Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kentuky777/Archive

Kentuky777

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Very similar usernames, same kind of gibberish on user talk and user pages Jasper Deng (talk) 23:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I don't think this needs a CU, it's quacking away. Blocks and tags please. Regards, MacMed^talk _stalk 23:27, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk endorsed - Everyone's blocked, but I'm endorsing to find sleepers. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 03:49, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John QW (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is technically indistinguishable from the rest, but a few hours older. Courcelles 04:08, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Is this a shared IP or at a university or something? John QW's edits are very different. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:08, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - It's a large ISP, couldn't drill it down more than that even if I was allowed to- the IP and UA's are an exact match, however. Courcelles 01:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Not that I am saying you should release this info, but if it's a public library (and we don't know or something), IE7/8 are note the best to confirm on as it's popular @ computer labs of any sort. -- DQ (t) (e) 01:55, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - I can trace the IP to a city, but not anything more detailed than that. Courcelles 02:23, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk note: Despite the confirm, I'm still skeptical, so I'm closing with no action against John QW. But if the disruption continues from him, relist and we'll take care of it. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:48, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]