Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 105: Line 105:
These RfCs still need to meet the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.
These RfCs still need to meet the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.


Wikipedia:Requests for comment/[[Jeffrey O. Gustafson]]
'''[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jeffrey O. Gustafson]]'''

Allegations: {Abuse of Admin powers, disregarding other Admin comments, abusive language, re [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu Ebony Anpu first AfD]}
Allegations: {Abuse of Admin powers, disregarding other Admin comments, abusive language, re [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu Ebony Anpu first AfD]}
:* Jeffrey ignores votes by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=next&oldid=107344921 1], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=prev&oldid=107428667 2], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=next&oldid=107437587 3] Wikipedia Editors with history, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=next&oldid=107449414 1], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=next&oldid=107663279 2] Wikipedia Administrators in favor of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=next&oldid=107340541 1], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=next&oldid=107399701 2], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=next&oldid=107693690 anonymous editors] with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=next&oldid=107692427 no edit history].
:* Jeffrey ignores votes by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=next&oldid=107344921 1], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=prev&oldid=107428667 2], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=next&oldid=107437587 3] Wikipedia Editors with history, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=next&oldid=107449414 1], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=next&oldid=107663279 2] Wikipedia Administrators in favor of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=next&oldid=107340541 1], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=next&oldid=107399701 2], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=next&oldid=107693690 anonymous editors] with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebony_Anpu%2C_first_try&diff=next&oldid=107692427 no edit history].

Revision as of 01:33, 22 February 2007

This process is for discussing specific users who have violated Wikipedia policies and guidelines. In order to request comments on a user's actions, follow the instructions to create a subpage in the section below. Disputes over the writing of articles, including disputes over how best to follow the NPOV policy, belong in Article content disputes.

Uncertified user RfCs

Requests for comment which do not meet the minimum requirements 48 hours after creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed. See Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Request comment on users for the minimum requirements. The subject RFC page will also be deleted, unless the subject has explicitly requested it to be retained.

Closing and archiving

Disputes may be removed from this page and archived under any of the following circumstances:

  1. If no additional complaints are registered for an extended period of time, and the dispute appears to have stopped.
  2. The parties to the dispute agree.
  3. The dispute proceeds to another method of dispute resolution, such as mediation or arbitration.

Remove the link from the list here and add it to the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive. If the dispute is handled in mediation or arbitration, please make a note of where the dispute resolution process continued.

General user conduct

Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges or the choice of username. To list a user conduct dispute, please create a subpage using Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Example user as a template, and then list it as follows:

Example user
{one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~ (note: that is five tildes, not four, RFCs are signed with the date only, not your username)

Candidate pages

These RfCs still need to meet the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.

RB972
Allegations: RB972 writes this article on Jung Myung Seok, reverts all other edits despite reasons and verifiable evidence given, and on discussion pages, makes accusations of identity fraud. This person also has been sending threatening e-mails and messages to who he thinks are the editors. He also uses "hate" websites as reference to the article. 19:08, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Biophys
Allegations:Unstoppable stalking, uncivilty, intimidation and harassing. WP:STALK, WP:BLP, WP:CIV 18:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Approved pages

These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.

Jobstbrandt

WP:NOR, WP:CITE, WP:REF, WP:DE and potentially WP:CIVIL.17:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

LSLM
User:LSLM has been committing persistent personal attacks for a long time, along with other disruptive behaviour such as violation of 3RR rule and vandalism. 23:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Vlad fedorov
Persistent WP:STALK violations 14:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Also WP:BLP and WP:CIV violations. 21:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Evrik
Has falsely accused an editor of harassment and wikistalking, is disruptive, and refuses to accept fair use policy. 00:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
L0b0t
User-talk page incivility, treating content disputes as vandalism.
Abu badali
This RFC did not appear to be listed. Claims of wikistalking and deceptive and disruptive behavior. To do with listing images as Replacable Fair Use.
Vergina
Abuse of user page as a political soapbox, inflammatory username. 14:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Macedonia
Abuse of user page as a political soapbox, inflammatory username, image abuse. 13:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
KazakhPol
WP:NPOV, WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, WP:3RR violations 22:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
JJay
Abortive second go-around after failed refactoring: Issues of civility, talk page obfuscation, and providing sources. - 07:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Calton
Incivility, personal attacks, failure to assume good faith. 08:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
ForrestLane42
Incivility, personal attacks, accusations of sockpuppetry on both sides, harassment. - 18:07 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Nationalist
3RR, Sock, personal attacks, etc. concerning the political issues of naming convention with Taiwan/ROC. 02:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
BWCNY
WP:NOR, WP:CIVIL, other issues. 23:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Logicus
WP:DE, WP:NOR, WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA 15:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Rangeley
WP:SOAP, WP:POINT, Wikipedia:Vote-stacking 11:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Darkcat21
WP:V, WP:CITE, WP:NPA, and WP:3RR
Aminz
WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:3RR violations 21:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Use of administrator privileges

This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by Wikipedia:Administrators. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, and blocking or unblocking users. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the General user conduct section above. To list a dispute, create a subpage using the following sample as a template:

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Example admin
Allegations: {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~

As with disputes over general user conduct, at least two people must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted.

Candidate pages

These RfCs still need to meet the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jeffrey O. Gustafson

Allegations: {Abuse of Admin powers, disregarding other Admin comments, abusive language, re Ebony Anpu first AfD}

  • Jeffrey ignores votes by 1, 2, 3 Wikipedia Editors with history, and 1, 2 Wikipedia Administrators in favor of 1, 2, anonymous editors with no edit history.
  • Jeffrey re-opens AfD after it is closed by Adrian, reopened by anon-user and then reclosed by Admin, then leaves Comment that is inaccurate and misleading.
  • Some of this was brought up in ANI and An Admin recommended that Jeffrey recuse himself from the AfD, which he has still refused to do. In addition he has been very rude with me (more diffs to come). This is a very complicated case, involving 2 AfD's, 1 article, 3 ANI's, 1 DRV, and several user talk pages. It is not my intention to waste anyone's time, but after careful analysis of Jeffrey O. Gustafson's edit history I have come to question him. I have quite a bit of data about this matter, but in an effort to keep things as simple as possible, this is all I will post for now. I would appreciate comment from others. Thanks. Captain Barrett 01:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As with disputes over general user conduct, at least two people must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted.

Samuel Blanning

Allegations: Abuse of DRV closure during an ongoing debate. --badlydrawnjeff talk 20:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ryulong

Allegations: Blocking me (as Powerrangerbuster) and other new user accounts for "trolling" after making only a few edits to Power ranger related articles. Recently promoted per a third RFA, which passed by a narrow margin with over 50 oppose votes. PRBuster2007 20:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Approved pages

These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.

Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington.
Allegations: Irregularities in AfD closes. (Moved from original request at WP:RfArb) 23:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Yamla
Allegations: Yamla has inappropriately used his administrative privileges in editorial conflicts, blocking users indiscriminately and inappropriately (and later being compelled to unblock said editors). 15:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Trödel
Allegations: Trödel took personal offense at my request that he cite his sources for a statement he made, and subsequently forbid me from discussing anything with him, illegimately blocked me for a threat that I never made, and has been keeping a vulture-eye on my edit history even though he agreed not to in an ANI I previously filed seeking protection from him. 05:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)