Jump to content

User talk:Xb2u7Zjzc32

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shii (talk | contribs) at 09:04, 3 July 2015 (Notification: listing at articles for deletion of FBReader. using TW). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Xb2u7Zjzc32, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Cadbury Castle, Somerset. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Rod talk 08:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Boss 429 + Boss 429 Mustang

Hi; you left a message on my User page concerning the above articles. As I have never edited either of the articles, and know nothing about the subject, I think you may have sent this message to the wrong user.Anaxial (talk) 07:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Hope

There is no need for the complete listing of each program on this page. There is a link to the main page that has the identical list already in the article, this is just redundant and unnecessary. Please do not revert this again, it's a waste of time and could arguably perceived as spam. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moneymaker? I don't have a moneymaker on Wikipedia and there's nothing to accessed on or from a Wikipedia article that does that. However, there are specific policies regarding what can and cannot be direct linked on Wikipedia pages and links that directly trigger a download or require other applications to access may not be directly linked. The links you've tried posting to Bob Hope fall under that policy. A link to a page that lists files is acceptable if those files are directly relevant to an article's subject, but not the file itself. Wildhartlivie (talk) 10:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, don't repost the response I make here onto my talk page, if I felt the need to post a response there, I would do so. Secondly, the link that is already on Bob Hope is http://www.freeotrshows.com/otr/b/Bob_Hope_Show.html, although it isn't "my website", it is the website that was added by someone else at some point in time. You are well aware of that since you posted direct links to the files that are also located on that site. Thirdly, I'm not sure that I appreciate the confrontational tone in your posts to my page, please be civil. Finally, the policy regarding external links is at WP:EL and the list that specifically cites media rich links is at WP:ELNO. The link to the archive page is already there, the individual files do not need to be listed as well, especially when it triggers a download when clicked directly from the Wikipedia page. Wildhartlivie (talk) 11:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mae West

Regarding this edit, we do not link via imbedded external links like this. We especially do not link to user comments on IMDB. They are opinions submitted by users and are in no way considered anything other than someone's personal opinion, which has no place in an encyclopedia article. Please do not imbed external links into articles in this way anymore. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 10:17, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Xb2u7Zjzc32, take note of the above message. Thank you. E. Báthory talk/contr. 02:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Cuban missile crisis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — raekyt 22:56, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chocolate Shoppe Ice Cream Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Overrun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Harlem Shake (song)

Thank you for your edit to Harlem Shake (song). Unfortunately, the material you added is already present in the article Harlem Shake (meme), where information dealing with a video description seems relevant. If you have any questions about the content's removal, feel free to ask me at my talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 03:49, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube should not be used as a source, as it involves self-published material. The artist posting the song on YouTube is not an official release, and the song's earliest appearance is discussed in the article's background section already. This addition disrupted the flow of the section's prose and introduced an anachronistic overview of YouTube post, meme going viral, and something about the dance in the video not being the actual Harlem Shake dance, which is explained at Harlem Shake (meme). The "commercial performance" section covers the idea that "The 30-second video featured people dancing to the song" and makes no allusion to the Harlem Shake dance. The meme going viral is also covered in that section's first paragraph. The only connection of the dance to this song is the vocal that is sampled, which is discussed in the "music and lyrics" section. Dan56 (talk) 04:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Hello, I'm Lester Foster. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Harlem Shake (song), because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Lester Foster (talk | talk) 08:22, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Harlem Shake (song). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 03:35, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Better Living Through Circuitry may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • scene - Joel T Jordan; Jason A Jordan; Earth Program Ltd.; Summer Forest Hoeckel|oclc=42726291}}]</ref><ref>[http://www.gfsproductions.com/info/thanks.html (Nick, Joel, Jason, Rob, Guav, Andrew,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:25, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Airship hangar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • at [[Bartolomeu de Gusmão Airport]], [[Santa Cruz, Rio de Janeiro|Santa Cruz]], [[Rio de Janeiro]]), [[Brazil]], the only hangar of all those built which still exists (see [[:pt:Hangar do Zeppelin|''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sarah Colonna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jerry Colonna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited South End Rowing Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mission Bay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kendal Calling, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indie and Electro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited World Health Organization ranking of health systems in 2000, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cuban (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Diamond Head, Hawaii may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • of the Hawaiian Islands; because of this, Diamond Head is widely used for commercial purposes (see [[Diamond Head|Diamond Head (disambiguation)]]. Many souvenirs from Hawaii and surf shop logos

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Japanese American internment may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Several U.S. Army internment camps held Japanese, [[Italian-American internment|Italian]] and [[German-American internment|German American] men considered "potentially dangerous." Camp Lordsburg,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube

See also: Template:YouTube
  • As an external link: Nota bene* Sometimes. Videos from "official channels", like the United States' Naval History & Heritage Command, are more likely to be accepted than other links.
  • As a reliable source: Nota bene* Sometimes. If the source would normally be considered reliable (e.g., a segment from a well-known television news show, or an official video channel from a major publisher), then a copy of the source on YouTube is still considered reliable.
  • Common issues:
  1. Videos must be carefully screened for copyright violations (WP:ELNEVER, WP:COPYLINK, WP:YT). The creator of the video must be verifiable as an official channel for the source. Do not link to copyright violations in citations, even if they reproduce information, such as news reports, that might otherwise be considered reliable.
  2. Many readers (especially users on restricted or metered bandwidth, or those behind restrictive corporate or educational firewalls) are unable to view video.
  3. Videos often contain less information than alternative websites or the Wikipedia article itself (ELNO #1).
  4. Videos must be labeled with software requirements (Rich media).
  5. Editors enforce a particularly high standard for links to videos.
  • General comment: Because the Commons and Metawiki have a 100MB limit on files some files are added to YouTube for use in Wikipedia that are gathered from United States government sources such as the National Archives by WikiProject FedFlix or other projects. These files can be used on Wikipedia articles if available.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Infection, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Antiviral and Antifungal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John Leguizamo and IMDb

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to John Leguizamo. See Wikipedia:External_links/Perennial_websites#IMDb - IMDb is NOT an acceptable source for Wiki. If you still want to push the issue take to WP:RSN, or better yet search the archives for the copious discussions about this. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:28, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You well-know by now that IMDb is not an acceptable source for bio info in Wiki - stop it. Find a reliable source. The only reliable reference that can be used is the credits for Ice Age: Continental Drift and Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs had an actor named Lucas Leguizamo in those films. The film itself is a reliable primary source of its own credits. IMDb editors just transcribe credits into articles and may or may not do so reliably. Any link of Lucas Leguizamo being another name for Ryder Lee Leguizamo requires a reference that is NOT IMDb. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:20, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Graham (promoter), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Santana and Gene Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Birria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maguey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chaplin

In answer to your statement that my revert was not justified as it was "bot, not a Good reason for deletion [sic]", please be aware that CC is a featured article and that anything being added needs to be in keeping with the rest of the article in terms of quality. I had no problem with the source, but it was the formatting which left a lot to be desired. Dodgy edits, such as yours, will always be challanged no matter what as it is imperative that we keep CC in great condition. Thanks. Cassiantotalk 10:06, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Open Text Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Opencola (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on S.M.A.R.T.. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Aoidh (talk) 20:34, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Schnecken, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nuts. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alfreda Frances Bikowsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Redacted. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Intersection for the Arts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campo Santo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cruiser bicycle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fairfax and Larkspur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ukraine Is Not a Brothel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ANSA and Topless. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please remember that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Ukraine Is Not a Brothel. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:21, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WFMT, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page My Music. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Stop icon

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Landmark Worldwide, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

  • If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
  • If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
  • If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. Bbb23 (talk) 05:43, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Landmark Worldwide shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 00:13, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Love My Wife, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PRX. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Manjaro Linux shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Ahunt (talk) 21:12, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter

Hi,

We do not link to Twitter or other social media when the subject has an official web site. Those links should be on the subject's website, and if they are not it is because the subject does not want to advertise them to the public. Please see WP:ELPEREN. Please do not keep re-adding the Twitter link to Steve Gibson (computer programmer). Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 18:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if an external link is used as a reference, then it does not also get listed under external links. Thanks. Skyerise (talk) 18:35, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a conflict of interest?

Information icon Hello, Xb2u7Zjzc32. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Steve Gibson (computer programmer), you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 22:29, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Searches as citations

Wikipedia does not allow searches of any site to be used as citations. Citations must be to independent, third-party sources that explicitly state the fact being represented in the article. We do not allow original research, and web and site searches are exactly that, research. Skyerise (talk) 23:22, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page etiquette

Please review WP:USERTALK. It is considered harassment to repeatedly restore a message on another user's talk page. I read your message, it was not deserving of a response. I removed it. Please do not restore it again. Thanks. Skyerise (talk) 22:23, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Information icon This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 16:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sprouse-Reitz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Benedict Canyon, Los Angeles

I am wondering where you got the information that all those "celebrities" have lived in Benedict Canyon. I haven't checked, but are they are all referenced to Reliable souirces? Questioningly, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 02:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thirty Meter Telescope protests

I noticed that you requested full protection [1] and used a news source with the request and said there was "*vandalism by editors, removing signatures". I don't understand. There were no signatures removed from the talk page and I'm about the only one who has edited the page. I am unclear what you are stating.--Mark Miller (talk) 00:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. Alex2006 (talk) 13:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Capicola. Alex2006 (talk) 14:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you don't understand the real meaning of Italian words, but you added twice a blasphemy on the talk page. Next time you will be reported. Alex2006 (talk) 14:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and you have been just reported because of that. Alex2006 (talk) 14:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FBReader

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of FBReader, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.wikipediatldr.com/wiki/FBReader.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:27, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of FBReader

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on FBReader requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.wikipediatldr.com/articles/803568/fbreader. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 01:37, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Reddogsix :

"material copied directly from http://www.wikipediatldr.com/wiki/FBReader"

wikipediatldr.com is material copied directly from wikipedia.org.! FIX CorenSearchBot.!~~ Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk)

Yes, I know. That is why I removed the CSD from the page. You beat me to removing the tag from your page. reddogsix (talk) 01:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
"Warning: Duplication Detector may in some cases give no results or incomplete results. This does not necessarily indicate copying has not occurred. Manually examine the source document to verify."~~ Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk)


~~ Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk)

Wikipedia email re Newspapers.com signup

Hello, Xb2u7Zjzc32. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 12:30, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FBReader for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FBReader is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FBReader until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shii (tock) 09:04, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Xb2u7Zjzc32&oldid=669756503"