Jump to content

Talk:Alexandria

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zm14 (talk | contribs) at 13:58, 20 July 2008 (No Mention of Cleopatra?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Material from the 1911 article

This page needs some drastic updating by someone familiar with the modern city. I'm moving some of the more dated material from the 1911 article here, for reference; some of it may be suitable for working back in, but I'm willing to bet that much no longer applies. Catherine

City

Alien city

This sounds like it should be "more detached from Rome", but I'm not sure. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CatherineMunro (talkcontribs).
What is meant here is that Alexandria remained in many ways a Graeco-Roman city, part of the classical European cultural sphere, while the surrounding country turned somewhat away from it, so that Alexandria became something of a foreign entity in its own country. --Santetjan 9 July 2005 18:40 (UTC)

Regarding the Library of Alexandria

The story of Abulfaragius

I have added this section and also kept previous one.

The famous Library of Alexandria had been destroyed much earlier - in 3rd century during a civil war in the time of the Roman Emperor Aurelian. The myth that the Arabs destroyed it was a lie invented by 13th century Christian propagandists. Source: [Sword of Prophet, writer: Robert Goldston, Pg 56, The Dial Press New York, 1979] --Itsalif 21:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arabic not native

Arabic isn't the native language of Egypt; the sentence comparing it with (among others) Greek is highly misleading, since Greek has been spoken there for far longer than Arabic. Coptic is actually the language with the best claim to be "native" (it evolved from ancient Egyptian languages), but even that is as wrong as saying that English is the native language of the Anglo-Saxons. But I can't really think of a better phrase. "Arabic is the dominant language" perhaps? "majority language"? Suggestions please. PML. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.16.172.8 (talkcontribs).

Arabic is both the official language and the language spoken by the indigenous (i.e. Egyptian) population. It is put next to Greek, amongst others, as Greek is spoken by a number of foreigners (and maybe some clergymen?), not by the Egypt-born population, give or take a few exceptions. To say that Arabic is Egypt's native language nowadays is like saying that English is Britain's native language, which is true unless the concept of of 'native' is stretched to its limits. --Santetjan 9 July 2005 18:36 (UTC)

Some things to think about

History to present day.

Think the Egyptian Revolution, Suez Crisis (i.e. when did the British leave?)

Dunc_Harris| 11:19, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

The British Occupation

The entry narrating the justification of the British invasion is biased and rather vague on the details. Either do not attempt to justify anything in this entry or narrate it in more depth. In its current form it is unsatisfactory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karmish (talkcontribs)

OtherUses template

Please change the article to use Template:OtherUses instead of Template:otheruses it currently uses. The OtherUses template has information about the contents of the article.

{{OtherUses|info=information about the contents of the article}}

For a sample use of this template refer to the articles Alabama or Algiers--—The preceding unsigned comment was added by DuKot (talkcontribs) .

Note that that functionality is now at {{otheruses1}}. {{OtherUses}} redirects to {{otheruses}}, and is deprecated.--Srleffler 18:41, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

American English

Can we please, wherever possible, try and avoid Americanisms which always give English prose such a vulgar, uneducated flavour. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.252.250 (talkcontribs)

While you may well have a point, such a sweeping and critical remark should come with some examples. Also, Americans are not all vulgar and uneducated and we do not have a monopoly on such perspectives; I've seen "The Benny Hill Show". Cranston Lamont 21:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tarek El Hadidi

One of the most significant characters of todays modern 'Alexandrians' is Tarek El Hadidi, a half German business man with many talents and dreams. Having travelled and lived all around the world during his still young years (born 1973), El Hadidi says he is determined to give Alexandria back what it used to be: the pearl of the mediteranian and the most important city in the middle east and Egypt: the cradle of civilisation. "It is about giving the world the chance to witness (or even live) a city where so much has happened which changed the worlds order and lasted for thousands of years until our present time. This citys real ancient influence on the modern world, is still unknown to most people and even Scientists crave to discover its secrets: Finding Alexander the greats tomb for example, just to give you an idea. It's the connection of antiquity with todays life which makes Alexandria a must have in todays search of whatever mankind dreams to achieve: Romance, power, fortune, adventure, life style, traditions just to name a few." He says Alexandria is seeing a total eclipse of which one side is already visible to the international public but the other is not. It is this invisble rebirth into modern times in many fields El Hadidi says, which is the most exciting and he claims to be capable of showing only who he calls 'the willing' what is meant by it. Secrets are there to be kept, he ads. Interviewed by M. Feuerherdt, November 2005. [email protected], no copyright. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.47.127.225 (talkcontribs)

PLEASE READ AND UPDATE ALEXANDRIA ARTICLE

99 times out of 100 I am satisfied if not impressed with the compreheniveness and level of detail in Wikipedia and it's 1,000,000 articles in general. That is what made this article all the more shocking to me. I am not really very good at creating or ediing articles, but I had to make what I considered to be a much needed (emergency) addition to the article. There was basically no information on the modern city in the article which is quite frankly egregious for a city of Alexandrias prominence and renown. It is after all Egypt's second city with well over three million people, not some desert backwater. I hope someone reads my appeal to add an entire section dealing with todays Alexandria as my modifications were barebones according to my skill at editing articles PLEASE READ THIS AND UPDATE!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.146.173.207 (talkcontribs)

I was looking forward to read about this great city, but found the article to short. Some locals should write here, and tell us more about Alexandria. It's quite fascinating to think about how this city developed, from ancient towards modern time, and how buildings where built on top of old buildings and ruins through the time. Ironicaly Alexandria had the greatest libary ever, which disappeared in the 600's. Ships from all over the world entered the harbour, and they had to give away all the books that was on the ship. They got a copy back, and the original books stayed in the libary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.203.8.61 (talkcontribs)

Modern Alexandria

Great for the history of Alexandria, but could use more information on what the city is like today. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poiubvcx888 (talkcontribs)

Not only today, but something about the great changes that have come over it in the past century. Cranston Lamont 21:55, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Start Talking about Modern Alexandria

Obviously most of the readers of Alexandria's article have noticed a shortage of information about modern Alexandria. Introducing myself as an Alexandrian, I shall start a new section under the title of Modern Alexandria, but actually I'm not good at writing and editing articles. So I shall post some images that may be stimulating for some wikipedians to start writing about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheEgyptian (talkcontribs)

Theatre vs. Amphitheatre

I went ahead and changed the tag on the theatre image. A Roman amphitheatre is fully round. The theatre in the picture is clearly semi-circular, and therefore a regular theatre. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pyzmark (talkcontribs) 00:40, 11 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I just reverted the edit, as I found it's the name used commonly in Egypt for it.--TheEgyptian 23:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay fine. It makes perfect sense, since the article deals with modern Alexandria as well. However, and I think this is an acceptable compromise between historical accuracy and modern usage, I felt it necessary to add parentheses to the caption. It won't do to go misleading people on a Wikipedia article - it really is what Wikipedia is trying to avoid these days. Pyzmark 15:07, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The section about the neighbourhood

Looks like a list. I suggest writing a paragraph, talking about the famous neighbourhoods, and giving a link to the whole list.--TheEgyptian 22:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AlexFlag.gif

Image:AlexFlag.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Five races of Alexandria?

The 6th paragraph in Durrell's Justine begins: "Five races, five languages, a dozen creeds: five fleets turning through their greasy reflections behind the harbour bar." The dozen creeds aside does anyone know whether Durrell was referring to five races and five languages on purpose or did he just draw a number from the air to represent Alexandria's diversity? Perhaps the five fleets have a historic basis? If anyone can clear this up I'd be much obliged. Ahassan05 15:48, 16 June 2007 (UTC)ahassan05[reply]

Number of foreigners

How many foreigners were there living in Alexandria before the 1960s? Does anyone know? And how they broke down into Italians, Greeks, Armenians...? Ahassan05 17:01, 16 June 2007 (UTC)ahassan05[reply]

Alexandrian "Accent"

The section on dialectical differences between the speech of Cairo and that of Alexandria needs to be re-written to follow the norms of the English language. It might also be better to just move it to a new article such as "Alexandrian Arabic" or to the existing article on Egyptian Arabic. -- Slacker 06:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandria Language School (ALS)

I've added the school to the Educational Institutions, it is a widely known private school and I am one of its graduates. Its website is http://www.als-eg.net . nÅnNü 18:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roman annexation

Sorry - new to this so unfamiliar with editing. However noticed that the section Roman Annexation includes the following:

"Julius Caesar dallied with Cleopatra in Alexandria in 47 BC, saw Alexander's body (quipping 'I came to see a king, not a collection of corpses' when he was offered a view of the other royal burials) and was mobbed by the rabble."

This quote was not Caesar but Octavian - atributed by both Suetonius (Augustus 18) and Dio Cassius.

Would have to agree with many other comments on this page that this article is in need of a sponsor. I think it would also be sensible to split into two separates articles on ancient and modern Alexandria. Just my view... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomsants (talkcontribs) 21:17, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

29-Oct-2007: In October, I enlarged gallery images in several articles, by using wikitables. Images become large enough to see trees or window areas, while expanding Internet data transfer only 60% (about 2 seconds longer @dial-up speed for 3 images):

 {| class=prettytable "width:380px;"
 |-
 |<!--Col1-->[[Image:Alexandria 2123021.jpg|299x120px]]
 |<!--Col2--> [[Image:Alexandria 2123028.jpg|299x120px]]
 |<!--Col3--><center>[[Image:Alexandr*2123097.jpg|299x120px]]</center>
 |-
 |<!--Col1-->Alexandria beach
 |<!--Col2-->[[Citadel of Qaitbay]]
 |<!--Col3-->[[Saad Zaghloul]] street in downtown Alexandria
 |}
 

The above 3-column wikitable formats as below:

 
Alexandria beach Citadel of Qaitbay Saad Zaghloul street in downtown Alexandria

Such wikitables stay within the right margin, on 800x600 screens. Column-comments ("-Col2-") help match the captions. I don't know why the "<gallery>" tag generates such tiny images (87px high), but at least the tiny images ("blur-boxes") always appear centered in their boxes, too tiny to upset the artistic balance of a page. With wikitables, some narrow images should be hand-centered (with leading non-breaks "&nbsp;&nbsp;" or "<center>"), to avoid crowding left-side of image cells. Larger images can be shown as 2-column tables: remember that in larger images, even a 5% further enlargement might clarify details: turning a blurred wall into a stone-work pattern. Often 270px-width is enough to reveal many details, for 2 images side-by-side. Anyway, wikitables help avoid the "blur-boxes" of the "<gallery>" tag, with minimal overhead. -Wikid77 14:09, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flag

The city flag is incorrect, I wasn't able to find a correct picture on the internet, please remove or help change, thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.205.229.220 (talk) 22:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The flag was correct!! Please, can some one upload the flag again? Mcwaly (talk) 00:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The flag was totally incorrect trust me, I am an Alexandrian Yosef1987 (talk) 13:57, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No Mention of Cleopatra?

I could argue that the single most famous, most important Alexandrian was the Queen of Egypt, Cleopatra VII Thea Philopater of the Ptolemaic Dynasty. This woman was one of the most famous and fascinating women of all time: plays were written about her - including ones by William Shakespeare and George Bernard Shaw; she was celebrated in numerous books, operas, masterpieces of painting and sculpture, poems, motion pictures, etc. Is not Cleopatra a world icon? Am I wrong in supposing that the Alexandrians have an affection for the legendary Queen as much as Amsterdamers have for Rembrandt Van Rijn or Philadelphians have for Benjamin Franklin? Alexandria is the backdrop of politics, ambition, romance and intrigue during the years of Julius Ceasar, Cleopatra, Mark Antony, and Octavius (later, Augustus)Ceasar. Is there a meaningful way this can be reflected or at least referenced in the article? Buddmar (talk) 03:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC)buddmar[reply]