User talk:Reaper Eternal
Feel free to reverse my administrative actions; however, please let me know why you did it, especially if I made a mistake! |
Template Editor
Thank you for reviewing my application for being a template editor and for responding. I am here to ask what else can I do to improve and what parts of the guidelines do I need to work on to make myself a template editor. Thank You -- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 16:59, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay, but it is not happening. This is not a game—user rights are not "level ups". They are granted on an as-needed basis. As for what you need to work on, try not searching for user rights for their own sake. Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:21, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- OK Thanks -- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 21:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
different rules for different users
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/TheFuckAddict/Archive
There you said, Checkusers will not connect an IP to an account per the privacy policy. Closing, since everyone is blocked for vandalism anyway. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:09, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Now here a user is blocked for ip editing, and the Ip is even mentioned.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Warwar86
--Cosmic Emperor 03:39, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- Admins blocking accounts and IPs which are blatantly the same person without using checkuser is not a privacy policy violation. Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:22, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
How to edit Block info?
How does someone stop blocking being or looking like it is malicious as in no attempt to avoid harm? No one has attempted a workable strategy, no one has tried comprehensive info on one page designed to troubleshoot. The summary: trigger, blocked, not informed (hello robot), discovered, says no reason (hello robot), link suggest tests; fail to unblock; pages latter: you might be specifically blocked or not (hello robot); not specifically blocked; instruction refers to page no longer/never available with half a code to paste; fumble several guesses; you lift block.
How do you know it was right to lift block?
How so circuitous but never ever challenging the block 'reason', why the secrecy, why dumber than a robotic process would suggest, why lifted with no real evidence?
Why is the core of WP unethical? Because anyone who complains is "shouting on your page"? It is a bully tool/bully removal tool isn't? Otherwise it would be edited into one ordinary page and would have some polish.
This came from Flyer22 and/or the people attacking them, didn't it? All I have seen is complete crap on here, no desire for integrity of information and one talk argument over the meaning of '/' in "HIV/AIDS". Juvenile sandpit stuff. I came here to kraft information and hone editing, not argue on primary school topics where there never was argument.
"You should be able to edit without issues now." No I am finding it impenetrable or someone precious comes along and wants 'their' silly, patently wrong idea left instead.
Look, are there some guided steps for newbies? Some exercises perhaps that follow a recipe rather than needing to read many pages and distil them in your first action. Sorry I don't need to be give a page which turns into a tree of pages but something that pulls it together. I feel I cannot edit without upsetting someone and getting blocked again.
I notice that Drake Bell has apologised for tweeting transphobic comments. His car accident is listed. I think transphobia is more important to his music and its lyrics than the historical car accident that he has recovered from. Now it is settled, time to mention? Remember he may have caused someone's suicide and this is not an unreasonable assumption when the rate of self-harm is so high. 210.84.11.221 (talk) 06:45, 13 June 2015 (UTC) Note today you have reported racism reported against Australian AFL player Goodes which is just another repeat unfortunately from game targetted at him and it is therefore insignificant relative to Bell's transphobia. Test your avoidance of trans by replacing it with one your attributes or race. I suggest you have been transphobic. If he hit a cameraman it would be there. Ericglare (talk) 07:09, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry wasn't even logged in but it felt like I was. I gather this is all public domain then. Ericglare (talk) 06:54, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- What on earth are you trying to write here...? Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:23, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 June 2015
- Arbitration report: An election has consequences
- News and notes: Labs outage kills tools, self; news in brief
- Featured content: Great Dane hits 150
- Discussion report: A quick way of becoming an admin
- WikiProject report: Western Australia speaks – we are back
Fan club
You've got an admirer [1] Acroterion (talk) 22:26, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Parody account
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Reaped_Eternally&action=edit&redlink=1 --Cosmic Emperor 16:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 June 2015
- From the editor: The Signpost tagging initiative
- Featured content: One eye when begun, two when it's done
- Technology report: 2015 MediaWiki architecture focus and Multimedia roadmap announced
- News and notes: Board of Trustees propose bylaw amendments
- Arbitration report: Politics by other means: The American politics 2 arbitration
It looks like this IP is now causing disruption on its own talk page, but I don't think I am allowed to remove or deny the unblock request even though it has 0% chance of being granted. I don't know if you can either since you are the administrator responsible for blocking the IP, but I thought I'd notify you just in case. Dustin (talk) 00:20, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- I rolled back the request and removed the talk page access. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:22, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks! I appreciate the quick response. Dustin (talk) 00:24, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Please block this IP: 82.132.239.251. Thank you. Dustin (talk) 00:35, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
FYI
Reaper, I don't know if you realized that Eric's block was done to enforce an arbitration decision. Unblocking him is grounds for an almost automatic desysop. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:27, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- I suppose you realized. Support unblock in a case that should not even have gone to AE without asking the user if he realized that his edit could be interpreted as a breach of restrictions. FYI: Today's Sunday sermon is about mercy, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:27, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Fyi, I'm adding you (as well as myself) as parties to the current arb case request. Kevin Gorman (talk) 06:43, 28 June 2015 (UTC)