Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Philanthropist 1001/Archive


Philanthropist 1001

Philanthropist 1001 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
09 September 2014
edit
Suspected sockpuppets


User:Talal.talal1 was blocked several days ago for sockpuppeteering. Now this user has sprung up doing the same edits to the same article. Callsfortruth (talk) 08:50, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • User:Lebanesetruth has been blocked (the sockpuppeteer wasn't for some strange reason known to the blocking admin and the sockpuppeteer/PR firm employee). Now he is also editing using User:Philanthropist 1001.
Comments by other users
edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

the user above mentioned my account as a sockpuppet, just checking his history and contribution page will show exactly the amount of confrontations he had with admins over one article he's trying to vandalise in a way contradicting with Wikipedia's BLP rules

thank you talal.talal1 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 11:04, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As Painting101 (talk · contribs) showed up this morning and within 2 hours was autoconfirmed and targeting the same article, he is either a sock or a meatpuppet. Hm, supposedly it takes 4 days and 10 edits to edit a semi-protected article, but he did it in less than 2 hours. Dougweller (talk) 14:01, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
edit

26 August 2014
edit
Suspected sockpuppets

User has been making the same edits. When Rahda1986 was blocked for edit warring, Elie218 popped up hours later and removed the same two sourced sections. These edits are consistent with edits done previously, probably as part of an effort by marketing/PR agency and party members to delete mentions of corruption on warlord's page ahead of upcoming parliamentary elections. The users mentioned above, among other users, seem to focus exclusively on one article, Nabih Berri. Callsfortruth (talk) 12:53, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
edit

13 September 2014
edit
Suspected sockpuppets


The behaviour of this account has strong similarities with Painting101 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki). Registration before their first edit (1 day for Rami2587, 4 for Painting101), and a rush to get autoconfirmed by making minor edits, followed by edits at Nabih Berri. The difference is that Nabih Berri is currently fully protected, so Rami2587 settled for editing the talk page, presumably after they worked out that becoming autoconfirmed wouldn't let them edit the article. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:46, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
edit

15 September 2014
edit
Suspected sockpuppets


Another new account taking a close interest in Nabih Berri. Also, this edit has some tell-tale similarities with this edit by Rahda1986 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki), one of the blocked accounts. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 14:38, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
edit

08 August 2015

edit
Suspected sockpuppets

Editing of Nabih Berri, many other confirmed and suspected puppets 'caught' on this page... 495656778774 (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

edit

08 August 2015

edit
Suspected sockpuppets

Editing page of Nabih Berri, sections related to Nabih Berri in Contents of the United States diplomatic cables leak (Middle East) 495656778774 (talk) 13:02, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

edit

17 August 2015

edit
Suspected sockpuppets

Behavior similar to previous sockpuppets. @Mr. Stradivarius: 495656778774 (talk) 10:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

edit