Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Historylands/Archive

Historylands

Historylands (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

24 December 2010

Suspected sockpuppets

Microstretching (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

See talk page of puppet account, who says he/she was prevented as User:Historylands from creating an article about "MicroStretching". Orange Mike | Talk 01:29, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Blocked. Nakon 03:35, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

response - but the block was for a spamusername, and did not address the sockpuppetry issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orangemike (talk • contribs) 03:41, December 24, 2010

Are we looking into a case of other possible socks then? -- DQ (t) ^{Merry Chrismas}_{and a Happy New Year!} 16:21, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: Honestly, this whole thing looks like a mess. Microstretching (talk · contribs) was correctly blocked as a spam username. And the evidence here does seem to indicate that Microstretching is a sock of Historylands. I've tagged Microstretching as a sockpuppet, so I think that's all we can do for now. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 21:31, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]