Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tampa Bay Parenting Magazine
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tampa Bay Parenting Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Clearly PROMO. No links to any critical discussions of the magazine, all I find are articles they've published. Oaktree b (talk) 16:34, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Social science, and Florida. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 16:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Article edited to now include dozens of reliable and authoritative sources. Notability is presumed for magazines under WP:NMEDIA that verifiably meet, through reliable sources, one or more of the WP:NMEDIA criteria. Tampa Bay Parenting Magazine meets at least one, and probably all of them. It has (1) produced works that have received well-known/significant journalism award (multiple Florida Magazine Assn awards); (2) has a significant history (15+ years of issues); (3) considered by reliable sources to be authoritative / influential in subject area (cited dozens of times by every local TV station and newspaper); (4) frequently cited by reliable sources (cited dozens of times by every local TV station and newspaper); and (5) significant publications in non-trivial niche markets (Tampa Bay area, parenting).
- Leglamp123 (talk) 00:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- For what it's worth WP:NMEDIA has been deprecated as a subject-specific notability guideline; it's currently an essay that lacks community consensus in support of it. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:14, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)- Keep While, it does have some issues with promo from the old version. With the edits however, it now seems like a fairly normal and good wikipedia article. It has a lot of sources and doing a quick Safari search wields a lot of results about them. Sorry if anyone disagrees with this. Have a good day. Tvshowoflife (talk) 18:50, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Simply no WP:IS WP:RS discuss the subject directly and indpeth. Affliated orgs publishing their works and promo articles do not meet the guidelines. // Timothy :: talk 21:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:29, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete fails [WP:IS] MetricMaster (talk) 08:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)