Wikipedia talk:Dick
Latest comment: 6 years ago by L.R. Wormwood in topic Deletion?
 | This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 14 January 2012. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Offensive
editThis page is offensive and crude. It does not belong in an encylopedia. Rlsheehan (talk) 17:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you find it offensive. However, it's an established (soft) redirect with many incoming links. If you wish to pursue its deletion, the place to take it is Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. But please don't blank it again. Thanks. – The Parting Glass 00:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Dick violates policy. WP:CIVIL prohibits name calling and profanity (WP:PROFANE) such as this. WP:NPA prohibits personal attacks such as this. WP:TONE calls for material suitable for an encyclopedia. WP:NOTCENSORED allows objectionable material ONLY when it is related to the content of the article: it is not needed and is not relavent. It is a Shock Site which does not belong in Wikipedia. Please delete. Rlsheehan (talk) 02:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- I kinda agree with Rlsheehan. I have afded.Tom Pippens (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Dick violates policy. WP:CIVIL prohibits name calling and profanity (WP:PROFANE) such as this. WP:NPA prohibits personal attacks such as this. WP:TONE calls for material suitable for an encyclopedia. WP:NOTCENSORED allows objectionable material ONLY when it is related to the content of the article: it is not needed and is not relavent. It is a Shock Site which does not belong in Wikipedia. Please delete. Rlsheehan (talk) 02:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Deletion?
editThe only purpose this page serves is to allow editors to insult one another on talk pages without being sanctioned according to the WP:CIVILITY and WP:PA policies. If people want to cite the "don't be a jerk" essay, they should use WP:JERK. L.R. Wormwood (talk) 22:38, 2 February 2018 (UTC)