 18:19, 3 May 2019 (UTC) A different editor has started the talk page discussion, so all that remains is to remove the disputed content pending a consensus to include it. Since you're an ethical person I trust you'll do that in the spirit of fair play, just as I would respect a consensus to include a list despite disagreeing with it. Thanks. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 23:51, 3 May 2019 (UTC) == good faith editors == Also read others responses, maybe if you had done that here [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Notability&diff=895170150&oldid=895168835]] you might have realized that in fact I has said exactly what you were asking for clarification as (as I do in fact literally say what you think I might not have realized I was saying).[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 09:46, 6 May 2019 (UTC) == Please comment on [[Talk:Lady Louise Windsor#rfc_77AB507|Talk:Lady Louise Windsor]] == The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Lady Louise Windsor#rfc_77AB507|this request for comment on '''Talk:Lady Louise Windsor''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 102860 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:33, 15 May 2019 (UTC) == Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago == {{User QAIbox | title = Awesome | image = Cscr-featured.svg | image_upright = 0.35 | bold = [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/Precious#Dylan620, 2009|Ten years!]] }} --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 05:37, 18 May 2019 (UTC) {{-}} ==Discretionary sanctions for American politics== {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[WP:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[WP:AC/DS#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[WP:AC/DS#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the [[WP:AC/DS#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[WP:ArbCom|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.&nbsp; [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] &#124; [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 15:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC). }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> Hi, Bus stop. I believe your previous DS alert for American politics has expired. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] &#124; [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 15:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC). == Disruption continues at [[Aurora, Illinois shooting]] == You have three experienced editors asking you drop the stick, and no experienced editors who feel this warrants further discussion. That means you drop the stick or face a [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]] complaint. You exhausted my patience in this topic area some time ago and I would strongly support a topic ban in such a complaint. Consider yourself warned. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 14:37, 25 May 2019 (UTC) == [[Virginia Beach shooting‎]] == Just a reminder-- y'all might want to discuss more and revert less.[[User:Dlohcierekim|Dlohcierekim]] ([[User talk:Dlohcierekim|talk]]) 14:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC) :I am not averse to discussion, {{u|Dlohcierekim}}. Is the proximal reason for this [[wikt:heads up|heads up]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Virginia_Beach_shooting&diff=900412262&oldid=900409802 this edit]? [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 14:21, 5 June 2019 (UTC) ::I got an identical "warning" from that admin. Since my revert in that exchange was the completely routine R in [[WP:BRD]], it's more likely they were referring to earlier stuff that is old news at this point. Either that or they don't understand BRD, which seems unlikely. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 14:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC) :::Mandruss—we are not insensitive to the emotional dimensions of the topic of this article. In [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Virginia_Beach_shooting&diff=prev&oldid=900409802 this edit] your concern seems to be with using {{tq|"fewer words"}}. This is a matter of judgement but in my opinion, when referring to the enormity of the crime of murder, the loquaciousness of {{tq|"Prior to the shooting"}} is appropriate. But this is a matter of opinion and judgement. Perhaps you're right. I am just endorsing the previous version by reverting. I hope there is no harm done. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 14:39, 5 June 2019 (UTC) ::::Don't confuse content with process. No, there is no real harm done, it's not a big content issue, but I hope you will bear in mind that reverts and editsums are not substitutes for article talk page (not user talk page) discussion, nor an expedient way of !voting. BRD is a thing, but BRR is not{{emdash}}even when you are not the B editor. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 14:54, 5 June 2019 (UTC) :::::I support keeping the lists, because its journalistic record. Notice how opposition persons characterize the keep side as an "emotional" matter. Clearly emotional arguments are beside the point, its a journalistic argument to keep. -[[User:ApexUnderground|ApexUnderground]] ([[User talk:ApexUnderground|talk]]) 09:01, 14 June 2019 (UTC) == Please comment on [[Talk:Air Force Amy#rfc_A0F7D02|Talk:Air Force Amy]] == The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Air Force Amy#rfc_A0F7D02|this request for comment on '''Talk:Air Force Amy''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 104781 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:34, 15 June 2019 (UTC) == FYI on RFC tactics == I was summoned by bot to the Virginia Beach shooting RFC. Going into the RFC, my initial leaning was towards including the names -- sure, why not? But after reading thru the RFC, I changed my mind, primarily because of your arguments for inclusion. The arguments' weakness, especially of the "everyone else does it" type, made me wonder if there was any ''good'' argument in favor of inclusion. Seeing the same arguments repeated and pushed with strong insistence yet weak evidence undermined any remaining support I had for inclusion. Thus, your arguments had the opposite of your intended effect (unless you are actually ''against'' inclusion and are ''very'' devious, but I AGF). As I stated in the RFC, I don't want the debate tactics, or lack thereof, to be the deciding factor in any RFC. To that end, I felt obliged to inform you of your tactics effect on me in this RFC. If you don't find this helpful, I understand. I just had to satisfy what seemed to me my duty to WP to inform you of this. I've been guilty of the same tactics myself, and have made it a point to change -- still a work in progress. --[[User:A D Monroe III|A&#8239;D&#8239;Monroe&#8239;III]]^{([[User talk:A D Monroe III#top|talk]])} 15:51, 24 June 2019 (UTC) :{{u|A D Monroe III}}—at [[Talk:Virginia Beach shooting#RfC: Should the page include the victims' names?]] I'm asking why an on-topic and reliably-sourced area of information should be omitted. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 16:11, 24 June 2019 (UTC) Also FYI, Jim Michael hasn't read a single story you presented him during your long and arduous conversation. Nor anything about the victims. His assertions of fact are entirely based on hunches. I suggested he come clean to you himself, but he seemed remorseless, if not proud. Everyone else's fault for assuming he studied the subject he seemed so convinced about, or something. I wouldn't waste any more time getting bullshitted, I were you. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] [[User_Talk:InedibleHulk|(talk)]] 12:41, [[June 27]], [[2019]] (UTC) :As long as you're here, I wanted to mention to you that I found an article on the subject you've referenced—the [[Five Ws]]. It is that old standby, the who-what-where-when-why thingy. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 13:13, 27 June 2019 (UTC) ::Spirit of Eagle included that link in his vote, and I already knew I wasn't making it up. But thanks, anyway. It's a good thingy to brush up on. You ever look in [[here]]? Or [[there]]? What about [[now]]? I haven't...yet. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] [[User_Talk:InedibleHulk|(talk)]] 13:52, [[June 27]], [[2019]] (UTC) :::{{tq|"It's a good thingy to brush up on."}} The question is—what sort of [[Brush]]. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 13:56, 27 June 2019 (UTC) ::::Isn't that technically a [[statement]]? [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] [[User_Talk:InedibleHulk|(talk)]] 14:05, [[June 27]], [[2019]] (UTC) :::::I gave considerable thought to whether to question mark the end of the sentence or period the end of the sentence. I finally felt there was a greater degree of appropriateness in the non-question mark formulation. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 14:11, 27 June 2019 (UTC) ::::::There is perhaps no greater feeling on Earth (given the circumstances, I mean). Well played! Certainly trumps the sadness I felt upon visiting my Wikilinks. Just ambiguity all the way down...not recommended. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] [[User_Talk:InedibleHulk|(talk)]] 14:57, [[June 27]], [[2019]] (UTC) == Please comment on [[Talk:Australia#rfc_030431D|Talk:Australia]] == The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Australia#rfc_030431D|this request for comment on '''Talk:Australia''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 106599 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:36, 15 July 2019 (UTC) == [[Wikipedia:Casualty lists]] essay == I've started an essay at {{lw|Casualty lists}} that I would like your input on if possible, or at the least, for you to watchlist it and help me maintain it. I believe we can provide a good rationale there for including names in the victim section of appropriate articles, and perhaps this can be a jumping off point for starting a project-wide conversation on the issue. If you can make any improvements, or have suggestions, don't hesitate to reach out. Thank you! —[[User:Locke Cole|Locke Cole]] • [[User talk:Locke Cole|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Locke Cole|c]] 04:09, 5 August 2019 (UTC) :I have certainly watch-listed it, {{u|Locke Cole}}, and believe it or not I have scratched out a couple of sentences under contemplation for inclusion in such an essay. The thing is the issue is so basic, by which I mean that basic information belongs in an article. It's hard to write an article on brick houses while omitting the word "brick". I mean, you can do it. The articles exist without the names of the victims. But they are conspicuously absent. I think any reader would say "why are the names missing?" I obviously don't buy the argument that they don't "enhance the reader's understanding of the event". There is no one "understanding" of the event. An "understanding" emerges from the compilation of the basic facts. And one can easily look to articles containing victim names and see that feature as entirely constructive to the quality of the article. It looks like I'm writing an essay here. Anyway, thanks for contacting me and obviously I'll keep in mind the document you've initiated. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 08:16, 10 August 2019 (UTC) == My hatting == Please respect my hatting of your comment. I'm sorry that you feel like your argument isn't being treated fairly, but consensus is very clearly against it, something established quite strongly now: this means it is beyond time to drop the [[WP:STICK]]. This is not the first time you've been asked to do this ([[#Disruption continues at Aurora, Illinois shooting]]), and the same thing applies here.--[[User:Jasper Deng|Jasper Deng]] [[User talk:Jasper Deng|(talk)]] 15:41, 6 August 2019 (UTC) :I will take this to AN/I if you again revert my hatting of your comment, which is beginning to stray into disruptive territory since it is now interfering with constructive discussion about "warehouse" (hence the hat instead of just a reply). Why can't you just make some comments about that issue instead of futilely arguing against consensus?--[[User:Jasper Deng|Jasper Deng]] [[User talk:Jasper Deng|(talk)]] 15:55, 6 August 2019 (UTC) :Jasper Deng—no one needs you imposing their will on them...I certainly don't. You are not ''assisting'' me by repeatedly collapsing my input to a discussion. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 15:57, 6 August 2019 (UTC) ::Since you abused rollback, I've opened [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Bus_stop_at_Talk:Oakland_Ghost_Ship_fire]].--[[User:Jasper Deng|Jasper Deng]] [[User talk:Jasper Deng|(talk)]] 15:58, 6 August 2019 (UTC) == Please comment on [[Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#rfc_95EFF5E|Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion]] == The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#rfc_95EFF5E|this request for comment on '''Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 108452 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC) == Rfc on at [[Talk:Stanley Kubrick]] == Hi, I noticed your past participation in a 2017 Rfc regarding adding an infobox to Stanley Kubrick's article. I just wanted to notify you that there is an Rfc currently underway there. I thought you may be interested. This is likely to be the multi-year moratorium on the topic once this survey ends. Thanks! [[User:HAL333|<span style="background:red; color:white; padding:2px;">HAL</span>]][[User talk:HAL333|<span style="background:black; color:white; padding:2px;">333</span>]] 01:46, 19 August 2019 (UTC) == Edit on [[Talk:2019 Dayton shooting]] == Surprised you rolledback your edits as a minor edit. That's not a minor edit from my understanding of them. Accident? [[User:Gwenhope|Gwenhope]] ([[User talk:Gwenhope|talk]]) 00:53, 2 September 2019 (UTC) :{{tps}} - The "minor" flag just prevents edits from cluttering watchlists with things of little importance. I don't think editors need to be made aware of a simple retraction-before-reply. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 01:07, 2 September 2019 (UTC) :: If you say so, Mandy-kun. I guess ''I, as an editor, would prefer'' to be notified about a -830 reversion edit, but you do you. I was just basing off [[WP:ME]] - "Reverting a page is not likely to be considered minor under most circumstances." [[User:Gwenhope|Gwenhope]] ([[User talk:Gwenhope|talk]]) 11:20, 5 September 2019 (UTC) :Yes, just an accident. You make a valid point, {{u|Gwenhope}}. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 01:47, 2 September 2019 (UTC) :{{u|Mandruss}}—page stalking is great, but butting in is not. {{u|Gwenhope}} was not speaking to you. You are of course welcome to post here courteously. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 10:51, 5 September 2019 (UTC) ==September 2019== [[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 21:47, 3 September 2019 (UTC) :[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Formal_proposal_2 Here]. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 21:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC) ::Hey, Bus stop. I think your best chances of not being sanctioned is for you not to post in that thread at all anymore (or as little as possible). Incessant posting will merely prove the point of the proposed sanction. My unsolicited 2 cents of advice. I won't be changing my oppose, but I do understand where the supports are coming from. ---[[User:Sluzzelin|Sluzzelin]] [[User talk:Sluzzelin|<small>talk</small>]] 10:22, 5 September 2019 (UTC) :::Thank you, {{u|Sluzzelin}}, both for the "oppose" vote as well as this post of advice. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 10:47, 5 September 2019 (UTC) :I've closed the thread with a 3-month ban from administrative noticeboards, with some specific exceptions. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=914158009&oldid=914157738] for details. 3 months is short in the long run, and I'm sure both you and the noticeboards will endure it just fine. As some of the people there implied, this isn't about the quality of the positions you take on noticeboards, it's about the [[WP:BLUDGEONING]] and [[WP:IDHT]] behavior. I haven't reviewed your interactions anywhere else on the 'pedia, but from what some were saying in the thread you might want to take this as a warning shot and take some time to examine the way you interact on article talk pages as well. <span style="font-family:times; text-shadow: 0 0 .2em #7af">~[[User:Awilley|Awilley]] <small>([[User talk:Awilley|talk]])</small></span> 14:56, 5 September 2019 (UTC) Bus stop, regarding [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=914157404 this comment], and just to be clear, I think you can be a good contributor to Wikipedia, and I certainly don't want to impose even one block, much less subsequent escalating ones. I don't think anyone else does either; that's not at all the goal. I think people just want the [[WP:BLUDGEON]] behavior to stop. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg]] ^{<small>[[User talk:Jayjg|<span style="color: DarkGreen;">(talk)</span>]]</small>} 16:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC) :AN/I is off my watch-list. And I commit to no more bludgeoning. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 16:19, 5 September 2019 (UTC) ::Thanks. Also, on the Bludgeoning, I totally get how hard it can be to make a valid point, have someone misunderstand/misrepresent/ignore that point, repeat the point again, have it ignored again, and then force yourself to back down and let the other person have the last word. It helps me to remember that no matter how many times I repeat myself I will probably never convince that other person, and that the Bludgeoning is likely to be a turnoff to other people who might otherwise be receptive to my argument. <span style="font-family:times; text-shadow: 0 0 .2em #7af">~[[User:Awilley|Awilley]] <small>([[User talk:Awilley|talk]])</small></span> 20:14, 6 September 2019 (UTC) :::Thanks for following up, {{u|Awilley}}. I will try to be more thoughtful and less impulsive with input I provide to discussions. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 20:51, 6 September 2019 (UTC) == Please comment on [[Talk:Sabine Weyand#rfc_C0D0808|Talk:Sabine Weyand]] == The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Sabine Weyand#rfc_C0D0808|this request for comment on '''Talk:Sabine Weyand''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 110240 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC) == Your thread has been archived == {| style="margin: 1em 4em;" |- valign="top" | [[File:WP teahouse logo 2.png|alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0]] | <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;"> Hi '''Bus stop'''! You created a thread called {{tq|What is the essay ...}} at [[Wikipedia:Teahouse]], but it has been [[WP:ARCHIVE|archived]] because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion [[Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1012#What_is_the_essay_...|here]]. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Teahouse&action=edit&section=new&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Follow-up to [[Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1012#What_is_the_essay_...|What is the essay ...]]}} create a new thread]. <small>Archival by {{noping|Lowercase sigmabot III}}, notification delivery by {{noping|Muninnbot}}, both [[WP:BOT|automated accounts]]. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{tlx|nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. [[User:Muninnbot|Muninnbot]] ([[User talk:Muninnbot|talk]]) 19:02, 14 September 2019 (UTC)</small> <div><small></small></div> </div> |}<!-- User:Tigraan-testbot/Teahouse_archival_notification --> == September 2019 == {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' You have shown interest in discussions about [[MOS:IBX|infoboxes]] and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> - [[User:SchroCat|SchroCat]] ([[User talk:SchroCat|talk]]) 19:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC) ==Things== Hi Bus stop. Noticing your recent difficulties and how I basically land on you side, a small tune[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_8RKEU0C0c]. some here have a very high opinion of you. [[User talk:Ceoil|<span style="color:#006633">Ceoil</span>]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 04:46, 15 September 2019 (UTC) :Seconded...[[User:Modernist|Modernist]] ([[User talk:Modernist|talk]]) 10:57, 15 September 2019 (UTC) ::Ceoil—thank you for that music. Thank you to Modernist and Ceoil for the expressed sentiments. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 13:07, 15 September 2019 (UTC) == Understanding EDITWAR == Re: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2018_Cincinnati_shooting&diff=915692493&oldid=915691067][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2018_Cincinnati_shooting&diff=915747178&oldid=915737650] It's important not to edit war. It's equally important to refrain from telling other editors "Don't [[WP:EDITWAR]]" when you are edit warring yourself. You stated on [[User:WWGB]]'s UTP, {{tq|I'm not going to follow you down the path of WP:EDITWARing.}}[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WWGB&diff=915753373&oldid=915753277] when you had already done exactly that. Please read the policy you are wielding, including the last sentence of its first paragraph: {{tq|"But my edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is no defense.}} Policy abuse is as disruptive as policy violation. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 10:39, 15 September 2019 (UTC) :You should probably ignore this policy wonk *baiting* fool. Step away from the trap. [[User talk:Ceoil|<span style="color:#006633">Ceoil</span>]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 11:11, 15 September 2019 (UTC) ::If I were looking to another editor for advice on how to act at Wikipedia, I really don't think it would be an editor with a block log like [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3ACeoil yours]. Seriously? But Bus stop is free to follow whatever advice he chooses and live with his own consequences. He's living with one now.{{pb}}Anyway, per the (quite unusual) rule Bus stop has established for his talk page [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bus_stop&diff=914127062&oldid=914126691 here], you shouldn't comment because I was not speaking to you (assuming of course that he applies the principle uniformly instead of weaponizing it). &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 11:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC) :The very definition of a strawman, in fairness well done, but used to further a campaign of harassment and baiting based on shallow and ungentlemanly reasoning. <s>Your single purpose career here is similar to anti-matter, adding nothing, disillusioning many; you are not respected.</s> [[User talk:Ceoil|<span style="color:#006633">Ceoil</span>]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 12:13, 15 September 2019 (UTC) ::I second Ceoil...[[User:Modernist|Modernist]] ([[User talk:Modernist|talk]]) 12:28, 15 September 2019 (UTC) ::You spew some of the best insults I've seen, I'm certainly no match for your talent for stinging rhetoric. I'm respected where it matters. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 12:33, 15 September 2019 (UTC) :You may want to re-examine your reason for being, and what you are trying to BRING to the project. My conclusions as to your plight are very different. Harsh, bitter, rules driven people like you are not very amusing to content people, while your bludgeoning superior approach invites dissent. [[User talk:Ceoil|<span style="color:#006633">Ceoil</span>]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 12:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC) ::Stunning lack of self-awareness. I'm done here, having accomplished my purpose for coming here with my initial post and wasted too much time already with pointless bickering. Happy editing. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 12:46, 15 September 2019 (UTC) :::Mandruss—something you haven't figured out yet is that there is logic apart from policy. You will probably bring me to ANI for saying that. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 13:06, 15 September 2019 (UTC) Related: [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Ceoil]]. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 14:54, 15 September 2019 (UTC) :Ceoil meant well because Ceoil was trying to prevent me from getting [[WP:BAIT|baited]] into responding in a way that would get me into trouble. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 15:59, 15 September 2019 (UTC) :For my trouble, I'm going back to helping Ewulp on the Velázquez page. Peace in our time. [[User talk:Ceoil|<span style="color:#006633">Ceoil</span>]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 18:23, 15 September 2019 (UTC) ::I appreciate your help in this section, as well as the previous section, {{u|Ceoil}}. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 18:40, 15 September 2019 (UTC) :::I'm sorry you got dragged into a bunch of other stuff, and you talk page was hijacked. [[User talk:Ceoil|<span style="color:#006633">Ceoil</span>]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 19:12, 15 September 2019 (UTC) ::::I don't mind at all. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC) ::::(Incidentally, I can't weigh in at AN/I, which is probably good for me, as I probably would have been there running my mouth by now.) [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 19:24, 15 September 2019 (UTC) :::::No matter, you didn't miss much. The usual bo&&&&. [[User talk:Ceoil|<span style="color:#006633">Ceoil</span>]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 21:08, 15 September 2019 (UTC) ::::::I think I read most of it. I just can't post there due to past infractions. I killed someone. But I swear it was in self-defense. All kidding aside, I hope you didn't get into trouble. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 21:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC) ::You need to cut down on that killing people stuff. Its frowned upon here, although not as much as late modernist paintings. [[User talk:Ceoil|<span style="color:#006633">Ceoil</span>]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 22:10, 15 September 2019 (UTC) :::Seconded...[[User:Modernist|Modernist]] ([[User talk:Modernist|talk]]) 11:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC) == [[2019 Dayton shooting]] == The discussion on [[Talk:2019 Dayton shooting]] closed soon after your last comment to it, so I'm replying here. We agree that our articles should be based on RS. However, you're asserting that info being in RS in regard to particular events mandates its inclusion in our articles about those events - but that's not the case. [[User:Jim Michael|Jim Michael]] ([[User talk:Jim Michael|talk]]) 13:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC) :Actually, {{u|Jim Michael}}, I have asserted nothing even remotely like that. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 14:19, 3 October 2019 (UTC) ::The inclusion of the names of the victims in RS is the most common reason you give for saying that they should be included in articles about events in which many people were killed. [[User:Jim Michael|Jim Michael]] ([[User talk:Jim Michael|talk]]) 15:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC) :::{{u|Jim Michael}}—you are merely misconstruing what I am saying. Nevertheless you may wish to weigh in [[Talk:Midland–Odessa shooting#Discussion|here]]. It is a newly-created "discussion" section (I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Midland%E2%80%93Odessa_shooting&diff=919396088&oldid=919157559 created] it) at [[Talk:Midland–Odessa shooting]]. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 13:55, 4 October 2019 (UTC) == Just a note == to tell that I don't agree with your repeated unilateral moves [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019_Halle_synagogue_attack_and_subsequent_shootings&diff=prev&oldid=920464020] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019_Halle_synagogue_attack_and_subsequent_shootings&diff=prev&oldid=920468502][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019_Halle_synagogue_attack_and_subsequent_shootings&diff=920718650&oldid=920718286] of the [[Halle and Landsberg attack]] article title. We should try to reach [[WP:Consensus]] in the [[Talk:Halle and Landsberg attack#Could page title be more accurate?|talk page]] section. [[User:Wakari07|Wakari07]] ([[User talk:Wakari07|talk]]) 13:11, 11 October 2019 (UTC) :I've responded to you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2019_Halle_synagogue_attack_and_subsequent_shootings&diff=920723572&oldid=920723213 here]. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 13:16, 11 October 2019 (UTC) ::Did you read [[WP:BADGER]], as I suggested to you previously [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3A2019_Halle_synagogue_attack_and_subsequent_shootings&type=revision&diff=920571357&oldid=920570265 here]? [[User:Wakari07|Wakari07]] ([[User talk:Wakari07|talk]]) 13:26, 11 October 2019 (UTC) :::Please note that I've [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2019_Halle_synagogue_attack_and_subsequent_shootings&diff=920725060&oldid=920724374 added more] to my post on the Talk page of the article we're discussing. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 13:39, 11 October 2019 (UTC) == Please comment on [[Talk:Impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump#rfc_012D022|Talk:Impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump]] == The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump#rfc_012D022|this request for comment on '''Talk:Impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 112028 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:34, 15 October 2019 (UTC) == Your thread has been archived == {| style="margin: 1em 4em;" |- valign="top" | [[File:WP teahouse logo 2.png|alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0]] | <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;"> Hi '''Bus stop'''! You created a thread called {{tq|problems at the Cebu article}} at [[Wikipedia:Teahouse]], but it has been [[WP:ARCHIVE|archived]] because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion [[Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1025#problems_at_the_Cebu_article|here]]. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Teahouse&action=edit&section=new&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Follow-up to [[Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1025#problems_at_the_Cebu_article|problems at the Cebu article]]}} create a new thread]. <small>Archival by {{noping|Lowercase sigmabot III}}, notification delivery by {{noping|Muninnbot}}, both [[WP:BOT|automated accounts]]. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{tlx|nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. [[User:Muninnbot|Muninnbot]] ([[User talk:Muninnbot|talk]]) 19:00, 16 October 2019 (UTC)</small> <div><small></small></div> </div> |}<!-- User:Tigraan-testbot/Teahouse_archival_notification --> == October 2019 == Your edits on 2019 Halle synagogue shooting: [[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive]] and have been or will be [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. * If you are engaged in an article [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|content dispute]] with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the [[:Help:Talk pages|article's talk page]], and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] page, and ask for independent help at one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests|relevant notice boards]]. * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]]. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies and guidelines]], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> [[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for that. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> [[User:Selfstudier|Selfstudier]] ([[User talk:Selfstudier|talk]]) 00:17, 17 October 2019 (UTC) == Please comment on [[Talk:Erica C. Barnett#rfc_A50DE3F|Talk:Erica C. Barnett]] == The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Erica C. Barnett#rfc_A50DE3F|this request for comment on '''Talk:Erica C. Barnett''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 113817 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC) == [[WP:ONUS]] and [[WP:BRD]] in relation to [[Greta Thunberg]] == Please review Wikipedia policy, most notably [[WP:ONUS]], which states in pertinent part, {{tq| The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is upon those seeking to include disputed content.}} Inclusion of the disputed material on [[Greta Thunberg]] has been repeatedly challenged and multiple editors have objected on the article talk page. It's incumbent on you to develop a consensus for inclusion; absent such a consensus, the material does not belong in the article. [[User:NorthBySouthBaranof|NorthBySouthBaranof]] ([[User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof|talk]]) 16:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC) == Invitation to discus the rule on whether to include the victims names == Dear Bus stop, I hereby invite you to discuss a possible new rule on whether or not the name of victims should be included on various articles (i.e. [[Stoneman Douglas High School shooting]], [[Santa Fe High School shooting]]. The discussion can be found here: [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(idea_lab)#Victims'_names_proposal_workshop]] [[User:TheHoax|TheHoax]] ([[User talk:TheHoax|talk]]) 17:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC) == ArbCom 2019 election voter message == <table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> <tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2019|2019 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019#Election_timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC) </td></tr> </table> <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=926750292 --> == The Hoax == TheHoax is not only temp blocked but also topic banned, as I CLEARLY stated TWICE: Once in the comment following my strikethrough, and again in that edit summary![https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Saugus_High_School_shooting&diff=927204433&oldid=927130697] They are two different things. Please stop interfering in areas that you demonstrably know nothing about. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 09:24, 21 November 2019 (UTC) == Your correction regarding ''the Economist'' == Greetings Bus stop, As the conversation has already moved on, I didn't want to interrupt the flow and add a comment on [[WT:MOS]]. I'm not exactly sure where you say my mistake is in what I wrote regarding ''the Economist''. I didn't include them in my list of style guides that recommend "it" for ships, and attempted to clearly state that they view ships as an exception to the general English practice of using gender-neutral pronouns for non-person nouns (in short, that they use "she" rather than "it" for ships). I then linked the entire text for others to read, which you later quoted. I didn't mention them because they bolster my argument, I did so in the interest of being thorough and transparent. [[User:Cthomas3|'''''<span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: larger; color: black;"><span style="color: brown;">C</span>Thomas<sup style="font-size: x-small; color: brown;">3</sup></span>''''']] ([[User talk:Cthomas3|talk]]) 17:24, 27 November 2019 (UTC) :{{u|Cthomas3}}—I don't believe I said you made a mistake. I said something to that effect to user Doremo. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 17:36, 27 November 2019 (UTC) ::Greetings Bus stop, I was referring to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=928157921&oldid=928156959&diffmode=source this edit] directly below my posting of ''the Economist's'' style guide where you begin with {{tq|Incorrect concerning [[The Economist]]:}}. Doremo hadn't yet posted. [[User:Cthomas3|'''''<span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: larger; color: black;"><span style="color: brown;">C</span>Thomas<sup style="font-size: x-small; color: brown;">3</sup></span>''''']] ([[User talk:Cthomas3|talk]]) 18:06, 27 November 2019 (UTC) :::Oh yes, maybe I was speaking to you, {{u|Cthomas3}}. I stand corrected. And I will try to make a correction to what I posted. Sorry. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 18:11, 27 November 2019 (UTC) ::::No problem at all. I thought you and I were saying the same thing, but if I really did make a mistake I would have been happy to correct it. [[User:Cthomas3|'''''<span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: larger; color: black;"><span style="color: brown;">C</span>Thomas<sup style="font-size: x-small; color: brown;">3</sup></span>''''']] ([[User talk:Cthomas3|talk]]) 18:19, 27 November 2019 (UTC) :::{{u|Cthomas3}}—I've made [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style&diff=928232073&oldid=928231345 this edit] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style&diff=next&oldid=928232073 this edit] to try to rectify my previous besmirching of your good character. Please accept the apologies of this humbled supplicant. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 18:23, 27 November 2019 (UTC) Hi Bus stop, please stop [[WP:BLUDGEONING]] this discussion at [[WT:MOS]]. You do not need to respond to every comment. (Some of them are making you come across as deaf on top of the bludgeoning, which is not helping.) --[[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 03:15, 10 December 2019 (UTC) :Hi {{u|Izno}}—[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style&diff=930148694&oldid=930147055 this] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style&diff=next&oldid=930148694 this] are just joking comments. I think that sort of thing should be permissible.<P>By the way that discussion is a hopeless quagmire. There is no intellectual honesty or willingness to address the subject. After I posted two comments asking to examine actual usages of "she" and "her" in relation to ships, two things transpired: additional quotes damning the use of "she" and "her" in relation to ships were provided, and a subject header was inserted ''above my comments'' indicating that we were looking for more examples of commentary denouncing this usage. This would be a variation on [[moving the goalposts]]. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 15:31, 10 December 2019 (UTC) ::I'm talking about the entire discussion, not specific points or "joking comments". Which, the concerns are a sensitive area, and "joking" probably is not in your best interests accordingly. Please leave off the discussion for a few days or even just let it go until the end of the discussion. If others think that someone supporting the proposed change needs to be challenged, I'm sure they will do so. --[[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 17:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC) :::{{u|Izno}}—how about BLP violations? Can I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style&diff=930300878&oldid=930298506 weigh in] to <strike>remove</strike> address BLP violations? I don't get the idea of calling someone a {{tq|"shitty human being"}}. It's interesting that "she" and "her" are deemed impermissible for use with ships but a bona fide human being can be referred to as a {{tq|"shitty human being"}}! [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 15:43, 11 December 2019 (UTC) == Problem editor == Thanks for your corrections. SharabSalam seems to be a bit problematic on the Black Hebrew Israelites article. They had Capers Funnye as "the leader of the Black Hebrew Israelites" when such a concept is obviously at odds with what our article says and what the news story said. They also removed the attributed statement that both shooters had expressed interest in BHI. Without looking at the rest of their edit history, it makes me wonder if they have some interest in sanitizing this coverage. Bears some watching. [[User:DIYeditor|—DIYeditor]] ([[User talk:DIYeditor|talk]]) 15:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC) Ah, but I notice you were at one point supposed to be staying away from articles on this topic? When/why did that end? I'm not sure that will be helpful in dealing with SharabSalam if there is some underyling problem with them. [[User:DIYeditor|—DIYeditor]] ([[User talk:DIYeditor|talk]]) 16:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC) :Thank you, {{u|DIYeditor}}. It is on my watchlist. As concerns {{tq|"staying away from articles on this topic"}}—what do you mean? I'm not aware of being under any kind of restriction. I've had my run-ins with the law, but I'm a relatively free man now. The only restriction in place now is that I'm not allowed to weigh in at AN/I, unless of course I am the subject of a report/complaint. I don't mind that restriction. I actually enjoy having less to do with weighing in about complaints about other editors. It allows me to stay clear of Wikipedia as a social site—intellectual ideas are much more interesting. My [[early-onset Alzheimer's]] interferes with my intellectual pursuits—but I don't let that get me down. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 16:25, 22 December 2019 (UTC) ::"For the foreseeable future I have made the decision to voluntarily stay away from the topics that have caused contention" from [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive827#Topic ban for Bus stop]] - AndyTheGrump and Guy Macon's proposals would seem to apply to Jewish identity and Judaism. Doesn't matter to me, I am not familiar with the Jewish-tagging dispute or any of that, just did not want to taint any actions against SharabSalam, should it come to that, with other disputes. [[User:DIYeditor|—DIYeditor]] ([[User talk:DIYeditor|talk]]) 16:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC) :::{{u|DIYeditor}}—I think SharabSalam was mistaken when they [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Hebrew_Israelites&diff=931934062&oldid=931778222 wrote] {{tq|"The Black Hebrew Israelites leader, Rabbi Capers Funnye..."}} I think I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Hebrew_Israelites&diff=931969729&oldid=931968638 corrected] that mistake when I changed it to {{tq|"Rabbi [[Capers Funnye]], the head of a separate organization called [[Beth Shalom B'nai Zaken Ethiopian Hebrew Congregation]]..."}} The only thing that matters is that the reader receive the best representation of the material found in sources. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 17:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC) == Final warning == [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Naval_Air_Station_Pensacola_shooting&diff=932287260&oldid=932268562 This] is quite enough. If I see one more comment in which you personalize victims' names discussions against me, I will try my hand at the first [[WP:AE]] complaint of my career and I will propose a topic ban from anything related to victims' names. I believe that's the correct venue, since the article is under discretionary sanctions. '''Discuss content, not editors,''' and how many times have you been told that nobody is required to discuss until you say they have discussed enough? Notifying admins {{u|MelanieN}} and {{u|El_C}}. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 01:35, 25 December 2019 (UTC) :{{u|Mandruss}}—I apologize if I offended you. "Personalizing" the discussion was only intended as a manner of speaking. But if I offended I apologize. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 15:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC) ::It was another instance in a series of dozens spanning years, of you trying to dictate how I participate in discussions without wide support for your views in that regard (ie, they are novel views). It's not about my being offended; it's about disruption of article talk pages. You need to [[WP:STICK|drop that stick]] or take the question to the community for comment. I hope your Christmas has been a joyous one. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 04:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC) Bus stop, just for your information: you have made 26 edits to that talk page, the most of any editor (the next two are at 15 apiece), and you have contributed 24% of the total added text on that page, also the most of any editor. Just something to think about. And I do agree with Mandruss that it is inappropriate to demand that someone respond to you, or that they deal with your issues to your satisfaction. Just say what you want to say and let the discussion take its course. -- [[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 04:29, 26 December 2019 (UTC) :{{tq|"I do agree with Mandruss that it is inappropriate to demand that someone respond to you"}} {{u|MelanieN}}—so you're saying you approve of canned text suggesting there are privacy concerns with little to no further dialogue? At every RfC {{u|Mandruss}} asserts {{tq|"Further, there are arguable privacy concerns."}} This is recorded text, also known as [[Boilerplate text]]. I'm supposed to engage that text in dialogue? And get very little in reply? In my opinion this is not a minor point. If there are privacy concerns then I don't want Wikipedia to include the victim names. I don't want Wikipedia to do harm. I want Wikipedia to do good. We are an informative project. But we should not want to spread information that brings harm to people. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 06:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC) ::Mandruss can say what he wants to say. So can you. He is not required to engage in "further dialogue". All you have to say is something like "I don't think Mandruss has established that" or "I don't think there is a privacy issue, here's why." The point of an extended discussion like this one is to state your opinion and your reasoning, and if there is not a clear consensus, let the ultimate closer decide how to weight your opinion and that of other people. The point is not to argue with other people until they either give in and admit you are right, or convince you that they are right. That approach just becomes a wall of repetitious argument, ultimately ending in [[WP:BLUDGEON|bludgeoning]]. Keep in mind the wise saying: When I argue with someone, my goal is not to convince them. My goal is to convince the onlookers. -- [[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 06:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC) :::Canned text is an abomination, {{u|MelanieN}}. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 06:30, 26 December 2019 (UTC) :::{{ping|MelanieN}} I've been around Bus stop a lot more than you have, and rest assured that s/he is incapable of both (1) responding to reason and (2) deferring to others based on their numbers and experience levels. What s/he believes is indisputable fact, and any number of editors who see things differently, no matter who they are, are simply wrong. That's long-term [[WP:IDHT]] and [[WP:DE]] by any definition I'm aware of, and it leaves us with only one way of dealing with Bus stop{{snd}}the more direct: "You don't need to understand or agree. Stop doing it or risk a topic ban or site ban." &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 08:40, 26 December 2019 (UTC) ::::Mandruss, you launched this thread on Bus stop's talk page telling them to stop personalizing discussions. Since you are contemplating a formal complaint, it was appropriate for you to warn them. They heard you and responded. I then chimed in with some advice, which they may or may not have heard (apparently not based on their reaction, which I chose not to respond to). End of discussion - except that you decided to double down, by repeating your own opinion of how they post and how they are capable of reacting. You might have done better to take your own advice about personalizing discussions. -- [[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 16:01, 26 December 2019 (UTC) ::::: Lots of personalizing happens at UTPs, and there is little to disrupt at UTPs. In fact, this discussion was personal from its first comment. Posting warnings on UTPs is inherently personalizing discussions{{snd}}it's discussing editors, not content. I used to argue this issue on the ATPs where it occurred, thereby personalizing those discussions in the other direction, but I have stopped doing that and now try to ignore Bus stop's comments whenever possible.{{pb}}I have addressed only one aspect of Bus stop's persistent ATP disruption here, the part that directly affects me. I have listed eight problem areas on my computer{{snd}}most of which have been pointed out in article talk at least once{{snd}}where they will remain for the time being. If other editors feel it's constructive to go round and round with Bus stop in one ATP discussion after another (at least one apparently does) that's entirely up to them. But Bus stop will cease his campaign of trying to impose his novel views on proper talk page behavior on me or he will respond to an AE complaint. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 18:06, 26 December 2019 (UTC) :::::{{tq|"They heard you and responded."}} I more than heard them and responded. I apologized. I admit wrongdoing. I should not have spoken the way I did. I'm sorry. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 16:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC) ::::::You apologized for offending me. You gave no indication that you will cease trying to dictate how I participate in discussions, and in fact your subsequent comments suggest that do not intend to. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 18:06, 26 December 2019 (UTC) :::::Question for you, Mandruss—why do you post [[boilerplate text]] at RfCs on victim names? I believe the most recent instance of this can be seen [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Naval_Air_Station_Pensacola_shooting&diff=next&oldid=929898836 here] at [[Talk:Naval Air Station Pensacola shooting]]. But you are repeating that canned text at many RfCs on the subject of victim names. Why canned text? [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 16:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC) ::::::I have answered that question at least twice in article talk discussions{{snd}}at some length{{snd}}including in the latest discussion. Question for you, Bus stop—why do you repeatedly ask editors to answer questions that have already been answered multiple times, pretending that you are asking them for the first time? &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 18:06, 26 December 2019 (UTC) ==Happy Holidays== {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" |[[File:Bonheur Matisse.jpg|thumb|360px|]] |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Season's greetings!''' |- |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I hope this holiday season is festive and fulfilling and filled with love and kindness, and that 2020 will be safe, successful and rewarding...keep hope alive....[[User:Modernist|Modernist]] ([[User talk:Modernist|talk]]) 02:13, 25 December 2019 (UTC) |} ==Happy Holidays== {| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FFF7E6;" |rowspan="2" valign="right" | [[File:Jean Metzinger, 1916, Femme au miroir, detail.jpg|180px]] |rowspan="2" | |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | '''Season's Greetings''' |- |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Happy Holiday Season Bus stop and best wishes for 2020. [[User:Coldcreation|Coldcreation]] ([[User talk:Coldcreation|talk]]) 10:25, 25 December 2019 (UTC) |} == Talkback == {{Talkback|TomCat4680}} {{Talkback|TomCat4680}} == Great pic.. Oooooh! == Aaaaah... NOW I see what you mean.. I would have replied on the Greta talk page, but felt it was probably more appropriate to reply directly to you. The stars in the EU flag do almost make a halo, in a way. Thats not something I would usually look for, much less pick up on. Especially in a biographic image. You might have a point. I read you are an artist, and that matters in this specific instance. Im not, so it isnt something I would see. For anyone with an artistic eye, you may have a good point. For those who dont, like me, you may not. Its a matter of opinion, I believe. And thats the issue, from me, its a belief. So now, for my opinion, all I can say is: maybe defer to the artist? As a non-artist, and someone who has been only a general reader of Wikipedia for over a decade, I wouldve HAD to have you point that out in order for me to see that. Its something to condsider, but I do not at all discredit your point of view on this. You MIGHT be on to something, logically. I will refrain from futher comment on the pic. If anything Ive said here on your talkpage you wish to use in furthering your arguement on that talkpage for Greta? By all means go for it, I wont be offended or anything. But I do feel I should step back and let others have say, as Im not sure if I have anything more to contribute if I am so on the fence.. You are absoutely welcome to use this msg on that Greta talkpage to tear my own pov apart if need be. I wont take it wrong. Whatever is logical, reasonable, and you feel furthers a good contribution to Wikipedia. And thank you for making it clear where that image came from. It makes far more sense now. :) Debates are fun. For that, I am not sorry. Haha XD Consensus, right? Its a way we all learn, gain wisdom, see another point of view. And, thank you, for your patience and willingness to put up with my long ass posts. ^_^ Cheers, Bus stop! [[User:SageSolomon|SageSolomon]] ([[User talk:SageSolomon|talk]]) 03:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC) :You are obsessed by GT. Leave her alone. [[Special:Contributions/86.187.233.204|86.187.233.204]] ([[User talk:86.187.233.204|talk]]) 15:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC) == Precious anniversary == {{User QAIbox | title = Precious | image = Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg | image_upright = 0.3 | bold = [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/Precious#Bus stop|Three years!]] }} --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:48, 4 February 2020 (UTC) :Thank you, {{u|Gerda Arendt}}, that is kind of you. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 05:06, 7 February 2020 (UTC) == Last warning == This is the second time you change my comment, third time and I will report the issue to the [[WP:ANI]].--[[User:SharabSalam|SharʿabSalam▼]] ([[User talk:SharabSalam|talk]]) 23:52, 20 February 2020 (UTC) == Sorry for bothering you, but... == <div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> [[File:Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg|left|100px]] :::::'''New Page Patrol needs experienced volunteers''' ::::* [[WP:NPP|New Page Patrol]] is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help. ::::* Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but <u>it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines</u>; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference. ::::* If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers#New_Page_Reviewer|granting conditions]] and review our [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol|instructions page]]. You can apply for the user-right '''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/New_page_reviewer|HERE]]'''. — '''''<small>[[User:Insertcleverphrasehere|Insertcleverphrasehere]] ^{([[User talk:Insertcleverphrasehere|or here]])}<small><small>_{([[WP:NPP|click me!)]]}</small></small></small>''''' 20:39, 1 March 2020 (UTC) </div> == Need advice == Hi, Bus stop. We've interacted on the [[Greta Thunberg]] talk page. I've fallen into a minor edit war, and I would like your opinion. I don't even remember how I chanced on this page, but I added it to my watch list and then saw a user removing a large chunk of information, well-referenced (I thought), about the current news on this person [[Indur M. Goklany]]. This other user says it's inappropriate allegations on a BOLP. I think it's statements of fact, well verified. Am I wrong? Paulmlieberman ([[User talk:Paulmlieberman#top|talk]]) 19:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC) :Thanks, {{u|Paulmlieberman}}. I've [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KipHansen&diff=943955725&oldid=33835583 suggested] to {{u|KipHansen}} that they start a section on [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard]], or you could do the same. Real-life precludes in-depth Wikipedia involvement at this time. But I'm flattered to be asked for my arguably nonexistent expertise. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 20:52, 4 March 2020 (UTC) == You were a man of many words == I'll always remember some of them. Don't worry, ''you're'' not gone. But I'm getting there! [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 02:53, 13 March 2020 (UTC) :{{u|InedibleHulk}}—I really just want to survive to find out how this COVID-19 thing works out. I would hate to die and miss the end of the story. Will science come to the rescue? [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 04:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC) ::God only knows. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 04:16, 13 March 2020 (UTC) == Trump Coronavirus == Appreciate some your comments on Trump’s talk page regarding the coronavirus. There is a new rfc at the bottom on proposed wording that is less politicized and dramatic, and more encyclopedic. Appreciate it if you weighed in. Cheers✌️[[User:Bsubprime7|Bsubprime7]] ([[User talk:Bsubprime7|talk]]) 04:14, 12 April 2020 (UTC) :Thanks for the nice comments, {{u|Bsubprime7}}. I will check it out the mentioned RfC. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 04:31, 12 April 2020 (UTC) == Your revision of Trump talk post == I asked you to undo your after the fact revision of your talk page post, to which I had already replied. It violates [[WP:TPG]]. You can then make the same point in a subsequent post that will make the meanings of our messages clear to editors who see them at a later time. Thanks.[[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 16:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC) == GW's age == I have some questions for you about this. I'll number them for easy reference in your reply(s). #Perhaps you can explain to me how the article could have been improved by successive edits in that specific case. You added the age to the first sentence. Other editors, experienced editors acting in good faith, felt it didn't belong there. They are allowed to disagree with you on that point, and in fact such disagreements are a basic part of editing. How does one resolve that difference by successive edits? #Also I would like to know why it was a problem that your edit was reverted "immediately". Should Jim Michael have waited before reverting it? How long? Toward what end? #If you feel that Jim Michael should have started a discussion instead of reverting, do you claim that that is widespread practice? Not in my experience. In fact I can't recall the last time I saw that happen. Can you point me to two instances? Please try to be responsive. Directly answer the questions asked, rather than sidestepping them with general philosophical aphorisms about Wikipedia editing. Doing that makes you seem evasive and dodgy, a bob-and-weave artist. I know you understand this concept since you said [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2020_Nova_Scotia_attacks&diff=953542716&oldid=953538439 here] that Jim Michael was "avoiding the question". (And, incidentally, he had just answered the question you asked, which may or may not have been the question you sought an answer to.) &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 08:54, 29 April 2020 (UTC) ::Sorry for the delay, {{u|Mandruss}}. I simply prefer not to revert editors except for egregious changes to articles. One aspect of editing is "looking" at edits, and thinking about edits. It is like listening to another person when they speak. Immediately reverting takes the edit out of view, and obviates "looking" at the suggestion of a supposedly "collaborating" editor. For non-egregious edits, immediate reversion impairs viewing what another editor has "suggested" by removing it from view. What "tolerance" means to me in this context (I think explain further on the article Talk page) is allowing non-egregious edits to remain in view for awhile, to be only gently altered, or for a discussion section to be initiated on the article Talk page. I've explained myself a little more fully at [[Talk:2020 Nova Scotia attacks#Dead and injured dogs]] and the origin of this issue can be found in archives at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2020_Nova_Scotia_attacks/Archive_4#age_in_lede age in lede]. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 16:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC) :::I think the point you're missing is that your ideas about this are not widely accepted{{snd}}actually I had never heard of anything resembling them before you{{snd}}and yet you seek to impose them on others because of some inherent "rightness" that you see in them. ''That's fundamentally un-Wikipedian'', and when it persists for years it increasingly pisses off some editors who care about such things. But my experience is as limited as anybody's. Do you claim widespread support for your ideas? Can you point to one or two situations where other editors endorsed them? Or is this just more Wikipedia According to Bus stop?{{pb}}You haven't explained how successive edits can improve GW's age in the lead. If you misspoke (or misthought), just say so. If you were speaking generally about something unrelated to the immediate issue you were talking about (GW's age in the lead), I would submit that that is not helpful, and that it's an example of the philosophical excursions that are a large part of the problem. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 03:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC) ::::{{tq|"If you misspoke (or misthought), just say so."}} What I'm wrong about is addressing this issue on [[Talk:2020 Nova Scotia attacks]]. I have [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2020_Nova_Scotia_attacks&diff=prev&oldid=954808484 struck that through], {{u|Mandruss}}. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop#top|talk]]) 12:34, 4 May 2020 (UTC) :::::Once again, you ignore what was said and change the subject. I'm not sure what that's about, and I waver between seeing that as the behavior of a crafty politician and that of someone incapable of directly addressing others' comments. Either way, it's damned aggravating. Please disregard this thread as a waste of my time. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#888;">&#9742;</span>]] 12:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC) ==New message from Acalycine== {{talkback|Talk:Li Wenliang|Not a whistleblower|ts=03:49, 7 May 2020 (UTC)}} Please see proposal by Ohconfucius and inquiry about the definition of whistleblower - seeking your thoughts and consensus on this issue. [[User:Acalycine|Acalycine]] ([[User talk:Acalycine|talk]]) 03:49, 7 May 2020 (UTC) ==Important Notice== {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 09:07, 28 May 2020 (UTC) {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 12:32, 28 May 2020 (UTC)'