Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Navnløs

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Navnløs}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Navnløs

• Navnløs (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Suspected sockpuppet:
• Deathbringer from the Sky (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: F
• Supporting evidence:

Navnlos first blocked on the 6th November 2007 at 01:14am by User:TigerShark for 24 hours.

Deathbringer edit at 19:02pm 6th November [1]. - A C/U would show that Navnlos used Deathbringer to evade the block.

Navnlos second block on the 21st November 2007 at 1:06am by User:TigerShark for 48 hours.

Deathbringer edit on 22nd November 00:07am 2007 [2] - Deathbringer edits numerous times on the 22nd.

• Evidence of Similarities:

Several users and myself believe that Navnlos used an sockpuppet to evade his block(s). Our suspicions arose after these particular edits seem suspicious/similiar:

• [3] - Navnlos uses this I.P. to add a comment (In the edit following he quickly corrects it under his username: Navnlos).

• [4] - The same I.P. range (If you 'WhoIs' they are both attached to the Los Rios Community College) makes an edit to DeathBringer's userpage, in the same minute Deathbringer edits again - indicating he has just logged in.

Identical Fair-Use Rationales (uploading band logos): Examples: Deathbringer - [5] [6] Navlos - [7] [8] [9]

See User:Scarian/Sandbox for more evidence if necessary.

Scarian^Talk 10:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

•  Confirmed --Deskana (talk) 19:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: - Since it has now been confirmed that Navnlos evaded both his blocks for 3RR, will he now be blocked again? Scarian^Talk 20:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • That's not for us to determine. We give the evidence, we do not act on it. --Deskana (talk) 01:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.