Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/D.Pearson/Archive


D.Pearson

D.Pearson (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

18 June 2017

edit

Suspected sockpuppets

edit

Bbb23 blocked Deep.Earson as a CU block, but didn't list the account. That account's only edit was to post this on User talk:K.e.coffman. I'm unfamiliar with the exact situation, but this account also seems to be obsessed with Morty [1]. [2] and harassed K.e.coffman as their first edit [3]. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

edit

When I blocked the account, I remember there were already a bunch of other similar accounts blocked by other administrators. I don't think anyone took the trouble to figure out who the oldest account was or tagged any but can't remember for sure. I believe there was another pepe.* account as well blocked by someone. They are all, uh, "obsessed with Morty", and many of their edits were rev/del'd by administrators. Indeed, I think that's how I came across it in the first instance. I can run another check (the listed account is new so probably wasn't there at the time I ran the first check), but, regardless, I'm blocking the account.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oshwah beat me to it.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

07 August 2017

edit

Suspected sockpuppets

edit

Obvious similarity in names/targets. I'll do a CU later today or tomorrow if no one beats me to it. Doug Weller talk 16:26, 7 August 2017 (UTC) They all confirm to each other, including the new one. There's an IP at Oathkeepers and its talk page who is possible but not confirmed. Doug Weller talk 17:05, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by other users

edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

You can add to the list Communist Morty Sucks, which I already blocked. These are all block-on-sight, LTA sockpuppets. It's worth verifying that they are D.H.110, because for a while there was also an imitator doing similar things, named D.Pearson. --MelanieN (talk) 16:53, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

edit

All CU confirmed but these are D.Pearson (talk · contribs), not D.H.110. Thanks, User:MelanieN. I guess we'll need a clerk to move this.   Clerk assistance requested: Doug Weller talk 17:59, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.


14 August 2017

edit

Suspected sockpuppets

edit

Similar name to Attack Mortycopter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who was blocked as a sock of D.Pearson. Editing on same page as said sock, restoring their edits ([4], [5]). Commented over at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cjhard where D.Pearson socks were found ([6]).

Requesting CU confirmation and sleeper check EvergreenFir (talk) 19:13, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this may be Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/D.H.110 given their addition of military planes to their user page like past D.H.110 socks did (see [7], [8]). The Cjhard case linked above shows the overlap in behavior between D.Pearson and D.H.110. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:18, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

edit

  Clerk endorsed to determine between sockmasters and flush other accounts. There are three non-stale accounts in the D.H.110 archive.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 23:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.


15 August 2017

edit

Suspected sockpuppets

edit


Same behavior as previous socks, obsessed with attacking/harassing Morty C-137. Deli nk (talk) 13:03, 15 August 2017 (UTC) Deli nk (talk) 13:03, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

edit

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.