Jump to content

Talk:Dalas Review

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Discospinster (talk | contribs) at 02:37, 24 October 2024 (Reverted edits by Pepito2798 (talk) to last version by Bby.Nizz). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Semi-protection

[edit]

I personally believe that someone should semi-protect this page to avoid vandalism by anonymous users.--Germanico5468504 (talk) 23:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Germanico5468504: you can request page protection at WP:RPP, or use a tool like Twinkle or RedWarn to also request protection. Liamyangll (talk to me! | My contribs!) 23:04, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This page was recently put up for speedy deletion. According to the guidelines we have (WP:NOTCSD #14), articles should not be speedily deleted just because the subject wants them deleted - being the subject of an article does not grant them extra rights to do what they want to the page. If the subject of an article wants the page deleted, they can start an AFD. Referring to WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE, only if there is no rough consensus, the page may be deleted after discussion. Although, I do understand the concerns regarding the controversies. Instead of putting the page up for deletion (which is normally a last resort according to WP:BLPDELETE), maybe discuss the specific issues here on the talk page instead. Liamyangll (talk to me! | My contribs!) 23:25, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, the article does not contain any defamation to be deleted.--Germanico5468504 (talk) 00:11, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dalas is anti-communist

[edit]

Dalas them criticism of communism and its adherents on several occasions, so I'm going to put it in the category of "Spanish anti-communists":

Vandalism

[edit]

Hello, I delete the insults to the streamer and I write the information again 83.57.20.209 (talk) 02:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@83.57.20.209: Thanks for your work, I just removed some that were left. ItsMario97 (talk) 02:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The whole information here is an insult to him Bby.Nizz (talk) 02:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Writing and sources

[edit]

Hello, good morning. I fixed some grammatical errors, improved the tone on some parts and replaced some poor sources and mildly inaccurate information. FoxxKirjat (talk) 10:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs for this article:
Dalas_Review (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deletion request: Page dedicated to harassment, violates EU laws, spreading misinformation, violates Wikipedia ToS DalasREAL (talk) 16:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC) ==[reply]

AfDs for this article:
Dalas_Review (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deletion request: Page dedicated to harassment, violates EU laws, spreading misinformation, violates Wikipedia ToS DalasREAL (talk) 16:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs for this article:
DalasReview (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Why the page should be deleted DalasREAL (talk) 16:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry If I put the title or tags wrong, first time doing this. Hello. This is the real Dalas Review and I can prove it if any administrator wants to reach me out in my email address linked to this account. Long time ago I requested the removal of this page from Wikipedia as it consists of mainly defamation and violation of European Laws such as "derecho al olvido" and explicit defamation mixing up information and presenting it with very deformed words to make it look as I'm guilty still instead of having been acquitted by 3 judges and won every single criminal case against me and won every single one against others. I don't look forward to try to discuss every single detail on every single topic, because there's a whole lot of information that would take me literally too much of my time, and I've already done that several times throughout this 8-year legal nightmare that ensued against me. Just to put some examples, the editors of this page have managed to twist words in a way where they present misleading information on purpose on the trial I had to endure the year 2018, saying that "I got free because of the lack of proofs against me", when the reality is that those "proofs" are the actual testimonies from the people who were filling that criminal case, some of them actually were banned from the trial for their bad behavior, they were caught in group conversations leaked by one of the parties involved talking about how to lie to the police and not a single drop of proof of any kind was presented, and even worse, I brought to the case more proof that I couldn't have done such a thing because I was in another place at that time. I'm not willing to go to every single discussion of this topic because this is an ongoing topic that the abusers (like the ones who wrote this horribly written page) always try to get by disinforming people and people do not want to view hour-long videos showing actual court papers who prove I'm not any of those things, they just come here and edit the wikipedia Page as they wish. Funny thing is that my wikipedia page is even longer than other way more famous and important people in the planet; And I'm not even that important, just a YouTuber with some crazy people overly obsessed with me. I've red all the articles required for deletion, and this page does not only violate EU laws, but it also falls under the Wikipedia ToS where a page is dedicated for harassment. I don't care that some editors are saying "there's no defamation here", you're no lawyer, you know nothing about my life, and you purposedly mix up information and use specific wording choices to make it look as I'm guilty although I'm not. I would gladly discuss this with an actual neutral moderator who would be willing to permanently close the page for editing and allow me to write it myself with all backing proofs and court documents I do have, but I will not discuss this matter with people clearly dedicated to my harassment and spread of misinformation which have been the subject of this 3-year long prosecution on Wikipedia. It's pointless and I take nothing of value from that, like that "Germanico" user which is really laughable saying that "this is not defamation", which it clearly is. It's been almost 3 years since I requested the deletion of this page and moderators have been ignoring such request. I will be filling a lawsuit against Wikipedia because this page is clearly an abusive page and dedicated only to harassment towards me. Thank you for reading this text. DalasREAL (talk) 16:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check the WP:GD to do the nomination. Librero2109 (talk) 18:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How? I don't know how to do it! Help! DalasREAL (talk) 20:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Check Wikipedia:HOWTODELETE. Librero2109 (talk) 22:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns about article

[edit]

This page is not neutral and the information given here is wrong, the subject has even changed his name and his face, so the name starting with Daniel is no longer his name the subject has been trying to either delete it because the information is not matching reality it has many sensationalist opinions from the press in the wrong timing, you can find the actual status of the false accusations that have been made in the paste and their resolutions in official websites and other sources he is willing to provide with his ID for the name and give you some pictures. Also a lot of junk information there are many positive things to inform about the subject and none of them are being mentioned please do your research again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bby.Nizz (talkcontribs) 13:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If he has changed his name and face there should be some reliable secondary source that talks about it (we can't just use his ID to confirm because it has to be available to everyone reading the article). If there is a secondary source, it could be added to the article. The same goes for the claim that his legal issues have been resolved, or whatever positive things you think should be there. As for the photo, if it's from his Instagram account then we need permission to use it in Wikipedia. ... discospinster talk 19:35, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If we can't use his ID to confirm the actual name, what source do you think is best for it? And well I have his permission but how do I prove that? (For every information needed or pictures, as the instagram one ) Or do I need to ask him to take a new picture? About the legal issue that have been resolved I will do my own research in order to make sure that the information is the most accurate and neutral in order to ensure the subject's wiki page is not banned by gossip and harassment against him. Also this is supposed to be about a YouTuber but seems like the YouTube link doesn't even works is the data on that even accurate? Thank you discospinster for your support in this matter as anyone else has given me an answer about it. Bby.Nizz (talk) 00:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Help please Bby.Nizz (talk) 23:48, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the best option would be to ask your question at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. There are people there who are more familiar with the policy. ... discospinster talk 15:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you already Bby.Nizz (talk) 00:15, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Child grooming allegations and so

[edit]

The third one of the external links you have posted (the following one) if you go to the page 19 and if you know Spanish or you translated it on google you will realize that he was "absolved" which means the accusations were wrong so why to include this I mean if you include it that's all right that did happened but also you should mention the ending 😉

https://ep00.epimg.net/descargables/2018/12/17/1c67624ac103bbb10a3bb2b2c1bef47d.pdf

Bby.Nizz (talk) 00:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Could you check the first reference please Bby.Nizz (talk) 17:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]