User talk:Kashmiri: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Maxforwind - "→April 2019: " |
→Burhan Wani: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 165: | Line 165: | ||
I used reliable sources in the page. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Maxforwind|Maxforwind]] ([[User talk:Maxforwind#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Maxforwind|contribs]]) 20:56, 14 April 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
I used reliable sources in the page. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Maxforwind|Maxforwind]] ([[User talk:Maxforwind#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Maxforwind|contribs]]) 20:56, 14 April 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Burhan Wani == |
|||
So you say I'm defaming him? A guy who uses violence against innocent people is a bloody terrorist. He was a terrorist, just like you [[User:Aditya Mishra H1N1|Aditya Mishra H1N1]] ([[User talk:Aditya Mishra H1N1|talk]]) 15:26, 16 April 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:26, 16 April 2019
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words. |
Committed identity: 93e503f09fd69f42d86838f9f8ba05e2af45efbdf563c26448bd87e7979cb42b983bdb36e4121469aca4cfb936318ee9c7745a40aefb1d81504f74edc16f11fe is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.
|
Greetings.
Hello Kashmiri: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, DBigXrayᗙ 15:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message
Hope the new year will bring more friendly debates and collaboration for us.
Thanks for your contributions. I recently found a gem of a performance that you might be amused to look at. Cheers --DBigXrayᗙ 15:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi DBigXray, thanks, and a happy and joyous New Year to you, too! The video is removed, though :( — kashmīrī TALK 17:57, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- User:Kashmiri, Take a look before it gets taken down again. [1]--DBigXrayᗙ 04:03, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Argos 2018.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Argos 2018.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
revert
your correct I had looked at the wrong reference,[2], thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:51, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- No worries :) — kashmīrī TALK 01:11, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Neelam rename/merge
Thought your views may be helpful here. regards. --DBigXrayᗙ 07:56, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Complaint about your edits of Juan Guaidó was filed at WP:AN3
Please see WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kashmiri reported by User:Alcibiades979 (Result: ). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:18, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Juan Guaidó
Hello, I'm Jamez42. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Juan Guaidó that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Jamez42 (talk) 10:47, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
The article Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Source searches in both "Agencja+Oceny+Technologii+Medycznych+i+Taryfikacji" Polish and "Agency+for+Health+Technology+Assessment+and+Tariff+System" English turn up little in the way of significant coverage of the depth required for organisational notability. Being a government agency doesn't guarantee notability, opting for PROD over A7 to allow those more proficient with the Polish language to further analyse.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 13:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Notification
You may wish to notify the person you started an AN thread about. PackMecEng (talk) 00:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- @PackMecEng: It wasn't intended to be about a person, wasn't really an ANI report. Rather, it was discussion starter on COI editing, canvassing, our abilities to detect it, and the damage resulting from allowing or preventing it. I definitely don't want this thread to descend into wrangling over a specific editor. — kashmīrī TALK 00:39, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Please stop vandalising Islamic Pages
Your religious inclination is very much respected as you are a kashmiri pundit.
but that does not give you the right to remove calligraphy from persons pages over and over again from personalities who are Muslims
The calligraphy is there for millions of pages. Pages of Muhammad and All others have this calligraphy.
I have added calligraphy where it was needed.
Stop Vandalising SPQR10 (talk) 02:27, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
- @SPQR10: If your edits are being reverted by a long-standing editor who also explains the rationale of the revert, the least you can do is to accept that or ask for clarification if in doubt. You might like to read WP:BRD. Starting an edit war and accusing the other editor of vandalism will not take you far while accusing them of religious bias constitutes a personal attack. That's not how Wikipedia works. There was a problem with your edits. In two cases you removed actual images of article subjects and replaced them with calligraphy, which did not improve the articles. In the remaining cases you added huge calligraphied names to infoboxes, for no purpose. No, the infobox at Mohammad does not contain a calligraphied name but a photo of an object. — kashmīrī TALK 21:49, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
I will make it clear in points.
1) You are not admin here 2) Rather than removing artistic calligraphy from a page, improve the article.
3) Stop attacking Islam specific pages, become diverse.
4) Pages of Muhammad has a calligraphy, in case you understand arabic, look closely
5) I can't make logic with you as you are not willing to understand
6) How does removing calligraphy from pages improve the article? while it is present in All sorts of articles
eg. Muhammad Abu bakr Umar Usman Ali All the figures
Now make a point or being removing calligraphy from those pages too ,
(Ath wanan met Aab)( English : This is called Chaos)
SPQR10 (talk) 07:20, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- @SPQR10: I have asked you to refrain from personal attacks. If you want to improve Wikipedia, comment on content, not on the contributor. Currently, you are one step from being blocked from editing this collaborative project.
- The pages you listed all contain reproductions of famous works of calligraphy art, as you can read in the captions. On the other hand, what you added was your own creations which in no way improved the articles, instead impacting on the legibility of infoboxes. If you'd like a second opinion feel free to start a discussion at WP:ISLAM. — kashmīrī TALK 11:35, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks i understand my fault now.
SPQR10 (talk) 05:40, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
False Falgging Event in NiT Srinagar
Please stop false flagging events as spam. revert your edits as soon as possible.
My edits are verified. The event http://exordium.co.in/ has an official website. SPQR10 (talk) 07:20, 7 April 2019 (UTC) Stop false roll backing my edits without any reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SPQR10 (talk • contribs) 07:07, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- @SPQR10: Please read WP:NOTNEWS. Wikipedia is not a place to list all events in the world that have a website.
- Please also make sure you add new content at the bottom of Talk pages. — kashmīrī TALK 11:29, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks i understand now
SPQR10 (talk) 05:41, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Derry Girls
Can I suggest you read WP:DERRY or at least watch Derry Girls 82.28.89.159 (talk) 21:05, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks, wasn't aware of this. — kashmīrī TALK 10:25, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Fame at last (name checked)
Fyi, [3] :) ——SerialNumber54129 19:48, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Wow!!! — kashmīrī TALK 20:37, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Congrats SPQR10 (talk) 05:39, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
Why are you deleting posts and articles??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxforwind (talk • contribs) 20:15, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Maxforwind: I did not delete any article, and there are no "posts" on Wikipedia. However, I have been reverting many your edits because they did not comply with Wikipedia policies. Additionally, you continued editing despite warnings from many editors. I suggest you first try to learn what Wikipedia is all about and how to best contribute to it. There is an extensive Help section, I encourage you to take time to read it. It will make editing less frustrating to you and to fellow editors. — kashmīrī TALK 20:20, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Again, I have only one account and it's this one. You deleted the page section. The page where I talked about the scientific miracles in the Quran is on a page called "Quran and miracles". And you removed all of it without any explanation of exactly why. The page is called "Quran and miracles". How is what I wrote not relevant, How is that not relevant to the topic?
- It was your original research whereas Wikipedia does not allow original research. See WP:NOR. Also, you just admitted that it was you who wrote it as an IP editor. — kashmīrī TALK 20:45, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
I used reliable sources in the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxforwind (talk • contribs) 20:56, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Burhan Wani
So you say I'm defaming him? A guy who uses violence against innocent people is a bloody terrorist. He was a terrorist, just like you Aditya Mishra H1N1 (talk) 15:26, 16 April 2019 (UTC)