Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artdc.org
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Artdc.org (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete Seems to fail WP:NOTE as there is no WP:SIGCOV. All external links are minor references and most of the links on the article are defunct. Possibly could be salvaged at a later point, but WP:TNT seems the way to go unless it gets cleaned up. Tooncool64 (talk) 21:58, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Organizations, and Washington, D.C.. Shellwood (talk) 22:05, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- I just massively stubbed it, but I'm still confused by what it is, or was. It seems to have a tie to Artomatic, but I'm not sure a redirect there makes sense. I'll try to keep working on it during the AfD if I can. Star Mississippi 23:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete – no independent citations, either. The only citation is a self-reference. Ira Leviton (talk)
- Delete. Redirecting to Artomatic would make sense if the page mention it. Suitskvarts (talk) 09:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.