Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 March 28
March 28
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete, CSD G2. Picaroon 00:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
The template is a guide to reaching a minor place in a video game. Wikipedia is not a game guide. Template is also unused, as far as I know. —M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 21:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, as nominator. —M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 21:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, unused, and if it was use it shouldn't be a template anyway. [Mαc Δαvιs] (How's my driving?) ❖ 21:45, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above. BD2412 T 22:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, the template shouldn't have been created in the first place. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 00:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was deleted by Theresa knott (talk · contribs). GracenotesT § 22:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
More nonsense from the creator of [1] and [2]. I warned him on his talk page about removing the header from the talk page and he created a series of templates warning people it's vandalism. It's considered bad form but it's not vandalism. Co-nominating Template:DelSandheader2, Template:DelSandheader3, and Template:DelSandheader4. — Nardman1 21:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. Vassyana 04:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Uganda related topics are too numerous to warrant this template. What is the criteria for adding some articles, and omitting others? Importance? Who decides? Seems too subjective. — Ezeu 04:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Strong keep: I don't visit TfDs much, but since when was subjectivity a reason to delete a template I started? The categories it covers look fine to me. [Mαc Δαvιs] (How's my driving?) ❖ 04:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Redundancy and subjectivity is reason enough. --Ezeu 04:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Strong keep per Template:Falkland Islands topics, Template:Brazil topics, Template:Gibraltar topics, Template:Libya topics, Template:Sudan topics, etc. As with everything in Wikipedia, editors decide on content by consensus. I find the nominator's arguments completely lacking. — Reinyday, 17:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep template, since it's like {{New York City}}, but only if we remove the "people" section, since that's not a "General topic", and the most notable people relating to Uganda should be listed in {{UgandaPresidents}}. Others may not need a nav template. GracenotesT § 20:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- I think we should merge {{UgandaPresidents}} with {{Uganda topics}}. [Mαc Δαvιs] (How's my driving?) ❖ 21:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete (was a cross-space redirect with random characters thereafter) Orderinchaos78 10:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Pure nonsense. -- Richard D. LeCour (talk/contribs) 07:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.