Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double chicken wing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 14:18, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 14:18, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Professional wrestling holds#Elevated double chickenwing. (non-admin closure) PeterSymonds (talk) 16:45, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Double chicken wing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Non-notable wrestling move. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 02:37, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, their iss know sorces. -- Jeandré, 2008-12-07t02:54z- Redirect to Professional wrestling holds#Elevated double chickenwing. It's a notable wrestling move, just not enough to warrant a seperate article. TJ Spyke 03:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Professional wrestling holds#Elevated double chickenwing. It doesn't need its own article, but it would be a valid redirect. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 05:53, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect Nikki♥311 01:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect, either to the pro wrestling article mentioned above or possibly to Collegiate wrestling, where it is also used to pin an opponent. In either case, it doesn't warrant its own article. MuZemike (talk) 02:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Pile-on redirect ayematthew ✡ 23:50, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.