Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Antony1103/Archive

Antony1103

Antony1103 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

04 December 2010

Suspected sockpuppets

DabigoMod (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

I noticed this edit: [1]. This [2] seems to be an admission. I don't know all the history, but this appears to be block evasion from what I can see. Tryptofish (talk) 00:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Administrator note Blocked and tagged. Elockid ^(Talk) 02:11, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note just for the record - block tweaked after user mistagged talk page. Skier Dude (talk 05:54, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

04 December 2010

Suspected sockpuppets

Q1989 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Today, this edit [3] was made by this user, shortly after a previous sock (DabigoMod), the listing being deleted in the diff shown, was blocked (shown in the now-archived previous SPI report, which I have not discussed outside of WP:SPI). As of this time, it was the only edit made by this account. Because the edit deleted the evidence that revealed the previous sock, I cannot imagine any other reason for the deletion other than to delete evidence, knowing of the block. (Not otherwise disruptive, as I would have deleted the listing myself, but it does appear to be continued block evasion.) Tryptofish (talk) 17:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Administrator note Yes, it does seem strange that a new user's first edit would be on a Wikiproject page to remove someone. Blocked and tagged. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 17:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

06 December 2010

Suspected sockpuppets

Toner89 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

This appears to be a continuing pattern of block evasion by a user who wants to be part of WP:WikiProject Aquarium Fishes, where I notice their presence. I have to say it kind of looks like someone who wants to make a clean start, but is doing it wrong, so maybe some advice by an administrator would be helpful at this stage, beyond just a pro forma block.

Anyway, I observe this edit: [4], reasonable on its face, but coming a day after the previous sock block, and notably making reference to helping out at a university 500 gallon reef tank, which is very WP:DUCK with what a previous sock just said: [5]. We at the WikiProject definitely don't see helpers at 500 gallon university tanks every day. Tryptofish (talk) 19:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Confirmed TN X Man 15:03, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note Blocked and tagged. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 15:36, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

17 December 2010

Suspected sockpuppets

TonyPSU (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
66.71.97.39 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
66.71.97.40 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Just paperwork from ANI. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 04:13, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Administrator note Blocked and tagged the user. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 04:15, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]