User talk:Nairspecht

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jio Chat (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was:

Previous concerns have not been addressed. While there is an impressive quantity of footnotes from usually reliable sources, the quality of these references is still lacking. They appear to be based on the same press release and provide little coverage of this app. It appears to be too soon for this subject to meet notability guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jio Chat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RadioFan (talk) 16:24, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nairspecht, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! RadioFan (talk) 16:24, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What I have done is more articulated the article, using reports came in reliable and leading sources, that's very common in wikipedia. The existing report in the box office section can't be regarded as a "neutral" source as it is a claim from producer. The Manorama report is odd and it's not adaquate for a neutral verification. That's why we articulated the most relevant reports regarding the subject in a neutral manner.

@Rashghunzraj blazt: Agreed they are reliable sources, but since you say the claim is from a producer, things change. It should come from an official Mollywood box office reporter, and I don't think there is one. So, it would need more sources to add that type of data. Plus, you address yourself as we, why is that? And I suggest you sign your replies, please. Cheers! Nairspecht (talk) 08:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Nairspecht: Pls review the addition once more, they were the facts based on various reports. Commonly subjective claims are not used to be regarded as "neutral" in wikipedia. The manorama report, which seems like subjective, also includes in my addition. Better check it with an administrator.Rashghunzraj blazt (talk) 1 January 2016 (UTC)

@Rashghunzraj blazt: You may start a discussion on the film's talk page and see what others have to say about it. Nairspecht (talk) 08:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]