Talk:Ae Dil Hai Mushkil
Film: Indian Start‑class | |||||||||||||
|
India: Cinema Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Stars of the film
Saif Ali Khan is NOT replacing Fawad Khan in this film. This was a baseless rumor that has already been cleared. Please STOP being bigots and appreciate art and cinema. Again, according to media sources, Fawad Afzal Khan is playing the role of Ali in this film and Saif Ali Khan or any other star is NOT replacing him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.138.22.74 (talk) 18:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Fawad Kahn is not starring in the film, he is just in a special appearance role, only Bachchan, Kapoor and Sharma are the lead stars of the film. The infobox should have only the leading stars of the film. Barthateslisa (talk) 09:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- This looks fixed. Best, Nairspecht (talk) (work) 12:59, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- No Fawad Khan is starring in the film. He is not just a cameo. After Bachan, Kapoor and Sharma. He is the most important character. The trailer also reveal the same. Tupur16 (talk) 14:43, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Even I share a link about it. He is supporting lead of the movie not just a special appearance. Tupur16 (talk) 14:45, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- That is your POV, in the trailer and on the poster only three actors are named, Kapoor, Bachchan and Sharma, not Khan. Plus he is a junior actor in terms of seniority in Bollywood. The source you provided is a gossip column, not an announcement from the production. Barthateslisa (talk) 15:24, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Okay agree with youBarthateslisa (talk) 15:24, 24 September 2016 (UTC). But you also have to agree that he is playing much more important role then Lisa and Deepti and please look at the trailer carefully.After Sharma,Kapoor And Bachan is anyone mentioned in the trailer it is Fawad Khan. Here is the prove. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_PODraXg4E — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tupur16 (talk • contribs)
- Again, its your POV, Wikipedia doesn't work on POVs. He is a junior actor, is in a minor role in the film, a special appearance not at all a leading role. Hence below others on the list. Barthateslisa (talk) 16:56, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
I cannot find any solution for casting in WP:MOSFILM, but I am sure that we should stick to the film's billing. Since the film has a website, we should stick to the information contained there. As per the site's "Cast and Crew" section, Kapoor, Bachchan, and Sharma are playing the lead roles. After these actors, the director and the music producer are listed, only after which Khan is mentioned. However, if you notice, the site isn't updated frequently. But, if we go by this site (and I think we should), we can list Fawad Khan after the three aforementioned actors under the "Cast" section, despite him being a junior actor. That should in now way influence his listing. However, let's not add him in the infobox, as "starring" credits are different from "appearing" credits. So, can we reach a swift consensus on this? Best, Nairspecht (talk) (work) 07:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Khan is a junior actor, barely two movies old, and by most reports, he is in a minor or special role in the film. I think we should leave the order of the list as it is and should wait for further disclosure by production. The list even in current shape is fulfilling the task of letting the readers know who all are appearing in the movie. Sharma, Kapoor and Bachchan are the 3 lead hence should be the only one in the info box. The list according to me is in a satisfying shape as of now, we can further wait for the release. Barthateslisa (talk) 10:42, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- I'll also suggest that we wait for more people to join this discussion. Apart from that, I do not think that an actor's history of films should affect the cast listing. Best, Nairspecht (talk) (work) 10:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
English translation
Folks, any help on the literal translation (with or without sources) of the title would be appreciated. Best, Nairspecht (talk) (work) 13:00, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Controversy section
I noticed that there was an attempt to add a "controversy" section, and that was removed later. There are news articles like this, and I feel a short section can be added. --Tito Dutta (talk) 10:30, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Doing it. Nairspecht (talk) 08:28, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class Indian cinema articles
- Indian cinema task force articles
- Indian cinema articles needing an image
- Film articles needing an image
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Low-importance
- Low-importance Indian cinema articles
- Start-Class Indian cinema articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Indian cinema articles
- WikiProject India articles