Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christa Gelpke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Christa Gelpke

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacking Notability, also see 1. at WP:NOT. Please note that I have a COI as I was asked whether a deletion would be possible by Christa Gelpke's descendants. I strongly believe, though, that she is not notable as there is no broad media coverage about her and the other notability criteria for persons are also not met. Best, Conandcon (talk) 09:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - there are sources, that much is clear, but they aren't great. Mostly passing mentions in articles about properties owned by her family, the mention in Forbes (which is accurate but routine and not particularly deep (and is mostly about her living relatives)), and some German-language sources which seem to also be passing mentions. Ultimately, notability is not inherited, even if her wealth was. Appreciate Conandcon's COI declaration but I feel this nomination would be just as valid from anyone else. I made some minor edits to the article for BLP compliance purposes but couldn't find anything of substance to add. St★lwart¹¹¹ 12:21, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Gelpke's probably not notable and any slight notability that may exist probably doesn't outweigh her descendants' wish for deletion. Furius (talk) 02:50, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.