User talk:95.26.146.215
discuss
I have responded to your comment on my talk page. Please respond there. Murray Langton (talk) 06:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
January 2024
Hi and welcome to Wikipedia. I reverted your edits to Arbitrary-precision arithmetic and IEEE 754 because they violated Wikipedia's style guidelines and were confusing to me, and your edit summary of "Deny recognition" was nonsensical. If you want to see these changes restored, please desist from Wikipedia:Edit warring, and take your specific concerns/criticisms to the articles' talk pages. Wikipedia collaboration depends on collegial discussion and consensus, and if you try to brute-force your way through and force your will on it, you will have an unpleasant time and will generally be unsuccessful. –jacobolus (t) 08:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- You're removing content without proper reason. 95.26.146.215 (talk) 08:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- You took out various comprehensible text and replaced it with confusing text in an unencyclopedic style, without sources, under a very confusing edit summary. Again, you may have well-founded concerns about the current articles' text, but please take it to the talk page and try to explain your point of view and build consensus, instead of edit warring. –jacobolus (t) 08:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- My text is fine and can't fix unencyclopedic nonsense yourself.
- I don't care about style. I care about facts. 95.26.146.215 (talk) 08:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- If you care about "facts", you should explain yourself clearly at the relevant talk pages. If you have a valid point and can convince anyone else of that, someone else can fix up whatever style issues (lack of sources, un-encyclopedic prose, disrupting the narrative flow of the article by putting sentences in a confusing place, etc.). Right now, I don't at all understand what point you were trying to prove with your edits. –jacobolus (t) 08:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think you can fix it. You're wasting my time. 95.26.146.215 (talk) 08:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- If you care about "facts", you should explain yourself clearly at the relevant talk pages. If you have a valid point and can convince anyone else of that, someone else can fix up whatever style issues (lack of sources, un-encyclopedic prose, disrupting the narrative flow of the article by putting sentences in a confusing place, etc.). Right now, I don't at all understand what point you were trying to prove with your edits. –jacobolus (t) 08:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- You took out various comprehensible text and replaced it with confusing text in an unencyclopedic style, without sources, under a very confusing edit summary. Again, you may have well-founded concerns about the current articles' text, but please take it to the talk page and try to explain your point of view and build consensus, instead of edit warring. –jacobolus (t) 08:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |