Talk:Religion in Japan
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Religion in Japan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Japan: Culture / History / Law & government / Ainu / Ryukyu C‑class Top‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Religion C‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Page views for this article over the last 30 days | ||
---|---|---|
Detailed traffic statistics |
Removal of info on State Shinto
[[ping|Shii}} Please explain what you mean by "factual corrections", as all I see is that you deleted important informtion. See Helen Hardacre's book on the subject, for example.--Ubikwit 連絡 見学/迷惑 19:47, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- Your ping didn't work... anyway see the State Shinto article for more info. Shii (tock) 22:02, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Non Folk Shinto Atheists/Plain Atheism in Japan/Non-Magical Thinkers
Not all Atheists pray for their ancestors. Plain atheists do respect, but not pray via magical thinking. Some Japanese are plain atheists. Some plain[non Shinto] atheists may attend a ceremony or a festival because of respect, not because they are "Shinto atheists". Plain atheists belong to a different notion. Many times in Japan we are forced not in a direct manner to respect other religions. We are a modern nation and many Japanese people follow the scientific method in their lives. To respect the "plain atheists" in Japan is a fundamental right in a civilised country. By respecting "plain atheism" and the scientific reasoning-method there is no danger or disrespect against Shinto religion. Most "Plain atheists" do not accept the term "a-theist" because it means non deist, therefore has a negative meaning. Explicit atheists use the therm "non-magical thinkers", that phrase has also a negative meaning, but by supporting rationalism, and not via the denial of deities. It is also called "negative meaning in a positive manner" because it supports atheistic reasoning, and it is not [that phrase] based against something that others believe [for magical thinking is a rational analysis]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.84.219.128 (talk) 01:19, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Year in article
The following section comes from the Christianity paragraph: " Portuguese traders were already active in Kagoshima since 1943,[53] welcomed by local daimyo because they imported gunpowder. Anijirō, a Japanese convert, helped the Jesuits understanding Japanese culture and translating the first Japanese catechism.[54]
These missionaries were successful in converting large numbers of people in Kyushu, including paesants, former Buddhist monks, and members of the warrior class.[55] In 1559, a mission to the capital, Kyoto, was started.[56] By the following year there were already nine churches, and the Christian community grew steadily in the 1560s"
So should the 1943 be changed to 1493? - Bramvr (talk) 09:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Religion in Japan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100611060608/http://mnnonline.org/article/10318 to http://mnnonline.org/article/10318
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:16, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Request change, source 1 census is listed as being in 2006, but there is reason to believe it is in 2000
I do not speak Japanese, so forgive me if I am wrong, but I noticed that the pie chart's date seems to be wrong. I journied over to the source, because I wanted to see it for myself for a paper I'm working on, and I noticed that there is a contradiction. The top of the census says: "2000年," and at the very bottom of the page, however, it says "Added... 2006." I could be mistaken, but to the best I could tell, the census is from 2000, but the person added the information was uploaded to the source by a third party in the year of 2006. Forgive me if I am wrong.
MrRichBOB (talk) 05:08, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Problem with the kami
The kami are not the one centralized god-creator of the Universe, neither their personhood is as partonizing as for example the Abrahamic god.
(personhood is important to mention here, because personhood is about the definition of the person; not personality which focuses mainly on the particularities of the individual - we should study deeple the "personhood of kami" or the "degree of personhood" but degree of personhood is a different subject) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:410C:8900:D48A:A93:3E21:696F (talk) 22:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Thus many Japanese who are irreligious don't have enough motivation to be declared antispiritualists.
We have to mention that.
Some (but not all) Japanese are conceited. They focus on the blurriness of some Shinto texts, on the fact that kami is not the one universal creator, and on the fact that kami aren't as partonizing as the Islamic, Christian or other gods.
This isn't a metalogically deep reason to avoid strong atheism if your reasoning leads you there.
The Japanese don't show proper respect to pure nothingness and stict antimathematicality/antispirituality.
Not all Japanese have a single opinion. Few are true atheists.
As a society they don't show respect towards pure nothingness and pure atheism.
That's a problem of their own.
They should stop blaming the non patronizing weakness and non universal centrality of the kami.
Respecting something doesn't mean you have to agree.
They (as a society) don't show respect towards pure nothingness and pure atheism.
Not all Japanese are male, old or artists. Many different characters exist.
We shouldn't blame individuals, instead the Japanese society.
- don't delete that; it's a subtle social problem (it will be solved, because new immigrants aren't inhabited in conduct and speak out their minds) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:410C:8900:D48A:A93:3E21:696F (talk) 22:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Japanese Buddhism
I would like to eventually explain Pure land Buddhism is different from JodoShu(Pure land Buddhism is called Jodo-Kyo here in Japan),When I find an English source.(I know an American Buddhist who believes pure land Buddhism,who's texts are not availableHard to find unlike common Buddhism text in Japan)Give me some time until I find them.Paperworkorange (talk) 15:48, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Inconsistent Figures
The figures showing the breakdown of religious practice in Japan flatly contradict each other. The NHK data seems to be at odds with the other sources stated at the top. If it's an outlier it should but be placed so prominently or, if not, they're should at least be an mention of the divergence of the graphs in their captions. 24.185.137.174 (talk) 00:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- It depends on what the original NHK source says. The CIA factbook source which is unknown allowed people to identify more than one religion (which goes with Japanese society allowing the possibility of following both Shinto and Buddhist practices). The NHK source is in Japanese so I can't read it but does not seem to allow overlap (or else the person creating the pie chart chose data to fit a pre-conceived notion that a person could only be one religion at a given time). Given the overlap existing, the pie chart should go even though on the whole I prefer to avoid the CIA Factbook data because it does not list its sources. Erp (talk) 16:06, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Data outdated
The data for the percentages of adherents of different faiths is outdated Stormplatter (talk) 05:45, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Ucsp about beliefs in japan.
Beliefs in Japan 175.176.77.169 (talk) 07:34, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Percentage in Japanese religion Pie chart
Hello, can you please fix the pie chart of the percentage of shinto its percentage is more higher than 3%. Can you help fix it to its proper percentage please ok. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.150.13.206 (talk) 01:53, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Inaccurate Graphic
The pie chart at the start of the article seems wildly inaccurate - it shows the percentage of people practising Shinto as 3%..? ElleBlair (talk) 21:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps this is 3% membership in Shinto organizations.JimRenge (talk) 21:51, 1 August 2023 (UTC)